A Step Closer to Comprehensive Answers: Constrained Multi-Stage Question Decomposition with Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
While large language models exhibit remarkable performance in the Question Answering task, they are susceptible to hallucinations. Challenges arise when these models grapple with understanding multi-hop relations in complex questions or lack the necessary knowledge for a comprehensive response. To address this issue, we introduce the "Decompose-and-Query" framework (D&Q). This framework guides the model to think and utilize external knowledge similar to ReAct, while also restricting its thinking to reliable information, effectively mitigating the risk of hallucinations. Experiments confirm the effectiveness of D&Q: On our ChitChatQA dataset, D&Q does not lose to ChatGPT in 67% of cases; on the HotPotQA question-only setting, D&Q achieved an F1 score of 59.6%. Our code is available at https://github.com/alkaidpku/DQ-ToolQA.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RAG reduces the frequency of hallucinations and improves interpretability, especially for information-sensitive tasks such as question answering and multi-hop reasoning.
“By combining both parametric (trained) and non-parametric (retrieved) sources, RAG reduces the frequency of hallucinations and improves interpretability, especially for information-sensitive tasks such as question answering and multi-hop reasoning [4, 25, 33].”
From SKiM-GPT: combining biomedical literature-based discovery with large language model hypothesis evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
The Abstract and Conclusion say the paper’s Decompose-and-Query framework uses external knowledge to mitigate hallucination risk in question answering, including complex multi-hop questions. They do not establish that RAG generally reduces hallucination frequency or improves interpretability, and they do not discuss the claimed combination of parametric and non-parametric sources. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ofir Press, Muru Zhang, Sewon Min, Ludwig Schmidt, Noah A. Smith, and Mike Lewis. 2022. Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Lan- guage Models.
- Yue Zhang, Yafu Li, Leyang Cui, Deng Cai, Lemao Liu, Tingchen Fu, Xinting Huang, Enbo Zhao, Yu Zhang, Yulong Chen, et al. 2023b. Siren's song in the ai ocean: A survey on hallucination in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01219. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From Illusion to Insight: A Taxonomic Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in LLMs
Kazlaris, I., Antoniou, E. N., Diamantaras, K., & Bratsas, C. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6100260 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models
Mei, L., Yao, J., Ge, Y., Wang, Y., Bi, B., Cai, Y., Liu, J., Li, M., Li, Z.-Z., Zhang, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13334 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Freeman, J., Millikin, R. J., Xu, L., Sharma, I., Moore, B., Lock, C., Shine George, K., Bal, A., Mohanty, C., & Stewart, R. (2025) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-025-06350-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Wang, X., He, J., Chen, L., Haffari, G., Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Meng, X., Pan, K., & Sui, Z. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-naacl.335 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationZhao, W., Liu, K., Ren, Y., Zhang, C., Pan, S., & Zheng, Z. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9671-7_17
From Illusion to Insight: A Taxonomic Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in LLMs
Kazlaris, I., Antoniou, E., Diamantaras, K., & Bratsas, C. (2025) · doi:10.20944/preprints202508.1942.v1 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cao, H., An, Z., Feng, J., Xu, K., Chen, L., & Zhao, D.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Kuaishou (China) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2311.07491
- OpenAlex
- W4388685661
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- question decomposition, hallucination mitigation, large language models, multi-hop question answering, external knowledge retrieval, HotpotQA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
