PreprintCited by 18Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsTopic Modeling

Prometheus-Vision: Vision-Language Model as a Judge for Fine-Grained Evaluation

Open access
Lee, Seongyun, Kim, Seungone, Park, Sue Hyun, Kim, Geewook, Seo, Minjoon·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Assessing long-form responses generated by Vision-Language Models (VLMs) is challenging. It not only requires checking whether the VLM follows the given instruction but also verifying whether the text output is properly grounded on the given image. Inspired by the recent approach of evaluating LMs with LMs, in this work, we propose to evaluate VLMs with VLMs. For this purpose, we present a new feedback dataset called the Perception Collection, encompassing 15K customized score rubrics that users might care about during assessment. Using the Perception Collection, we train Prometheus-Vision, the first open-source VLM evaluator model that can understand the user-defined score criteria during evaluation. Prometheus-Vision shows the highest Pearson correlation with human evaluators and GPT-4V among open-source models, showing its effectiveness for transparent and accessible evaluation of VLMs. We open-source our code, dataset, and model at https://github.com/kaistAI/prometheus-vision

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2401.06591

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing reward approaches for GUI agents struggle to achieve both scalability and performance.

    “Existing reward approaches struggle to achieve both scalability and performance.”

    From OS-Themis: A Scalable Critic Framework for Generalist GUI Rewards (2026) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2024

  • LLM-as-a-judge offers a flexible and scalable paradigm by harnessing generalized reasoning capabilities and extensive world knowledge of foundation models.

    “LLM-as-a-judge offers a flexible and scalable paradigm by harnessing the generalized reason-ing capabilities and extensive world knowledge of foundation models”

    From OS-Themis: A Scalable Critic Framework for Generalist GUI Rewards (2026) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2024

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S., Kim, S., Park, S. H., Kim, G., & Seo, M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
11286-11315
OpenAlex
W4402670365
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
vision-language models, fine-grained evaluation, automated assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review