PreprintCited by 2Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Rephrasing the Web: A Recipe for Compute and Data-Efficient Language Modeling

Open access

Abstract

Large language models are trained on massive scrapes of the web, which are often unstructured, noisy, and poorly phrased. Current scaling laws show that learning from such data requires an abundance of both compute and data, which grows with the size of the model being trained. This is infeasible both because of the large compute costs and duration associated with pre-training, and the impending scarcity of high-quality data on the web. In this work, we propose Web Rephrase Augmented Pre-training ($\textbf{WRAP}$) that uses an off-the-shelf instruction-tuned model prompted to paraphrase documents on the web in specific styles such as "like Wikipedia" or in "question-answer format" to jointly pre-train LLMs on real and synthetic rephrases. First, we show that using WRAP on the C4 dataset, which is naturally noisy, speeds up pre-training by $\sim3x$. At the same pre-training compute budget, it improves perplexity by more than 10% on average across different subsets of the Pile, and improves zero-shot question answer accuracy across 13 tasks by more than 2%. Second, we investigate the impact of the re-phrasing style on the performance of the model, offering insights into how the composition of the training data can impact the performance of LLMs in OOD settings. Our gains are attributed to the fact that re-phrased synthetic data has higher utility than just real data because it (i) incorporates style diversity that closely reflects downstream evaluation style, and (ii) has higher 'quality' than web-scraped data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2401.16380

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synthetic data has emerged as a potential remedy for data scarcity in LLM pre-training.

    “making synthetic data a potential remedy”

    From Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models with Synthetic Data (2026) · cites this paper as Maini et al., 2024

  • Paraphrasing organic Web documents into multiple styles is an effective data augmentation that improves downstream performance.

    “Recent work has shown that paraphrasing organic Web documents into multiple styles is an effective data augmentation to improves downstream performance (Maini et al., 2024; DatologyAI, 2025; Nguyen et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025b).”

    From Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models with Synthetic Data (2026) · cites this paper as Maini et al., 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Amro Abbas, Kushal Tirumala, Daniel Simig, Surya Ganguli, and Ari S. Morcos. Semd- edup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication. ArXiv, abs/2303.09540, 2023. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:257557221. · arXiv
  2. Sina Alemohammad, Josue Casco-Rodriguez, Lorenzo Luzi, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Hossein Babaei, Daniel LeJeune, Ali Siahkoohi, and Richard G Baraniuk. Self-consuming generative models go mad. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01850, 2023. · arXiv
  3. Aida Amini, Saadia Gabriel, Shanchuan Lin, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Yejin Choi, and Han- naneh Hajishirzi. MathQA: Towards interpretable math word problem solving with operation-based formalisms. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North Amer- ican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technolo- gies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 2357-2367, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/N19-1245. URL https://aclanthology.org/N19-1245. · DOI
  4. Shekoofeh Azizi, Simon Kornblith, Chitwan Saharia, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J Fleet. Synthetic data from diffusion models improves imagenet classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08466, 2023. · arXiv
  5. Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, Binyuan Hui, Luo Ji, Mei Li, Junyang Lin, Runji Lin, Dayiheng Liu, Gao Liu, Chengqiang Lu, Keming Lu, Jianxin Ma, Rui Men, Xingzhang Ren, Xuancheng Ren, Chuanqi Tan, Sinan Tan, Jianhong Tu, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Wei Wang, Sheng- guang Wu, Benfeng Xu, Jin Xu, An Yang, Hao Yang, Jian Yang, Shusheng Yang, Yang Yao, Bowen Yu, Hongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Jianwei Zhang, Xingxuan Zhang, Yichang Zhang, Zhenru Zhang, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou, Xiaohuan Zhou, and Tianhang Zhu. Qwen technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023a. · arXiv
  6. Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, et al. Qwen technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023b. · arXiv
  7. Hritik Bansal and Aditya Grover. Leaving reality to imagination: Robust classification via generated datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02503, 2023. · arXiv
  8. Yonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao, and Yejin Choi. Piqa: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural language. In Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020.
  9. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. Language models are few-shot learners. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pp. 1877-1901.
  10. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper files/paper/2020/ file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf.
  11. Lichang Chen, Shiyang Li, Jun Yan, Hai Wang, Kalpa Gunaratna, Vikas Yadav, Zheng Tang, Vijay Srinivasan, Tianyi Zhou, Heng Huang, et al. Alpagasus: Training a better alpaca with fewer data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08701, 2023. · arXiv
  12. Dami Choi, Alexandre Passos, Christopher J Shallue, and George E Dahl. Faster neural network training with data echoing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.05550, 2019. · arXiv
  13. Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, Tom Kwiatkowski, Michael Collins, and Kristina Toutanova. BoolQ: Exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes/no ques- tions. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Pa- pers), pp. 2924-2936, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/N19-1300. URL https://aclanthology.org/N19-1300. · DOI
  14. Peter Clark, Isaac Cowhey, Oren Etzioni, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, and Oyvind Tafjord. Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge. arXiv:1803.05457v1, 2018. · arXiv
  15. Ekin D Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Jonathon Shlens, and Quoc V Le. Randaugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pp. 702-703, 2020.
  16. Jacob Eisenstein. What to do about bad language on the internet. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 359-369, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/N13-1037.
  17. Ronen Eldan and Yuanzhi Li. Tinystories: How small can language models be and still speak coherent english? arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07759, 2023. · arXiv
  18. Stanislav Fort, Andrew Brock, Razvan Pascanu, Soham De, and Samuel L Smith. Drawing multiple augmentation samples per image during training efficiently decreases test error. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.13343, 2021. · arXiv
  19. Richard Futrell, Kyle Mahowald, and Edward Gibson. Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 (33):10336-10341, 2015.
  20. Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Gabriel Ilharco, Alex Fang, Jonathan Hayase, Georgios Smyrnis, Thao Nguyen, Ryan Marten, Mitchell Wortsman, Dhruba Ghosh, Jieyu Zhang, et al. Datacomp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14108, 2023. · arXiv
  21. Leo Gao, Stella Biderman, Sid Black, Laurence Golding, Travis Hoppe, Charles Foster, Jason Phang, Horace He, Anish Thite, Noa Nabeshima, et al. The pile: An 800gb dataset of diverse text for language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00027, 2020. · arXiv
  22. Tianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, and Danqi Chen. Simcse: Simple contrastive learning of sen- tence embeddings. In 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2021, pp. 6894-6910. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2021.
  23. Suriya Gunasekar, Yi Zhang, Jyoti Aneja, Caio César Teodoro Mendes, Allie Del Giorno, Sivakanth Gopi, Mojan Javaheripi, Piero Kauffmann, Gustavo de Rosa, Olli Saarikivi, et al. Textbooks are all you need. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11644, 2023. · arXiv
  24. Suchin Gururangan, Dallas Card, Sarah Dreier, Emily Gade, Leroy Wang, Zeyu Wang, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Noah A. Smith. Whose language counts as high quality? measuring language ideologies in text data selection. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2562-2580, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, December 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022. emnlp-main.165. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.165. · DOI
  25. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2021.
  26. Elad Hoffer, Tal Ben-Nun, Itay Hubara, Niv Giladi, Torsten Hoefler, and Daniel Soudry. Augment your batch: Improving generalization through instance repetition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8129-8138, 2020.
  27. Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, et al. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556, 2022. · arXiv
  28. Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, et al. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825, 2023. · arXiv
  29. Qiao Jin, Bhuwan Dhingra, Zhengping Liu, William Cohen, and Xinghua Lu. Pubmedqa: A dataset for biomedical research question answering. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 2567-2577, 2019.
  30. Jaehun Jung, Peter West, Liwei Jiang, Faeze Brahman, Ximing Lu, Jillian Fisher, Taylor Sorensen, and Yejin Choi. Impossible distillation: from low-quality model to high-quality dataset & model for summarization and paraphrasing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16635, 2023. · arXiv
  31. Abdullatif K öksal, Timo Schick, Anna Korhonen, and Hinrich Sch ütze. Longform: Opti- mizing instruction tuning for long text generation with corpus extraction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08460, 2023. · arXiv
  32. Woosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng, Lianmin Zheng, Cody Hao Yu, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Hao Zhang, and Ion Stoica. Efficient memory management for large language model serving with pagedattention. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 2023.
  33. Xian Li, Ping Yu, Chunting Zhou, Timo Schick, Luke Zettlemoyer, Omer Levy, Jason We- ston, and Mike Lewis. Self-alignment with instruction backtranslation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06259, 2023b. · arXiv
  34. Yuanzhi Li, Sébastien Bubeck, Ronen Eldan, Allie Del Giorno, Suriya Gunasekar, and Yin Tat Lee. Textbooks are all you need ii: phi-1.5 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.05463, 2023c. · arXiv
  35. Bingbin Liu, Sebastien Bubeck, Ronen Eldan, Janardhan Kulkarni, Yuanzhi Li, Anh Nguyen, Rachel Ward, and Yi Zhang. Tinygsm: achieving¿ 80% on gsm8k with small language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09241, 2023a. · arXiv
  36. Hanmeng Liu, Jian Liu, Leyang Cui, Zhiyang Teng, Nan Duan, Ming Zhou, and Yue Zhang. Logiqa 2.0 -an improved dataset for logical reasoning in natural language understanding. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, pp. 1-16, 2023b. doi: 10.1109/TASLP.2023.3293046. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Xiaoxuan Liu, Lanxiang Hu, Peter Bailis, Ion Stoica, Zhijie Deng, Alvin Cheung, and Hao Zhang. Online speculative decoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07177, 2023c. · arXiv
  38. Risto Luukkonen, Ville Komulainen, Jouni Luoma, Anni Eskelinen, Jenna Kanerva, Hanna- Mari Kupari, Filip Ginter, Veronika Laippala, Niklas Muennighoff, Aleksandra Piktus, et al. Fingpt: Large generative models for a small language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05640, 2023. · arXiv
  39. Pratyush Maini, Sachin Goyal, Zachary C Lipton, J Zico Kolter, and Aditi Raghunathan. T-mars: Improving visual representations by circumventing text feature learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03132, 2023. · arXiv
  40. Todor Mihaylov, Peter Clark, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. Can a suit of armor conduct electricity? a new dataset for open book question answering. In EMNLP, 2018.
  41. Niklas Muennighoff, Alexander M Rush, Boaz Barak, Teven Le Scao, Aleksandra Piktus, Nouamane Tazi, Sampo Pyysalo, Thomas Wolf, and Colin Raffel. Scaling data-constrained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16264, 2023. · arXiv
  42. Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730-27744, 2022.
  43. Masanori Oya. Three types of average dependency distances of sentences in a multilingual parallel corpus. In Proceedings of the 35th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp. 652-661, 2021.
  44. Vishakh Padmakumar, Behnam Hedayatnia, Di Jin, Patrick Lange, Seokhwan Kim, Nanyun Peng, Yang Liu, and Dilek Hakkani-Tur. Investigating the representation of open do- main dialogue context for transformer models. In Proceedings of the 24th Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 538-547, Prague, Czechia, September 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/2023. sigdial-1.
  45. Guilherme Penedo, Quentin Malartic, Daniel Hesslow, Ruxandra Cojocaru, Alessandro Cappelli, Hamza Alobeidli, Baptiste Pannier, Ebtesam Almazrouei, and Julien Launay. The refinedweb dataset for falcon llm: outperforming curated corpora with web data, and web data only. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01116, 2023. · arXiv
  46. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pp. 8748-8763. PMLR, 2021.
  47. Jack W Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, et al. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training gopher. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11446, 2021. · arXiv
  48. Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(1):5485-5551, 2020.
  49. Christoph Schuhmann, Romain Beaumont, Richard Vencu, Cade Gordon, Ross Wightman, Mehdi Cherti, Theo Coombes, Aarush Katta, Clayton Mullis, Mitchell Wortsman, et al. Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:25278-25294, 2022.
  50. Zhiqiang Shen, Tianhua Tao, Liqun Ma, Willie Neiswanger, Joel Hestness, Natalia Vassilieva, Daria Soboleva, and Eric Xing. Slimpajama-dc: Understanding data combinations for llm training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10818, 2023. · arXiv
  51. Ilia Shumailov, Zakhar Shumaylov, Yiren Zhao, Yarin Gal, Nicolas Papernot, and Ross Anderson. Model dementia: Generated data makes models forget. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17493, 2023. · arXiv
  52. Irene Solaiman and Christy Dennison. Process for adapting language models to society (palms) with values-targeted datasets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:5861-5873, 2021.
  53. Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023. · arXiv
  54. Brandon Trabucco, Kyle Doherty, Max Gurinas, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Effective data augmentation with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07944, 2023. · arXiv
  55. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems, 30, 2017.
  56. Pablo Villalobos, Jaime Sevilla, Lennart Heim, Tamay Besiroglu, Marius Hobbhahn, and Anson Ho. Will we run out of data? an analysis of the limits of scaling datasets in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.04325, 2022. · arXiv
  57. Yuxiang Wei, Zhe Wang, Jiawei Liu, Yifeng Ding, and Lingming Zhang. Magicoder: Source code is all you need. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02120, 2023. · arXiv
  58. Guillaume Wenzek, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Alexis Conneau, Vishrav Chaudhary, Francisco Guzmán, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. CCNet: Extracting high quality monolin- gual datasets from web crawl data. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 4003-4012, Marseille, France, May 2020. European Language Resources Association. ISBN 979-10-95546-34-4. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020. lrec-1.494.
  59. Sang Michael Xie, Hieu Pham, Xuanyi Dong, Nan Du, Hanxiao Liu, Yifeng Lu, Percy Liang, Quoc V Le, Tengyu Ma, and Adams Wei Yu. Doremi: Optimizing data mixtures speeds up language model pretraining. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10429, 2023. · arXiv
  60. Fuzhao Xue, Yao Fu, Wangchunshu Zhou, Zangwei Zheng, and Yang You. To repeat or not to repeat: Insights from scaling llm under token-crisis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13230, 2023. · arXiv
  61. Haichao Yu, Yu Tian, Sateesh Kumar, Linjie Yang, and Heng Wang. The devil is in the details: A deep dive into the rabbit hole of data filtering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15954, 2023. · arXiv
  62. Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, and Yejin Choi. Hellaswag: Can a machine really finish your sentence? In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019.
  63. Chunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srini Iyer, Jiao Sun, Yuning Mao, Xuezhe Ma, Avia Efrat, Ping Yu, Lili Yu, et al. Lima: Less is more for alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11206, 2023. Dataset (Real Tok.) ARC-E BoolQ Wino. PIQA HellaSwag TruthfulQA OBQA LogiQA Avg C4-18B 50.5 52.8 53.0 69.8 35.6 37.8 18.6 23.0 42.6 C4-75B 51.4 53.4 51.6 70.3 36.1 39.0 17.4 22.6 42.7 QA+C4-18B 53.4 60.7 52.2 70.0 36.3 40.0 17.6 22.3 44.1 Med+C4-18B 50.6 57.3 53.6 70.8 36.1 36.9 18.6 22.0 43.2 Dataset (Real Tok.) ARC-C SciQ PubMedQA MathQA MMLU Avg C4-35B 27.0 83.4 55.0 22.5 24.3 42.4 C4-150B 25.9 83.8 55.4 23.5 25.4 42.8 Med+C4-35B 27.2 82.2 46.2 23.1 25.2 40.8 QA+C4-35B 29.0 85.1 62.2 22.5 26.1 45.0 Table 10: Evaluation of ∼ 1.3B parameter LLMs trained for 150B tokens on Specialized Knowledge Tasks. This table presents the performance on tasks that require specific domain knowledge such as science, medicine, mathematics, and logic. Dataset (Real Tok.) ARC-E BoolQ Wino. PIQA HellaSwag TruthfulQA OBQA LogiQA Avg C4-35B 58.6 55.2 56.1 73.9 44.5 36.0 22.2 22.8 46.2 C4-150B 59.1 54.4 56.4 74.5 44.9 34.3 22.2 22.1 46.0 Med+C4-35B 59.8 57.0 55.7 74.6 44.5 36.5 23.8 21.5 46.7 QA+C4-35B 62.2 63.3 55.7 74.8 44.6 41.4 22.4 23.2 48.4 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models with Synthetic Data

    Kiyomaru, H., Oda, Y., Kodama, T., Liu, C., & Kawahara, D. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-eacl.52

    “Synthetic data has received increasing attention as a means to break the data bottleneck in LLM pre-training (Gunasekar et al., 2023; Abdin et al., 2024; Maini et al., 2024; Cheng et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2024; Qin et al., 2025; DatologyAI, 2025; Nguyen et al., 2025).”
    Influential
  • Self-Adapting Language Models

    Zweiger, A., Pari, J., Guo, H., Akyürek, E., Kim, Y., & Agrawal, P. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 3

    “The creation of synthetic data for LLM training is increasingly common, from large-scale pretraining datasets [15, 16, 17, 18, 19] to task-specific data augmentation [20, 21, 22] and instruction-tuning sets [23, 24].”

Metadata

Authors
Maini, P., Seto, S., Bai, H., Grangier, D., Zhang, Y., & Jaitly, N.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391377045
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
large language model pretraining, synthetic training data, instruction-tuned models, computational efficiency, data efficiency, out-of-distribution generalization, zero-shot question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review