Cited by 27Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Logiqa 2.0—An improved dataset for logical reasoning in natural language understanding

Liu, Hanmeng, Liu, Jian, Cui, Leyang, Teng, Zhiyang, Duan, Nan, Zhou, Ming, Zhang, Yue·2023·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing

Abstract

NLP research on logical reasoning regains momentum with the recent releases of a handful of datasets, notably LogiQA and Reclor. Logical reasoning is exploited in many probing tasks over large Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) and downstream tasks like question-answering and dialogue systems. In this paper, we release LogiQA 2.0. The dataset is an amendment and re-annotation of LogiQA in 2020, a large-scale logical reasoning reading comprehension dataset adapted from the Chinese Civil Service Examination. We increase the data size, refine the texts with manual translation by professionals, and improve the quality by removing items with distinctive cultural features like Chinese idioms. Furthermore, we conduct a fine-grained annotation on the dataset and turn it into a two-way natural language inference (NLI) task, resulting in 35k premise-hypothesis pairs with gold labels, making it the first large-scale NLI dataset for complex logical reasoning. Compared to Question Answering, Natural Language Inference excels in generalizability and helps downstream tasks better. We establish a baseline for logical reasoning in NLI and incite further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taslp.2023.3293046

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, H., Liu, J., Cui, L., Teng, Z., Duan, N., Zhou, M., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Westlake University (CN)
  • Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • Langboat Technology, Beijing, China
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing
Published
2023
Volume
31
Pages
2947-2962
ISSN
  • 2329-9290 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-9304
OpenAlex
W4383340139
Cited by
26
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
logical reasoning, natural language inference, reading comprehension, data annotation, Chinese idioms, large pre-trained language models, question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review