CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 25Stock Market Forecasting MethodsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesArtificial Intelligence Applications

QuantAgent: Seeking Holy Grail in Trading by Self-Improving Large Language Model

Open access
Wang, Saizhuo, Yuan, Hang, Ni, Lionel M., Guo, Jian·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2402.03755arXiv 2402.03755
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Autonomous agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) that devise plans and tackle real-world challenges have gained prominence.However, tailoring these agents for specialized domains like quantitative investment remains a formidable task. The core challenge involves efficiently building and integrating a domain-specific knowledge base for the agent's learning process. This paper introduces a principled framework to address this challenge, comprising a two-layer loop.In the inner loop, the agent refines its responses by drawing from its knowledge base, while in the outer loop, these responses are tested in real-world scenarios to automatically enhance the knowledge base with new insights.We demonstrate that our approach enables the agent to progressively approximate optimal behavior with provable efficiency.Furthermore, we instantiate this framework through an autonomous agent for mining trading signals named QuantAgent. Empirical results showcase QuantAgent's capability in uncovering viable financial signals and enhancing the accuracy of financial forecasts.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2402.03755

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • QuantAgent demonstrated that an LLM can produce alpha factors through an inner-loop-outer-loop architecture.

    “QuantAgent [48] demonstrated this method that leverages the LLM's capability to produce alpha factors through an innerloop-outerloop architecture.”

    From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

  • Both QuantAgent and AlphaGPT demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the LLM-powered alpha mining agent system.

    “Both studies demonstrates the effectiveness and efficiency of the LLM powered alpha mining agent system, which is especially valuable as alpha mining is an resource intensive job.”

    From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

  • The QuantAgent approach enables the agent to progressively approximate optimal behavior with reasonable efficiency.

    “It has been proved that that this approach enables the agent to progressively approximate optimal behavior with reasonable efficiency.”

    From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

  • In QuantAgent [48], Information Coefficient (IC) [55] is calculated to quantify correlation between predicted signals and future returns.

    “In QuantAgent [48], the Information Coefficient (IC) [55] is calculated to quantify the correlation between predicted signals and future returns.”

    From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

  • QuantAgent is the only study encountered that addresses cost of generating LLM tokens and computational time complexity for both training and inference.

    “However, QuantAgent is the only study we have encountered that addresses the cost of generating LLM tokens and the computational time complexity for both training and inference.”

    From Large Language Model Agent in Financial Trading: A Survey (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Wang, S., Yuan, H., Ni, L. M., & Guo, J.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
ORCID
Ni, Lionel M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2402.03755
arXiv
2402.03755
OpenAlex
W4391631759
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
large language models, autonomous agents, quantitative investment, knowledge base refinement, self-improving agents, financial forecasting, domain knowledge base

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review