The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EVEDIT: Event-based Knowledge Editing with Deductive Editing Boundaries
Open accessAbstract
The dynamic nature of real-world information necessitates efficient knowledge editing (KE) in large language models (LLMs) for knowledge updating. However, current KE approaches, which typically operate on (subject, relation, object) triples, ignore the contextual information and the relation among different knowledge. Such editing methods could thus encounter an uncertain editing boundary, leaving a lot of relevant knowledge in ambiguity: Queries that could be answered pre-edit cannot be reliably answered afterward. In this work, we analyze this issue by introducing a theoretical framework for KE that highlights an overlooked set of knowledge that remains unchanged and aids in knowledge deduction during editing, which we name as the deduction anchor. We further address this issue by proposing a novel task of event-based knowledge editing that pairs facts with event descriptions. This task manifests not only a closer simulation of real-world editing scenarios but also a more logically sound setting, implicitly defining the deduction anchor to address the issue of indeterminate editing boundaries. We empirically demonstrate the superiority of event-based editing over the existing setting on resolving uncertainty in edited models, and curate a new benchmark dataset EvEdit derived from the CounterFact dataset. Moreover, while we observe that the event-based setting is significantly challenging for existing approaches, we propose a novel approach Self-Edit that showcases stronger performance, achieving 55.6% consistency improvement while maintaining the naturalness of generation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most existing knowledge editing methods only work on fixed and limited updating rules and knowledge entity triples.
“most existing methods only work on fixed and limited updating rules and knowledge entity triples [150]”
From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [150]
Citations
Cites
Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension
Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/k17-1034 · Cited by 482 · cited 1×
“Other commonly used knowledge editing datasets include ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017; Yao et al., 2023), WikiBio (Hartvigsen et al., 2023), WikiData (Cohen et al., 2023), and ConvSent (Mitchell et al., 2022).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factuality challenges in the era of large language models and opportunities for fact-checking
Augenstein, I., Baldwin, T., Cha, M., Chakraborty, T., Ciampaglia, G. L., Corney, D., DiResta, R., Ferrara, E., Hale, S., Halevy, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00881-z · Cited by 187
Self-citationAi, Q., Zhan, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02842
“Studies on this direction is still in an early stage as most existing methods only work on fixed and limited updating rules and knowledge entity triples [150], but it could be fruitful in future since domain adaption and external corpus modeling is a wide need of LLM applications in practice.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Yu, P., Zhang, Y., Li, S., Zhang, Z., & Ji, H.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2402.11324
- OpenAlex
- W4392011645
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- knowledge editing, large language models, knowledge updating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review