Me LLaMA: Foundation Large Language Models for Medical Applications
Open accessAbstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and LLaMA show promise in medical applications, yet challenges remain in medical language comprehension. This study presents Me-LLaMA, a new medical LLM family based on open-source LLaMA models, optimized for medical text analysis and diagnosis by leveraging large-scale, domain-specific datasets. The Me-LLaMA family, including foundation models Me-LLaMA 13/70B and their chat-enhanced versions, was developed through continued pre-training and instruction tuning with 129B tokens and 214K samples from biomedical and clinical sources. Training the 70B models required over 100,000 A100 GPU hours. Me-LLaMA's performance was evaluated across six medical text analysis tasks using 12 benchmark datasets and complex clinical case diagnosis, with automatic and human evaluations. Results indicate Me-LLaMA outperforms LLaMA and other open-source medical LLMs in zero-shot and supervised settings. Task-specific tuning further boosts performance, surpassing ChatGPT on 7 of 8 datasets and GPT-4 on 5 of 8. For complex clinical cases, Me-LLaMA achieves performance comparable to ChatGPT and GPT-4. This work underscores the importance of domain-specific data in developing medical LLMs and addresses the high computational costs involved in training, highlighting a balance between pre-training and fine-tuning strategies. Me-LLaMA models are now accessible under user agreements, providing a valuable resource for advancing medical AI.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MedLLaMA3 ranked second on the HuggingFace MedLLM Leaderboard in May 2024.
“On May 2024, MedLLaMA3 ranked second on the HuggingFace MedLLM Leaderboard, showcasing its exceptional performance in medical-related natural language processing tasks”
From AgentClinic: a multimodal benchmark for tool-using clinical AI agents (2026) · cites this paper as [45]
The Model Performance and Methods sections describe Me-LLaMA models built on LLaMA2, but do not address MedLLaMA3. Searches for MedLLaMA3 and the May 2024 HuggingFace MedLLM Leaderboard ranking found no passage supporting the claimed second-place rank. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Johnson, A. E. et al. Mimic-cxr, a de-identified publicly available database of chest radiographs with free-text reports. Scientific data 6, 317 (2019).
- Ben Abacha, A., Shivade, C. & Demner-Fushman, D. Overview of the mediqa 2019 shared task on textual inference, question entailment and question answering. In ACL-BioNLP 2019 (2019).
- Yu, B., Li, Y. & Wang, J. Detecting causal language use in science findings. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), 4664- 4674 (2019).
- Hu, E. J. et al. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations (2022).
- Zhang, X., Wu, J., He, Z., Liu, X. & Su, Y. Medical exam question answering with large-scale reading comprehension. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 32 (2018).
- Pal, A., Umapathi, L. K. & Sankarasubbu, M. Medmcqa: A large-scale multi-subject multi- choice dataset for medical domain question answering. In Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, 248-260 (PMLR, 2022).
- Uzuner, Özlem, et al. "2010 i2b2/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text." Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18.5 (2011): 552-556.
- Segura-Bedmar, I., Martínez Fernández, P. & Herrero Zazo, M. Semeval-2013 task 9: Extraction of drug-drug interactions from biomedical texts (ddiextraction 2013) (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013).
- Kanjee, Zahir, Byron Crowe, and Adam Rodman. Accuracy of a generative artificial intelligence model in a complex diagnostic challenge. Jama 330.1 (2023): 78-80.
- Hu, Yan, et al. Improving large language models for clinical named entity recognition via prompt engineering. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (2024): ocad259.
- Savage, Thomas, et al. Diagnostic reasoning prompts reveal the potential for large language model interpretability in medicine. NPJ Digital Medicine 7.1 (2024): 20.
- Stiennon, N. et al. Learning to summarize with human feedback. Advances Neural Information Processing Systems 33, 3008-3021 (2020).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Small language models learn enhanced reasoning skills from medical textbooks
Kim, H., Hwang, H., Lee, J.-W., Park, S., Kim, D. R., Lee, T., Yoon, C., Sohn, J., Park, J., Reykhart, O., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01653-8 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationGiuffrè, M., Kresevic, S., Pugliese, N., You, K., & Shung, D. L. (2024) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.15974 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationFleurence, R. L., Bian, J., Wang, X., Xu, H., Dawoud, D., Higashi, M., & Chhatwal, J. (2025) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2024.10.3846 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Development Landscape of Large Language Models for Biomedical Applications
Cao, Z., Keloth, V. K., Xie, Q., Qian, L., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Shi, R., Zhou, W., Yang, G. F., Zhang, J., et al. (2025) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-102224-074736 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationAgentClinic: a multimodal benchmark for tool-using clinical AI agents
Schmidgall, S., Ziaei, R., Harris, C., Kim, J. W., Reis, E. P., Jopling, J., & Moor, M. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02674-7 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Foundation Models for Translational Cancer Biology
Tsang, K. K., Kivelson, S., Cortina, J. M. A., Kuchi, A., Berkowitz, J. S., Liu, H., Srinivasan, A., Friedrich, N. A., Fatapour, Y., & Tatonetti, N. P. (2025) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-103123-095633 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Yang, S., Luo, Y., Fotedar, N., Jiao, M., Rao, V. R., Ju, X., Wu, S., Xian, X., Sun, H., Karakis, I., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.05.26.24307955 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Knox, S., Aghamoosa, S., Heider, P. M., Cutty, M. E., Wright, A., Scherbakov, D., Hood, G., Nolin, S. A., & Obeid, J. S. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1002/trc2.70089 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Pham, M.-K., Mai, T. T., Dao, T. T. P., Tran, M., Crane, M., & Bezbradica, M. (2025) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.175021755.55836808/v1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xie, Q., Chen, Q., Chen, A., Peng, C., Hu, Y., Lin, F., Peng, X., Huang, J., Zhang, J., Keloth, V., Zhou, X., Qian, L., He, H., Shung, D., Ohno-Machado, L., Wu, Y., Xu, H., & Bian, J.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- University of Florida Health (US)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2402.12749
- OpenAlex
- W4392019992
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- medical large language models, llamas, foundation models, clinical text mining, diagnosis, biomedical text, instruction tuning, zero-shot learning, domain-specific pre-training, open-source models, artificial intelligence in healthcare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
