The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Can Watermarks Survive Translation? On the Cross-lingual Consistency of Text Watermark for Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Text watermarking technology aims to tag and identify content produced by large language models (LLMs) to prevent misuse. In this study, we introduce the concept of cross-lingual consistency in text watermarking, which assesses the ability of text watermarks to maintain their effectiveness after being translated into other languages. Preliminary empirical results from two LLMs and three watermarking methods reveal that current text watermarking technologies lack consistency when texts are translated into various languages. Based on this observation, we propose a Cross-lingual Watermark Removal Attack (CWRA) to bypass watermarking by first obtaining a response from an LLM in a pivot language, which is then translated into the target language. CWRA can effectively remove watermarks, decreasing the AUCs to a random-guessing level without performance loss. Furthermore, we analyze two key factors that contribute to the cross-lingual consistency in text watermarking and propose X-SIR as a defense method against CWRA. Code: https://github.com/zwhe99/X-SIR.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For AIGC detection systems against watermarking, techniques such as watermark stealing, Self Color Testing-based Substitution (SCTBS), and language translation have been developed.
“For instance, for AIGC detection systems against watermarking, techniques such as watermark stealing [125], Self Color Testing-based Substitution (SCTBS) [126], and language translation [127] have been developed.”
From Survey on Plagiarism Detection in Large Language Models: The Impact of ChatGPT and Gemini on Academic Integrity (2024) · cites this paper as [125]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Models
Liu, A., Pan, L., Lu, Y., Li, J., Hu, X., Zhang, X., Wen, L., King, I., Xiong, H., & Yu, P. S. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3691626 · Cited by 134
Self-citationWatermarking for Large Language Models: A Survey
Yang, Z., Zhao, G., & Wu, H. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13091420 · Cited by 26
Pudasaini, S., Miralles-Pechuán, L., Lillis, D., & Salvador, M. L. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.13105 · Cited by 8
“For instance, for AIGC detection systems against watermarking, techniques such as watermark stealing [125], Self Color Testing-based Substitution (SCTBS) [126], and language translation [127] have been developed.”
MethodRobustness Analysis of Maryland Watermark to Paraphrasing Attacks Under Advanced Techniques
Kumar, R. (2025) · Asian Journal of Computer Science Engineering · doi:10.22377/ajcse.v10i2.213
Metadata
- Authors
- He, Z., Zhou, B., Hao, H., Liu, A., Wang, X., Tu, Z., Zhang, Z., & Wang, R.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Tencent (China) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2402.14007
- OpenAlex
- W4392136010
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Tencent
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21B2020, 2021SHZDZX0102)
- Ministry of Education, India
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
- Keywords
- text watermarking, large language models, cross-lingual consistency, watermark removal, pivot language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review