PreprintCited by 4Advanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Can Watermarks Survive Translation? On the Cross-lingual Consistency of Text Watermark for Large Language Models

Open access

Abstract

Text watermarking technology aims to tag and identify content produced by large language models (LLMs) to prevent misuse. In this study, we introduce the concept of cross-lingual consistency in text watermarking, which assesses the ability of text watermarks to maintain their effectiveness after being translated into other languages. Preliminary empirical results from two LLMs and three watermarking methods reveal that current text watermarking technologies lack consistency when texts are translated into various languages. Based on this observation, we propose a Cross-lingual Watermark Removal Attack (CWRA) to bypass watermarking by first obtaining a response from an LLM in a pivot language, which is then translated into the target language. CWRA can effectively remove watermarks, decreasing the AUCs to a random-guessing level without performance loss. Furthermore, we analyze two key factors that contribute to the cross-lingual consistency in text watermarking and propose X-SIR as a defense method against CWRA. Code: https://github.com/zwhe99/X-SIR.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2402.14007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For AIGC detection systems against watermarking, techniques such as watermark stealing, Self Color Testing-based Substitution (SCTBS), and language translation have been developed.

    “For instance, for AIGC detection systems against watermarking, techniques such as watermark stealing [125], Self Color Testing-based Substitution (SCTBS) [126], and language translation [127] have been developed.”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
He, Z., Zhou, B., Hao, H., Liu, A., Wang, X., Tu, Z., Zhang, Z., & Wang, R.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392136010
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Tencent
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21B2020, 2021SHZDZX0102)
  • Ministry of Education, India
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Keywords
text watermarking, large language models, cross-lingual consistency, watermark removal, pivot language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review