The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Pseudo-Random Generator based on a Photonic Neuromorphic Physical Unclonable Function
Open accessAbstract
In this work we provide numerical results concerning a silicon-on-insulator photonic neuromorphic circuit configured as a physical unclonable function. The proposed scheme is enhanced with the capability to be operated as an unconventional deterministic pseudo-random number generator, suitable for cryptographic applications that alleviates the need for key storage in non-volatile digital media. The proposed photonic neuromorphic scheme is able to offer NIST test compatible numbers with an extremely low false positive/negative probability below 10-14. The proposed scheme offers multi-functional capabilities due to the fact that it can be simultaneously used as an integrated photonic accelerator for machine-learning applications and as a hardware root of trust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Large Reasoning Language Models (LRLMs or LRMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, but suffer from significant computational inefficiencies due to overthinking phenomena.”
From ARS: Adaptive Reasoning Suppression for Efficient Large Reasoning Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Models often continue generating redundant reasoning steps even after reaching correct intermediate solutions, resulting in unnecessarily long inference times, increased token consumption, and higher computational costs.”
From ARS: Adaptive Reasoning Suppression for Efficient Large Reasoning Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- J. Kelsey, B. Schneier, D. Wagner, and C. Hall, "Cryptanalytic Attacks on Pseudorandom Number Generators," in Fast Software Encryption, vol. 1372, S. Vaudenay, Ed., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1372. , Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998, pp. 168- 188. doi: 10.1007/3-540-69710-1_12. · DOI
- R. Maes, Physically Unclonable Functions: Constructions, Properties and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-41395-7. · DOI
- C. Herder, M.-D. Yu, F. Koushanfar, and S. Devadas, "Physical Unclonable Functions and Applications: A Tutorial," Proc. IEEE, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 1126-1141, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2320516. · DOI
- R. Pappu, B. Recht, J. Taylor, and N. Gershenfeld, "Physical One-Way Functions," Science, vol. 297, no. 5589, pp. 2026-2030, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1126/science.1074376. · DOI
- B. Gassend, D. Clarke, M. Van Dijk, and S. Devadas, "Silicon physical random functions," in Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, Washington, DC USA: ACM, Nov. 2002, pp. 148-160. doi: 10.1145/586110.586132. · DOI
- J. Guajardo, S. S. Kumar, G.-J. Schrijen, and P. Tuyls, "FPGA Intrinsic PUFs and Their Use for IP Protection," in Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems -CHES 2007, vol. 4727, P. Paillier and I. Verbauwhede, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4727. , Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 63-80. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74735-2_5. · DOI
- X. Xu and W. Burleson, "Hybrid side-channel/machine-learning attacks on PUFs: A new threat?," in Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), 2014, Dresden, Germany: IEEE Conference Publications, 2014, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.7873/DATE.2014.362. · DOI
- B. M. S. Bahar Talukder, F. Ferdaus, and M. T. Rahman, "Memory- Based PUFs are Vulnerable as Well: A Non-Invasive Attack Against SRAM PUFs," IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., vol. 16, pp. 4035- 4049, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2021.3101045. · DOI
- U. Ruhrmair et al., "PUF Modeling Attacks on Simulated and Silicon Data," IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1876-1891, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2013.2279798. · DOI · Paper page
- M. Cortez, A. Dargar, S. Hamdioui, and G.-J. Schrijen, "Modeling SRAM start-up behavior for Physical Unclonable Functions," in 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFT), Austin, TX, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2012, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/DFT.2012.6378190. · DOI
- Y. Gao, S. F. Al-Sarawi, and D. Abbott, "Physical unclonable functions," Nat. Electron., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 81-91, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41928-020-0372-5. · DOI
- A. F. Smith, P. Patton, and S. E. Skrabalak, "Plasmonic Nanoparticles as a Physically Unclonable Function for Responsive Anti-Counterfeit Nanofingerprints," Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1315-1321, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1002/adfm.201503989. · DOI
- N. Kayaci, R. Ozdemir, M. Kalay, N. B. Kiremitler, H. Usta, and M. S. Onses, "Organic Light-Emitting Physically Unclonable Functions," Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 32, no. 14, p. 2108675, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1002/adfm.202108675. · DOI
- M. S. Kim, G. J. Lee, J. W. Leem, S. Choi, Y. L. Kim, and Y. M. Song, "Revisiting silk: a lens-free optical physical unclonable function," Nat. Commun., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 247, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41467-021- 27278-5. · DOI
- A. Anastasiou, E. I. Zacharaki, A. Tsakas, K. Moustakas, and D. Alexandropoulos, "Laser fabrication and evaluation of holographic intrinsic physical unclonable functions," Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2891, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06407-0. · DOI
- C. Mesaritakis et al., "Physical Unclonable Function based on a Multi- Mode Optical Waveguide," Sci. Rep., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 9653, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28008-6. · DOI
- R. A. John et al., "Halide perovskite memristors as flexible and reconfigurable physical unclonable functions," Nat. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 3681, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24057-0. · DOI
- H. M. Ibrahim, H. Abunahla, B. Mohammad, and H. AlKhzaimi, "Memristor-based PUF for lightweight cryptographic randomness," Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 8633, May 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022- 11240-6. · DOI
- B. C. Grubel et al., "Silicon photonic physical unclonable function," Opt. Express, vol. 25, no. 11, p. 12710, May 2017, doi: 10.1364/OE.25.012710. · DOI
- F. B. Tarik, A. Famili, Y. Lao, and J. D. Ryckman, "Scalable and CMOS compatible silicon photonic physical unclonable functions for supply chain assurance," Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 15653, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19796-z. · DOI
- A. M. Smith and H. S. Jacinto, "Reconfigurable Integrated Optical Interferometer Network-Based Physically Unclonable Function," J. Light. Technol., vol. 38, no. 17, pp. 4599-4606, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2020.2996015. · DOI
- B. T. Bosworth et al., "Unclonable photonic keys hardened against machine learning attacks," APL Photonics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 010803, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1063/1.5100178. · DOI
- D. Dermanis, A. Bogris, P. Rizomiliotis, and C. Mesaritakis, "Photonic Physical Unclonable Function Based on Integrated Neuromorphic Devices," J. Light. Technol., vol. 40, no. 22, pp. 7333-7341, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3200307. · DOI
- K. Sozos, A. Bogris, P. Bienstman, G. Sarantoglou, S. Deligiannidis, and C. Mesaritakis, "High-speed photonic neuromorphic computing using recurrent optical spectrum slicing neural networks," Commun. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 24, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s44172-022-00024-5. · DOI
- A. Tsirigotis et al., "Unconventional Integrated Photonic Accelerators for High-Throughput Convolutional Neural Networks," Intell. Comput., vol. 2, p. 0032, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.34133/icomputing.0032. · DOI
- M. Lukoševičius, H. Jaeger, and B. Schrauwen, "Reservoir Computing Trends," KI -Künstl. Intell., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 365-371, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s13218-012-0204-5. · DOI
- A. F. Atiya and A. G. Parlos, "New results on recurrent network training: unifying the algorithms and accelerating convergence," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 697-709, May 2000, doi: 10.1109/72.846741. · DOI
- M. C. Mackey and L. Glass, "Oscillation and Chaos in Physiological Control Systems," Science, vol. 197, no. 4300, pp. 287-289, Jul. 1977, doi: 10.1126/science.267326. · DOI
- L. E. Bassham et al., "A statistical test suite for random and pseudorandom number generators for cryptographic applications," National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, NIST SP 800-22r1a, 2010. doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-22r1a. · DOI · Paper page
- Y. Xing, J. Dong, S. Dwivedi, U. Khan, and W. Bogaerts, "Accurate extraction of fabricated geometry using optical measurement," Photonics Res., vol. 6, no. 11, p. 1008, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1364/PRJ.6.001008. · DOI
- Y. Su, Y. Zhang, C. Qiu, X. Guo, and L. Sun, "Silicon Photonic Platform for Passive Waveguide Devices: Materials, Fabrication, and Applications," Adv. Mater. Technol., vol. 5, no. 8, p. 1901153, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1002/admt.201901153. · DOI
- L. Devroye, Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1986. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-8643-8. · DOI
- D. E. Knuth, The art of computer programming, volume 2 (3rd ed.): seminumerical algorithms. USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1997.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Dermanis, D., Rizomiliotis, P., Bogris, A., & Mesaritakis, C.
- Affiliations
- University of the Aegean (GR)
- Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
- University of West Attica (GR)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0018-9197 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2402.14876
- OpenAlex
- W4403022295
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission (101070195)
- Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (QUASAR 016594)
- HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (101070195)
- HORIZON EUROPE Digital, Industry and Space (PROMETHEUS 101070195)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
- Keywords
- pseudorandom number generators, physical unclonable functions, silicon photonics, deterministic randomness, cryptographic key storage, NIST randomness tests, hardware root of trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review