PreprintCited by 6Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingNatural Language Processing Techniques

Researchy Questions: A Dataset of Multi-Perspective, Decompositional Questions for LLM Web Agents

Open access
Rosset, Corby, Chung, Ho-Lam, Qin, Guanghui, Chau, Ethan C., Feng, Zhuo, Awadallah, Ahmed, Neville, Jennifer, Rao, Nikhil·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Existing question answering (QA) datasets are no longer challenging to most powerful Large Language Models (LLMs). Traditional QA benchmarks like TriviaQA, NaturalQuestions, ELI5 and HotpotQA mainly study ``known unknowns'' with clear indications of both what information is missing, and how to find it to answer the question. Hence, good performance on these benchmarks provides a false sense of security. A yet unmet need of the NLP community is a bank of non-factoid, multi-perspective questions involving a great deal of unclear information needs, i.e. ``unknown uknowns''. We claim we can find such questions in search engine logs, which is surprising because most question-intent queries are indeed factoid. We present Researchy Questions, a dataset of search engine queries tediously filtered to be non-factoid, ``decompositional'' and multi-perspective. We show that users spend a lot of ``effort'' on these questions in terms of signals like clicks and session length, and that they are also challenging for GPT-4. We also show that ``slow thinking'' answering techniques, like decomposition into sub-questions shows benefit over answering directly. We release $\sim$ 100k Researchy Questions, along with the Clueweb22 URLs that were clicked.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2402.17896

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Researchy Questions dataset consists of approximately 96,000 real-world information-seeking queries that led users to engage with multiple documents during search sessions.

    “the dataset consists of approximately 96,000 real-world information-seeking queries that led users to engage with multiple documents during search sessions, as measured by aggregated click distributions over ClueWeb22.”
  • The Researchy Questions dataset was curated specifically to capture queries that drive extensive information exploration and synthesis.

    “The Researchy Questions dataset (Rosset et al., 2024) was curated specifically to capture such queries.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 6

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Jonathan Berant, Andrew Chou, Roy Frostig, and Percy Liang. 2013. Semantic parsing on Freebase from question-answer pairs. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lan- guage Processing, pages 1533-1544, Seattle, Wash- ington, USA. Association for Computational Linguis- tics.
  2. Valeriia Bolotova, Vladislav Blinov, Falk Scholer, W. Bruce Croft, and Mark Sanderson. 2022. A non- factoid question-answering taxonomy. In Proceed- ings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Confer- ence on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '22, page 1196-1207, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI
  3. Valeriia Bolotova-Baranova, Vladislav Blinov, Sofya Filippova, Falk Scholer, and Mark Sanderson. 2023. WikiHowQA: A comprehensive benchmark for multi- document non-factoid question answering. In Pro- ceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 5291-5314, Toronto, Canada. Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  4. Fan Bu, Xingwei Zhu, Yu Hao, and Xiaoyan Zhu. 2010. Function-based question classification for general QA. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Em- pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1119-1128, Cambridge, MA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  5. Daniel Fernando Campos, Tri Nguyen, Mir Rosenberg, Xia Song, Jianfeng Gao, Saurabh Tiwary, Rangan Majumder, Li Deng, and Bhaskar Mitra. 2016. Ms marco: A human generated machine reading compre- hension dataset. ArXiv, abs/1611.09268. · arXiv
  6. Wenhu Chen, Hanwen Zha, Zhiyu Chen, Wenhan Xiong, Hong Wang, and William Yang Wang. 2020. Hy- bridQA: A dataset of multi-hop question answering over tabular and textual data. In Findings of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pages 1026-1036, Online. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI
  7. Angela Fan, Yacine Jernite, Ethan Perez, David Grang- ier, Jason Weston, and Michael Auli. 2019. ELI5: long form question answering. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28-August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Papers, pages 3558-3567. Association for Computational Linguis- tics. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Izzeddin Gur, Hiroki Furuta, Austin Huang, Mustafa Safdari, Yutaka Matsuo, Douglas Eck, and Aleksan- dra Faust. 2023. A real-world webagent with plan- ning, long context understanding, and program syn- thesis.
  9. Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W. White, Susan T. Dumais, and Yi-Min Wang. 2014. Struggling or exploring? dis- ambiguating long search sessions. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '14, page 53-62, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI
  10. Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Ryen W. White, Patrick Pan- tel, Susan T. Dumais, and Yi-Min Wang. 2014. Sup- porting complex search tasks. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM '14, page 829-838, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI
  11. Gautier Izacard and Edouard Grave. 2021. Leveraging passage retrieval with generative models for open do- main question answering. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 874-880, Online. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Jeff Johnson, Matthijs Douze, and Hervé Jégou. 2019. Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 7(3):535-547.
  13. Mandar Joshi, Eunsol Choi, Daniel Weld, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2017. triviaqa: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Compre- hension. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1705.03551. · arXiv
  14. C. T. Stayton. 2015. What does convergent evolution mean? the interpretation of convergence and its impli- cations in the search for limits to evolution. Interface Focus, 5(6):20150039. · DOI
  15. Harsh Trivedi, Niranjan Balasubramanian, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2022. MuSiQue: Multi- hop questions via single-hop question composition. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
  16. Yi Zhang, Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Julia Kiseleva, Ryen White, and Dan Roth. 2021. Learning to decom- pose and organize complex tasks. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 2726-2735, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI

Authors
Rosset, C., Chung, H.-L., Qin, G., Chau, E. C., Feng, Z., Awadallah, A., Neville, J., & Rao, N.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401065928
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
unknown unknowns, search engine query logs, GPT-4, question answering benchmark, slow thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review