Cited by 335Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

ELI5: long form question answering

Open access
Fan, Angela, Jernite, Yacine, Perez, Ethan, Grangier, David, Weston, Jason, Auli, Michael·2019·Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

We introduce the first large-scale corpus for long-form question answering, a task requiring elaborate and in-depth answers to openended questions.The dataset comprises 270K threads from the Reddit forum "Explain Like I'm Five" (ELI5) where an online community provides answers to questions which are comprehensible by five year olds.Compared to existing datasets, ELI5 comprises diverse questions requiring multi-sentence answers.We provide a large set of web documents to help answer the question.Automatic and human evaluations show that an abstractive model trained with a multi-task objective outperforms conventional Seq2Seq, language modeling, as well as a strong extractive baseline.However, our best model is still far from human performance since raters prefer gold responses in over 86% of cases, leaving ample opportunity for future improvement.1

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/p19-1346

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent long-form QA evaluations such as ELI5 and ASQA allow for more elaborate answers.

    “Recent years have seen the emergence of long-form QA evaluations, such as ELI5 (Fan et al., 2019) and ASQA (Stelmakh et al., 2022a), which allow for more elaborate answers.”

    From DebateQA: Evaluating Question Answering on Debatable Knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2019

  • LFQA contains LLMgenerated responses to questions from the ELI5 dataset.

    “LFQA (Chen et al., 2023) contains LLMgenerated responses to questions from the ELI5 (”

    From MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents (2024) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Myle Ott, Sergey Edunov, David Grangier, and Michael Auli. 2018. Scaling neural machine trans- lation. In WMT, pages 1-9. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics.
  2. Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra Birch. 2016. Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. In ACL.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, A., Jernite, Y., Perez, E., Grangier, D., Weston, J., & Auli, M.
Affiliations
  • Meta (United States) (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2019
Pages
3558-3567
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950681488
Cited by
319
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 7
FWCI
12.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
long-form question answering, Reddit, corpus construction, abstractive summarization, open-ended questions, multi-task learning, human evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review