The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diffusion Deepfake
Open accessAbstract
Recent progress in generative AI, primarily through diffusion models, presents significant challenges for real-world deepfake detection. The increased realism in image details, diverse content, and widespread accessibility to the general public complicates the identification of these sophisticated deepfakes. Acknowledging the urgency to address the vulnerability of current deepfake detectors to this evolving threat, our paper introduces two extensive deepfake datasets generated by state-of-the-art diffusion models as other datasets are less diverse and low in quality. Our extensive experiments also showed that our dataset is more challenging compared to the other face deepfake datasets. Our strategic dataset creation not only challenge the deepfake detectors but also sets a new benchmark for more evaluation. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals the struggle of existing detection methods, often optimized for specific image domains and manipulations, to effectively adapt to the intricate nature of diffusion deepfakes, limiting their practical utility. To address this critical issue, we investigate the impact of enhancing training data diversity on representative detection methods. This involves expanding the diversity of both manipulation techniques and image domains. Our findings underscore that increasing training data diversity results in improved generalizability. Moreover, we propose a novel momentum difficulty boosting strategy to tackle the additional challenge posed by training data heterogeneity. This strategy dynamically assigns appropriate sample weights based on learning difficulty, enhancing the model's adaptability to both easy and challenging samples. Extensive experiments on both existing and newly proposed benchmarks demonstrate that our model optimization approach surpasses prior alternatives significantly.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rise of diffusion-based forgery techniques [21] underscores the urgency for advanced defenses.
“The rise of diffusion-based forgery techniques [21] further underscores the urgency for advanced defenses tailored to increasingly sophisticated manipulations.”
From Comprehensive Evaluation of Deepfake Detection Models: Accuracy, Generalization, and Resilience to Adversarial Attacks (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Advanced detection techniques that address the dynamic and temporal structures of deepfake videos are still limited in number.
“Additionally, advanced detection techniques that address the dynamic and temporal structures of deepfake videos are still limited in number [16].”
From Enhancing Deepfake Detection Through Quantum Transfer Learning and Class-Attention Vision Transformer Architecture (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abbasi, M., Váz, P., Silva, J., & Martins, P. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15031225 · Cited by 32
Katı, B. E., Küçüksille, E. U., & Sarıman, G. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15020525 · Cited by 12
Evolving from Single-modal to Multi-modal Facial Deepfake Detection: Progress and Challenges
Liu, P., Tao, Q., & Zhou, J. T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.06965 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhattacharyya, C., Wang, H., Zhang, F., Kim, S., & Zhu, X.
- Affiliations
- Yeungnam University (KR)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2404.01579
- OpenAlex
- W4393928270
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, diffusion models, deepfake datasets, training data diversity, sample weighting, generative AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review