The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HGRN2: Gated Linear RNNs with State Expansion
Open accessAbstract
Hierarchically gated linear RNN (HGRN, \citealt{HGRN}) has demonstrated competitive training speed and performance in language modeling while offering efficient inference. However, the recurrent state size of HGRN remains relatively small, limiting its expressiveness. To address this issue, we introduce a simple outer product-based state expansion mechanism, which significantly enlarges the recurrent state size without introducing any additional parameters. This enhancement also provides a linear attention interpretation for HGRN2, enabling hardware-efficient training. Our extensive experiments verify the advantage of HGRN2 over HGRN consistently across different settings and competitive with other recurrent models.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To correct biased rounding error in flash attention, Kimi K3 adopts the method of [98] and keeps the attention output in FP32 during training.
“To correct the biased rounding error that arises in flash attention, we adopt the method of [98] and keep the attention output in FP32 during training.”
From Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as [98]
Conceptually the closest models to xLSTM are Retention, RWKV, and HGRN2.
“Conceptually the closest models to xLSTM are Retention (Sun et al., 2023), RWKV (Peng et al., 2023(Peng et al., , 2024)), and HGRN2 (Qin et al., 2024).”
From xLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as Qin et al., 2024
All presented sequence models in this work (Moneta, Memora, Yaad) as well as HGRN2 are placed outside the class of models that internally optimize regression loss, due to their different attentional bias.
“Furthermore, all presented sequence models in this work (e.g., Moneta, Memora, Yaad) as well as models like HGRN2 (Qin et al. 2024) are placed outside of this class of models, due to their different attentional bias.”
From It's All Connected: A Journey Through Test-Time Memorization, Attentional Bias, Retention, and Online Optimization (2025) · cites this paper as Qin et al. 2024
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
xLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memory
Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Spanring, M., Auer, A., Prudnikova, O., Kopp, M., Klambauer, G., Brandstetter, J., & Hochreiter, S. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-3417 · Cited by 286
xLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memory
Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Spanring, M., Auer, A., Prudnikova, O., Kopp, M., Klambauer, G., Brandstetter, J., & Hochreiter, S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.04517 · Cited by 299
WTxGRN: Wavelet Transform-Based Extended Gated Recurrent Network for Palm Vein Recognition
Qin, H., Fu, Y., Jing, C., Song, Q., Li, Y., El‐Yacoubi, M. A., & Zhong, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3592561 · Cited by 6
Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence
Kimi Team, Bai, T., Bai, Y., Bao, Y., C., M., Cai, J., Cai, X., Cao, P., Cao, Y., Chai, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.24653
“This parameterization is closely related to the lower-bounded recurrence gates in prior work [98, 27, 92].”
Gated DeltaNet-2: Decoupling Erase and Write in Linear Attention
Hatamizadeh, A., Choi, Y., & Kautz, J. (2026) · arXiv
“Gated linear attention and related linear RNNs further improve memory control with learned decay gates [17, 42].”
Behrouz, A., Razaviyayn, M., Zhong, P., & Mirrokni, V. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.13173 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, Z., Yang, S., Sun, W., Shen, X., Li, D., Sun, W., & Zhong, Y.
- Affiliations
- MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2404.07904
- OpenAlex
- W4394782164
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- state expansion, outer product, linear attention, language modeling, parameter-efficient inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
