AudioProtoPNet: An interpretable deep learning model for bird sound classification
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning models have significantly advanced acoustic bird monitoring by being able to recognize numerous bird species based on their vocalizations. However, traditional deep learning models are black boxes that provide no insight into their underlying computations, limiting their usefulness to ornithologists and machine learning engineers. Explainable models could facilitate debugging, knowledge discovery, trust, and interdisciplinary collaboration. This study introduces AudioProtoPNet, an adaptation of the Prototypical Part Network (ProtoPNet) for multi-label bird sound classification. It is an inherently interpretable model that uses a ConvNeXt backbone to extract embeddings, with the classification layer replaced by a prototype learning classifier trained on these embeddings. The classifier learns prototypical patterns of each bird species' vocalizations from spectrograms of training instances. During inference, audio recordings are classified by comparing them to the learned prototypes in the embedding space, providing explanations for the model's decisions and insights into the most informative embeddings of each bird species. The model was trained on the BirdSet training dataset, which consists of 9,734 bird species and over 6,800 hours of recordings. Its performance was evaluated on the seven test datasets of BirdSet, covering different geographical regions. AudioProtoPNet outperformed the state-of-the-art model Perch, achieving an average AUROC of 0.90 and a cmAP of 0.42, with relative improvements of 7.1% and 16.7% over Perch, respectively. These results demonstrate that even for the challenging task of multi-label bird sound classification, it is possible to develop powerful yet inherently interpretable deep learning models that provide valuable insights for ornithologists and machine learning engineers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deep-learning approaches often operate as black boxes, making it difficult to interpret the acoustic features driving classification decisions.
“deep-learning approaches often operate as black boxes, making it difficult to interpret the acoustic features driving classification decisions”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Heinrich et al. 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization
Loshchilov, I., & Hutter, F. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.05101 · Cited by 12,522 · see citing works
mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization
Zhang, H., Cisse, M., Dauphin, Y. N., & Lopez-Paz, D. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.09412 · Cited by 5,831 · see citing works
SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restarts
Loshchilov, I., & Hutter, F. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.03983 · Cited by 5,309 · see citing works
AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and UncertaintyPreprint
Hendrycks, D., Mu, N., Cubuk, E. D., Zoph, B., Gilmer, J., & Lakshminarayanan, B. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.02781 · Cited by 893 · see citing works
Toward Interpretable Music Tagging with Self-AttentionPreprint
Won, M., Chun, S., & Serra, X. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.04972 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Interpretable Image Classification with Adaptive Prototype-based Vision TransformersPreprint
Ma, C., Donnelly, J. P., Liu, W., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.20722 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
BIRB: A Generalization Benchmark for Information Retrieval in BioacousticsPreprint
Hamer, J., Triantafillou, E., van Merriënboer, B., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.07439 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
BirdSet: A Large-Scale Dataset for Audio Classification in Avian BioacousticsPreprint
Rauch, L., Schwinger, R., Wirth, M., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.10380 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationImproving Prototypical Visual Explanations with Reward Reweighing, Reselection, and RetrainingPreprint
Li, A. J., Netzorg, R., Cheng, Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.03887 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Kenneth V Rosenberg, Adriaan M Dokter, Peter J Blancher, John R Sauer, Adam C Smith, Paul A Smith, Jessica C Stanton, Arvind Panjabi, Laura Helft, Michael Parr, et al. Decline of the north american avifauna. Science, 366(6461):120-124, 2019.
- Robert Watson, Ivar Baste, Anne Larigauderie, Paul Leadley, Unai Pascual, Brigitte Baptiste, Sebsebe Demissew, Luthando Dziba, Günay Erpul, Asghar Fazel, et al. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES Secretariat: Bonn, Germany, pages 22-47, 2019.
- Stuart HM Butchart, Matt Walpole, Ben Collen, Arco Van Strien, Jörn PW Scharlemann, Rosamunde EA Almond, Jonathan EM Baillie, Bastian Bomhard, Claire Brown, John Bruno, et al. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328(5982):1164-1168, 2010.
- Çagan H Sekercioglu, Daniel G Wenny, and Christopher J Whelan. Why birds matter: avian ecological function and ecosystem services. University of Chicago Press, 2019.
- Samuel RP-J Ross, Darren P O'Connell, Jessica L Deichmann, Camille Desjonquères, Amandine Gasc, Jennifer N Phillips, Sarab S Sethi, Connor M Wood, and Zuzana Burivalova. Passive acoustic monitoring provides a fresh perspective on fundamental ecological questions. Functional Ecology, 37(4):959-975, 2023.
- Julia Shonfield and Erin M Bayne. Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications. Avian Conservation & Ecology, 12(1), 2017.
- Dan Stowell. Computational bioacoustics with deep learning: a review and roadmap. PeerJ, 10:e13152, 2022.
- Dan Stowell, Michael D Wood, Hanna Pamuła, Yannis Stylianou, and Hervé Glotin. Automatic acoustic detection of birds through deep learning: the first bird audio detection challenge. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(3):368-380, 2019.
- Robert Geirhos, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Claudio Michaelis, Richard Zemel, Wieland Brendel, Matthias Bethge, and Felix A Wichmann. Shortcut learning in deep neural networks. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(11):665-673, 2020.
- Brian L Sullivan, Christopher L Wood, Marshall J Iliff, Rick E Bonney, Daniel Fink, and Steve Kelling. ebird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological conservation, 142(10):2282-2292, 2009.
- Cynthia Rudin. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature machine intelligence, 1(5):206-215, 2019.
- Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. " why should i trust you?" explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 1135-1144, 2016.
- Oscar Li, Hao Liu, Chaofan Chen, and Cynthia Rudin. Deep learning for case-based reasoning through prototypes: A neural network that explains its predictions. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 32, 2018.
- Chaofan Chen, Oscar Li, Daniel Tao, Alina Barnett, Cynthia Rudin, and Jonathan K Su. This looks like that: deep learning for interpretable image recognition. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
- Daniel Griffin and Jae Lim. Signal estimation from modified short-time fourier transform. IEEE Transactions on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, 32(2):236-243, 1984.
- Nathanaël Perraudin, Peter Balazs, and Peter L Søndergaard. A fast griffin-lim algorithm. In 2013 IEEE workshop on applications of signal processing to audio and acoustics, pages 1-4. IEEE, 2013.
- Wencan Zhang and Brian Y Lim. Towards relatable explainable ai with the perceptual process. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1-24, 2022.
- Sören Becker, Marcel Ackermann, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Wojciech Samek. Interpreting and explaining deep neural networks for classification of audio signals. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03418, 2018. · arXiv
- Dominik Schiller, Tobias Huber, Florian Lingenfelser, Michael Dietz, Andreas Seiderer, and Elisabeth André. Relevance-based feature masking: Improving neural network based whale classification through explainable artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2019, pages 2423-2427. ISCA, 2019.
- Suk-Young Lim, Dong-Kyu Chae, and Sang-Chul Lee. Detecting deepfake voice using explainable deep learning techniques. Applied Sciences, 12(8):3926, 2022.
- Theekshana Dissanayake, Tharindu Fernando, Simon Denman, Sridha Sridharan, Houman Ghaemmaghami, and Clinton Fookes. A robust interpretable deep learning classifier for heart anomaly detection without segmentation. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 25(6):2162-2171, 2020.
- Katharina Weitz, Dominik Schiller, Ruben Schlagowski, Tobias Huber, and Elisabeth André. "let me explain!": exploring the potential of virtual agents in explainable ai interaction design. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 15(2):87-98, 2021.
- Deva Chaitanya Sanakkayala, Vijayakumar Varadarajan, Namya Kumar, Girija Soni, Pooja Kamat, Satish Kumar, Shruti Patil, and Ketan Kotecha. Explainable ai for bearing fault prognosis using deep learning techniques. Micromachines, 13(9):1471, 2022.
- Ankit Pal and Malaikannan Sankarasubbu. Pay attention to the cough: Early diagnosis of covid-19 using interpretable symptoms embeddings with cough sound signal processing. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 620-628, 2021.
- Jon Donnelly, Alina Jade Barnett, and Chaofan Chen. Deformable protopnet: An interpretable image classifier using deformable prototypes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10265-10275, 2022.
- Meike Nauta, Ron Van Bree, and Christin Seifert. Neural prototype trees for interpretable fine-grained image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 14933-14943, 2021.
- Jiaqi Wang, Huafeng Liu, Xinyue Wang, and Liping Jing. Interpretable image recognition by constructing transparent embedding space. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 895-904, 2021.
- Dawid Rymarczyk, Łukasz Struski, Michał Górszczak, Koryna Lewandowska, Jacek Tabor, and Bartosz Zieliński. Interpretable image classification with differentiable prototypes assignment. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 351-368. Springer, 2022.
- Mengqi Xue, Qihan Huang, Haofei Zhang, Lechao Cheng, Jie Song, Minghui Wu, and Mingli Song. Protopformer: Concentrating on prototypical parts in vision transformers for interpretable image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.10431, 2022. · arXiv
- Meike Nauta, Jörg Schlötterer, Maurice van Keulen, and Christin Seifert. Pip-net: Patch-based intuitive prototypes for interpretable image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2744-2753, 2023.
- Chiyu Ma, Brandon Zhao, Chaofan Chen, and Cynthia Rudin. This looks like those: Illuminating prototypical concepts using multiple visualizations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
- Zhao Ren, Thanh Tam Nguyen, and Wolfgang Nejdl. Prototype learning for interpretable respiratory sound analysis. In ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 9087-9091. IEEE, 2022.
- Pablo Zinemanas, Martín Rocamora, Marius Miron, Frederic Font, and Xavier Serra. An interpretable deep learning model for automatic sound classification. Electronics, 10(7):850, 2021.
- Xuanxin Liu, Zhibo Chen, Haiyan Zhang, Juhu Li, Qi Jiang, Lili Ren, and Youqing Luo. The interpretability of the activity signal detection model for wood-boring pests semanotus bifasciatus in the larval stage. Pest Management Science, 79(10):3830-3842, 2023.
- Russell A Mittermeier, Cristina G Mittermeier, Thomas M Brooks, John D Pilgrim, William R Konstant, Gus- tavo AB Da Fonseca, and Cyril Kormos. Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(18):10309-10313, 2003.
- Tal Ridnik, Emanuel Ben-Baruch, Nadav Zamir, Asaf Noy, Itamar Friedman, Matan Protter, and Lihi Zelnik- Manor. Asymmetric loss for multi-label classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 82-91, 2021.
- Daniel S Park, William Chan, Yu Zhang, Chung-Cheng Chiu, Barret Zoph, Ekin D Cubuk, and Quoc V Le. Specaugment: A simple data augmentation method for automatic speech recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08779, 2019. · arXiv
- Zhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer, Trevor Darrell, and Saining Xie. A convnet for the 2020s. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11976-11986, 2022.
- Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248-255. Ieee, 2009.
- Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 6105-6114. PMLR, 2019.
- Burooj Ghani, Tom Denton, Stefan Kahl, and Holger Klinck. Global birdsong embeddings enable superior transfer learning for bioacoustic classification. Scientific Reports, 13(1):22876, 2023.
- Amina Adadi and Mohammed Berrada. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (xai). IEEE access, 6:52138-52160, 2018.
- Brian S Miller, Shyam Madhusudhana, Meghan G Aulich, and Nat Kelly. Deep learning algorithm outperforms experienced human observer at detection of blue whale d-calls: a double-observer analysis. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 9(1):104-116, 2023.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation
Zsebők, S. (2026) · Biologia Futura · doi:10.1007/s42977-026-00322-5
“In addition, deep-learning approaches often operate as black boxes, making it difficult to interpret the acoustic features driving classification decisions (Heinrich et al. 2024; Potty 2024).”
- Authors
- Heinrich, R., Rauch, L., Sick, B., & Scholz, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Kassel (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Heinrich, René
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 87
- Pages
- 103081-103081
- ISSN
- 1574-9541 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2404.10420
- OpenAlex
- W4407867957
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 14.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecological Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- bird sound classification, explainable deep learning, prototype learning, multi-label classification, ConvNeXt, spectrogram, acoustic species identification, model explainability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review