PreprintCited by 34Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsMachine Learning in Healthcare

Advancing Multimodal Medical Capabilities of Gemini

Open access
Yang, Lin, Xu, Shawn, Sellergren, Andrew, Kohlberger, Timo, Zhou, Yuchen, Ktena, Ira, Kiraly, Atilla, Ahmed, Faruk +39 more·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Many clinical tasks require an understanding of specialized data, such as medical images and genomics, which is not typically found in general-purpose large multimodal models. Building upon Gemini's multimodal models, we develop several models within the new Med-Gemini family that inherit core capabilities of Gemini and are optimized for medical use via fine-tuning with 2D and 3D radiology, histopathology, ophthalmology, dermatology and genomic data. Med-Gemini-2D sets a new standard for AI-based chest X-ray (CXR) report generation based on expert evaluation, exceeding previous best results across two separate datasets by an absolute margin of 1% and 12%, where 57% and 96% of AI reports on normal cases, and 43% and 65% on abnormal cases, are evaluated as "equivalent or better" than the original radiologists' reports. We demonstrate the first ever large multimodal model-based report generation for 3D computed tomography (CT) volumes using Med-Gemini-3D, with 53% of AI reports considered clinically acceptable, although additional research is needed to meet expert radiologist reporting quality. Beyond report generation, Med-Gemini-2D surpasses the previous best performance in CXR visual question answering (VQA) and performs well in CXR classification and radiology VQA, exceeding SoTA or baselines on 17 of 20 tasks. In histopathology, ophthalmology, and dermatology image classification, Med-Gemini-2D surpasses baselines across 18 out of 20 tasks and approaches task-specific model performance. Beyond imaging, Med-Gemini-Polygenic outperforms the standard linear polygenic risk score-based approach for disease risk prediction and generalizes to genetically correlated diseases for which it has never been trained. Although further development and evaluation are necessary in the safety-critical medical domain, our results highlight the potential of Med-Gemini across a wide range of medical tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2405.03162

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providing the Indication to the model improves the quality of generated reports.

    “Empirically, providing the Indication to the model improves the quality of generated reports 11,12 and has become more commonplace.[13][14][15]”

    From MAIRA-2: Grounded Radiology Report Generation (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, L., Xu, S., Sellergren, A., Kohlberger, T., Zhou, Y., Ktena, I., Kiraly, A., Ahmed, F., Hormozdiari, F., Jaroensri, T., Wang, E., Wulczyn, E., Jamil, F., Guidroz, T., Lau, C., Qiao, S., Liu, Y., Goel, A., Park, K., Agharwal, A., George, N., Wang, Y., Tanno, R., Barrett, D. G. T., Weng, W.-H., Mahdavi, S. S., Saab, K., Tu, T., Kalidindi, S. R., Etemadi, M., Cuadros, J., Sorensen, G., Matias, Y., Chou, K., Corrado, G., Barral, J., Shetty, S., Fleet, D., Eslami, S. M. A., Tse, D., Prabhakara, S., McLean, C., Steiner, D., Pilgrim, R., Kelly, C., Azizi, S., & Golden, D.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396758996
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • DeepMind
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
large multimodal models, chest X-ray report generation, histopathological image classification, dermatological image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review