Advancing Multimodal Medical Capabilities of Gemini
Open accessAbstract
Many clinical tasks require an understanding of specialized data, such as medical images and genomics, which is not typically found in general-purpose large multimodal models. Building upon Gemini's multimodal models, we develop several models within the new Med-Gemini family that inherit core capabilities of Gemini and are optimized for medical use via fine-tuning with 2D and 3D radiology, histopathology, ophthalmology, dermatology and genomic data. Med-Gemini-2D sets a new standard for AI-based chest X-ray (CXR) report generation based on expert evaluation, exceeding previous best results across two separate datasets by an absolute margin of 1% and 12%, where 57% and 96% of AI reports on normal cases, and 43% and 65% on abnormal cases, are evaluated as "equivalent or better" than the original radiologists' reports. We demonstrate the first ever large multimodal model-based report generation for 3D computed tomography (CT) volumes using Med-Gemini-3D, with 53% of AI reports considered clinically acceptable, although additional research is needed to meet expert radiologist reporting quality. Beyond report generation, Med-Gemini-2D surpasses the previous best performance in CXR visual question answering (VQA) and performs well in CXR classification and radiology VQA, exceeding SoTA or baselines on 17 of 20 tasks. In histopathology, ophthalmology, and dermatology image classification, Med-Gemini-2D surpasses baselines across 18 out of 20 tasks and approaches task-specific model performance. Beyond imaging, Med-Gemini-Polygenic outperforms the standard linear polygenic risk score-based approach for disease risk prediction and generalizes to genetically correlated diseases for which it has never been trained. Although further development and evaluation are necessary in the safety-critical medical domain, our results highlight the potential of Med-Gemini across a wide range of medical tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Providing the Indication to the model improves the quality of generated reports.
“Empirically, providing the Indication to the model improves the quality of generated reports 11,12 and has become more commonplace.[13][14][15]”
From MAIRA-2: Grounded Radiology Report Generation (2024) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward expert-level medical question answering with large language models
Singhal, K., Tu, T., Gottweis, J., Sayres, R., Wulczyn, E., Amin, M., Hou, L., Clark, K., Pfohl, S. R., Cole-Lewis, H., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03423-7 · Cited by 1,734 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning the natural history of human disease with generative transformers
Shmatko, A., Jung, A. W., Gaurav, K., Brunak, S., Mortensen, L. H., Birney, E., Fitzgerald, T., & Gerstung, M. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09529-3 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Towards a holistic framework for multimodal LLM in 3D brain CT radiology report generation
Li, C.-Y., Chang, K.-J., Yang, C.-F., Wu, H.-Y., Chen, W., Bansal, H., Chen, L., Yang, Y.-P., Chen, Y.-C., Chen, S.-P., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57426-0 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“…as based on the work of Singhal et al.; 27 BrainGPT-template was fine-tuned using template instruction, involving a structured and predefined set of questions or points that need to be addressed; BrainGPT-keyword was fine-tuned using keyword instruction, focusing on essential areas or…”
MMedAgent: Learning to Use Medical Tools with Multi-modal Agent
Li, B., Yan, T., Pan, Y., Luo, J., Ji, R., Ding, J., Xu, Z., Liu, S., Dong, H., Lin, Z., et al. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.510 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationSellergren, A., Kazemzadeh, S., Jaroensri, T., Kiraly, A., Traverse, M., Kohlberger, T., Xu, S., Jamil, F., Hughes, C., Lau, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05201 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationFleurence, R. L., Bian, J., Wang, X., Xu, H., Dawoud, D., Higashi, M., & Chhatwal, J. (2025) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2024.10.3846 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
MAIRA-2: Grounded Radiology Report Generation
Bannur, S., Bouzid, K., Castro, D. C., Schwaighofer, A., Thieme, A., Bond-Taylor, S., Ilse, M., Pérez-García, F., Salvatelli, V., Sharma, H., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.04449 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“In Figures C.10 to C.13, we qualitatively compare on the examples shown in Yang et al. (2024), which were sourced from the MIMIC-CXR validation set.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Yang, L., Xu, S., Sellergren, A., Kohlberger, T., Zhou, Y., Ktena, I., Kiraly, A., Ahmed, F., Hormozdiari, F., Jaroensri, T., Wang, E., Wulczyn, E., Jamil, F., Guidroz, T., Lau, C., Qiao, S., Liu, Y., Goel, A., Park, K., Agharwal, A., George, N., Wang, Y., Tanno, R., Barrett, D. G. T., Weng, W.-H., Mahdavi, S. S., Saab, K., Tu, T., Kalidindi, S. R., Etemadi, M., Cuadros, J., Sorensen, G., Matias, Y., Chou, K., Corrado, G., Barral, J., Shetty, S., Fleet, D., Eslami, S. M. A., Tse, D., Prabhakara, S., McLean, C., Steiner, D., Pilgrim, R., Kelly, C., Azizi, S., & Golden, D.
- ORCID
- Yang, Lin
- Sellergren, Andrew
- Kohlberger, Timo
- Kiraly, Atilla
- Ahmed, Faruk
- Hormozdiari, Farhad
- Liu, Yun
- Agharwal, Arnav
- Wang, Yang
- Tanno, Ryutaro
- Barrett, David G. T.
- Weng, Wei-Hung
- Mahdavi, S. Sara
- Saab, Khaled
- Kalidindi, Sreenivasa Raju
- Etemadi, Mozziyar
- Cuadros, Jorge
- Matias, Yossi
- Chou, Katherine
- Corrado, Greg
- Barral, Joelle
- Shetty, Shravya
- Fleet, David
- Eslami, S. M. Ali
- Prabhakara, Shruthi
- McLean, Cory
- Pilgrim, Rory
- Kelly, Christopher
- Azizi, Shekoofeh
- Golden, Daniel
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2405.03162
- OpenAlex
- W4396758996
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 8
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- DeepMind
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- large multimodal models, chest X-ray report generation, histopathological image classification, dermatological image classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review