PreprintCited by 3Space Satellite Systems and ControlAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsSpacecraft Dynamics and Control

Leveraging Neural Radiance Fields for Pose Estimation of an Unknown Space Object during Proximity Operations

Open access
Legrand, Antoine, Detry, Renaud, De Vleeschouwer, Christophe·2024·arXiv

Abstract

We address the estimation of the 6D pose of an unknown target spacecraft relative to a monocular camera, a key step towards the autonomous rendezvous and proximity operations required by future Active Debris Removal missions. We present a novel method that enables an "off-the-shelf" spacecraft pose estimator, which is supposed to known the target CAD model, to be applied on an unknown target. Our method relies on an in-the wild NeRF, i.e., a Neural Radiance Field that employs learnable appearance embeddings to represent varying illumination conditions found in natural scenes. We train the NeRF model using a sparse collection of images that depict the target, and in turn generate a large dataset that is diverse both in terms of viewpoint and illumination. This dataset is then used to train the pose estimation network. We validate our method on the Hardware-In-the-Loop images of SPEED+ that emulate lighting conditions close to those encountered on orbit. We demonstrate that our method successfully enables the training of an off-the-shelf spacecraft pose estimation network from a sparse set of images. Furthermore, we show that a network trained using our method performs similarly to a model trained on synthetic images generated using the CAD model of the target.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2405.12728

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using a Lite-HRNet backbone in our method reduces the number of operations by a factor of 5 relative to the HRNet-based equivalent, while only doubling the errors.

    “Even, if this network is not as accurate as its HRNet-based [25] equivalent, it is less computationally intensive, i.e ., the number of operations is divided by 5, while only doubling the errors.”

    From Domain Generalization for In-Orbit 6D Pose Estimation (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Legrand, A., Detry, R., & De Vleeschouwer, C.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4398230838
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
Keywords
neural radiance fields, spacecraft pose estimation, proximity operations, autonomous rendezvous, active debris removal, monocular camera, appearance embedding, hardware-in-the-loop, speed, CAD models, synthetic image generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review