From Explicit CoT to Implicit CoT: Learning to Internalize CoT Step by Step
Open accessAbstract
When leveraging language models for reasoning tasks, generating explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) steps often proves essential for achieving high accuracy in final outputs. In this paper, we investigate if models can be taught to internalize these CoT steps. To this end, we propose a simple yet effective method for internalizing CoT steps: starting with a model trained for explicit CoT reasoning, we gradually remove the intermediate steps and finetune the model. This process allows the model to internalize the intermediate reasoning steps, thus simplifying the reasoning process while maintaining high performance. Our approach enables a GPT-2 Small model to solve 9-by-9 multiplication with up to 99% accuracy, whereas standard training cannot solve beyond 4-by-4 multiplication. Furthermore, our method proves effective on larger language models, such as Mistral 7B, achieving over 50% accuracy on GSM8K without producing any intermediate steps.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Latent reasoning can allow LLMs to reason more efficiently and flexibly, with fewer or no explicit textual intermediate steps.
“Building on the insight that latent reasoning can allow LLMs to reason more efficiently and flexibly, with fewer (or no) explicit textual intermediate steps, several new methods focus on compressing or replacing explicit CoT with more compact latent representations.”
From Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Breaking down the learning of continuous thoughts into multiple stages, inspired by iCoT, is very beneficial for training.
“These training methods can be combined to our framework, and specifically, we find that breaking down the learning of continuous thoughts into multiple stages, inspired by iCoT (Deng et al., 2024), is very beneficial for the training.”
From Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space (2024) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2024
Coconut surpasses the iCoT baseline on GSM8k.
“Particularly, it surpasses the latest baseline iCoT (Deng et al., 2024), which requires a more carefully designed training schedule.”
From Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space (2024) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Yonatan Belinkov. On internal language representations in deep learning: An analysis of machine translation and speech recognition. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018.
- BIG bench authors. Beyond the imitation game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023. ISSN 2835-8856. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=uyTL5Bvosj.
- Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019. URL https://openreview.net/forum? id=Bkg6RiCqY7.
- Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agent-based learning of materials datasets from the scientific literature
Ansari, M., & Moosavi, S. M. (2024) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d4dd00252k · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space
Hao, S., Sukhbaatar, S., Su, D., Li, X., Hu, Z., Weston, J., & Tian, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.06769 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“These training methods can be combined to our framework, and specifically, we find that breaking down the learning of continuous thoughts into multiple stages, inspired by iCoT (Deng et al., 2024), is very beneficial for the training.”
InfluentialStop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
Sui, Y., Chuang, Y.-N., Wang, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Yuan, J., Liu, H., Wen, A., Zhong, S., Zou, N., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Although standard CoT methods improve LLM performance by explicitly writing reasoning steps, recent work [24] has shown that simply adding intermediate “thinking” tokens, or even meaningless filler (e.g., “......”)”
Rouam, A., & Buvet, P.-A. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07989-3_9
Feasibility Study on Reactor Preliminary Design via Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
Zhang, B., Lai, W., Huang, H., Ren, J., Chen, Q., Zhang, B., & He, C. (2026) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.6c00091
- Authors
- Deng, Y., Choi, Y., & Shieber, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- University of Washington (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2405.14838
- OpenAlex
- W4398886776
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2134012)
- Harvard University
- Office of Naval Research (N00014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- chain-of-thought reasoning, large language models, mathematical reasoning, GSM8K, GPT-2, Mistral-7B
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
