Vista: A Generalizable Driving World Model with High Fidelity and Versatile Controllability
Open accessAbstract
World models can foresee the outcomes of different actions, which is of paramount importance for autonomous driving. Nevertheless, existing driving world models still have limitations in generalization to unseen environments, prediction fidelity of critical details, and action controllability for flexible application. In this paper, we present Vista, a generalizable driving world model with high fidelity and versatile controllability. Based on a systematic diagnosis of existing methods, we introduce several key ingredients to address these limitations. To accurately predict real-world dynamics at high resolution, we propose two novel losses to promote the learning of moving instances and structural information. We also devise an effective latent replacement approach to inject historical frames as priors for coherent long-horizon rollouts. For action controllability, we incorporate a versatile set of controls from high-level intentions (command, goal point) to low-level maneuvers (trajectory, angle, and speed) through an efficient learning strategy. After large-scale training, the capabilities of Vista can seamlessly generalize to different scenarios. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets show that Vista outperforms the most advanced general-purpose video generator in over 70% of comparisons and surpasses the best-performing driving world model by 55% in FID and 27% in FVD. Moreover, for the first time, we utilize the capacity of Vista itself to establish a generalizable reward for real-world action evaluation without accessing the ground truth actions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing generative models for autonomous driving typically support only a subset of the required capabilities, such as limited conditioning types, lack of multi-camera generation, or poor spatial-temporal coherence.
“However, existing models typically support only a subset of the required capabilities, such as limited conditioning types, lack of multi-camera generation, or poor spatial-temporal coherence.”
From GAIA-2: A Controllable Multi-View Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
GAIA-1: A Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving
Hu, A., Russell, L., Yeo, H., Murez, Z., Fedoseev, G., Kendall, A., Shotton, J., & Corrado, G. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.17080 · Cited by 28 · cited 10× · see citing works
“Although a primary prospect of world models is to enable the generalization ability to novel environments, existing driving world models are still constrained by data scale [90, 125, 127, 143, 147] and geographical coverage [54, 61].”
Influential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding World or Predicting Future? A Comprehensive Survey of World Models
Ding, J., Zhang, Y., Shang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zong, Z., Feng, J., Yuan, Y., Su, H., Li, N., Sukiennik, N., et al. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3746449 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
How Far is Video Generation from World Model: A Physical Law Perspective
Kang, B., Yue, Y., Lu, R., Lin, Z., Zhao, Y., Wang, K., Huang, G., & Feng, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.02385 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“For example, in autonomous driving (Hu et al., 2023; Jia et al., 2023; Gao et al., 2024; Zheng et al., 2024), the condition is the driver’s operations, while in robot world models (Yang et al., 2023; Black et al., 2023; 1xw, 2024), the condition is often the control signals.”
GAIA-2: A Controllable Multi-View Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving
Russell, L., Hu, A., Bertoni, L., Fedoseev, G., Shotton, J., Arani, E., & Corrado, G. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.20523 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“In the context of autonomous driving, several models have introduced task-specific conditioning mechanisms [5, 6, 7, 8, 9], enabling some control over scenario elements.”
- Authors
- Gao, S., Yang, J., Chen, L., Chitta, K., Qiu, Y., Geiger, A., Zhang, J., & Li, H.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2405.17398
- OpenAlex
- W4399144322
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- autonomous driving, video generation, generalization to unseen environments, structural information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review