Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalization
Open accessAbstract
The concept of persona, originally adopted in dialogue literature, has re-surged as a promising framework for tailoring large language models (LLMs) to specific context (e.g., personalized search, LLM-as-a-judge). However, the growing research on leveraging persona in LLMs is relatively disorganized and lacks a systematic taxonomy. To close the gap, we present a comprehensive survey to categorize the current state of the field. We identify two lines of research, namely (1) LLM Role-Playing, where personas are assigned to LLMs, and (2) LLM Personalization, where LLMs take care of user personas. Additionally, we introduce existing methods for LLM personality evaluation. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first survey for role-playing and personalization in LLMs under the unified view of persona. We continuously maintain a paper collection to foster future endeavors: https://github.com/MiuLab/PersonaLLM-Survey
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs' inability to retain and retrieve relevant information from long-term interactions limits their effectiveness in applications requiring sustained personalization.
“Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in open-ended dialogue, yet their inability to retain and retrieve relevant information from long-term interactions limits their effectiveness in applications requiring sustained personalization.”
From In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Tseng et al., 2024
Cites
Self-collaboration code generation via ChatGPT
Dong, Y., Jiang, X., Jin, Z., & Li, G. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3672459 · Cited by 256 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition to the above environments, several research also proposes general frameworks applicable to different environments (§2.2.6).”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards lifelong dialogue agents via timeline-based memory management
Ong, K. T.-I., Kim, N., Gwak, M., Chae, H., Kwon, T., Jo, Y., Hwang, S.-W., Lee, D., & Yeo, J. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.435 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue Agents
Tan, Z., Yan, J., Hsu, I.-H., Han, R., Wang, Z., Le, L. T., Song, Y., Chen, Y., Palangi, H., Lee, G., et al. (2025) · arXiv
“However, collecting substantial annotations for training a personalized system for long-term use is hard (Tseng et al., 2024).”
Self-citationCaring Without Feeling: Affective Dynamics as the Control Layer of Human-AI Agent Collaboration
Xu, J., Wu, X., Zhang, Z., Xu, Y., Yang, Y., Zhu, J., Xiao, L., Wu, W., & He, L. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.18259
“Persona prompting can produce measurable trait-like shifts, but stability remains contingent on prompts, context length and safety policy [45, 46].”
WebAgent-R1: Training Web Agents via End-to-End Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning
Wei, Z., Yao, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Lu, Q., Qiu, L., Yu, C., Xu, P., Zhang, C., Yin, B., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.16421
- Authors
- Tseng, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-C., Hsiao, T.-Y., Chen, W.-L., Huang, C.-W., Meng, Y., & Chen, Y.-N.
- Affiliations
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 16612-16631
- arXiv
- 2406.01171
- OpenAlex
- W4404781205
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 25.12
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Taiwan University (113L900902, 113L900903)
- National Science and Technology Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Persona Design and Applications
- Keywords
- personas, large language models, LLM personalization, personality assessment, personalized search, LLM-as-a-judge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
