PreprintCited by 182Web Data Mining and AnalysisReinforcement Learning in RoboticsInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

WebAgent-R1: Training Web Agents via End-to-End Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Wei, Zhepei, Yao, Wenlin, Liu, Yao, Zhang, Weizhi, Lu, Qin, Qiu, Liang, Yu, Changlong, Xu, Puyang +4 more·2025·arXiv

Abstract

While reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated remarkable success in enhancing large language models (LLMs), it has primarily focused on single-turn tasks such as solving math problems. Training effective web agents for multi-turn interactions remains challenging due to the complexity of long-horizon decision-making across dynamic web interfaces. In this work, we present WebAgent-R1, a simple yet effective end-to-end multi-turn RL framework for training web agents. It learns directly from online interactions with web environments by asynchronously generating diverse trajectories, entirely guided by binary rewards depending on task success. Experiments on the WebArena-Lite benchmark demonstrate the effectiveness of WebAgent-R1, boosting the task success rate of Qwen-2.5-3B from 6.1% to 33.9% and Llama-3.1-8B from 8.5% to 44.8%, significantly outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods and strong proprietary models such as OpenAI o3. In-depth analyses reveal the effectiveness of the thinking-based prompting strategy and test-time scaling through increased interactions for web tasks. We further investigate different RL initialization policies by introducing two variants, namely WebAgent-R1-Zero and WebAgent-R1-CoT, which highlight the importance of the warm-up training stage (i.e., behavior cloning) and provide insights on incorporating long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in web agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2505.16421

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reinforcement learning has recently shown strong potential for aligning LLM behavior with high-level objectives, including tool use, web navigation, and search optimization.

    “Reinforcement learning (RL), in contrast, has recently shown strong potential for aligning LLM behavior with high-level objectives, including tool use (Qian et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025), web navigation (Wei et al., 2025), and search optimization (Jin et al., 2025; Song et al., 2025).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Zhendong Chu, Shen Wang, Jian Xie, Tinghui Zhu, Yibo Yan, Jinheng Ye, Aoxiao Zhong, Xuming Hu, Jing Liang, Philip S Yu, and 1 others. 2025. LLM agents for education: Advances and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11733. · arXiv
  2. Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shi- rong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, and 1 others. 2025. Deepseek-R1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948. · arXiv
  3. Hongliang He, Wenlin Yao, Kaixin Ma, Wenhao Yu, Yong Dai, Hongming Zhang, Zhenzhong Lan, and Dong Yu. 2024a. Webvoyager: Building an end-to- end web agent with large multimodal models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 6864-6890.
  4. Wenyi Hong, Weihan Wang, Qingsong Lv, Jiazheng Xu, Wenmeng Yu, Junhui Ji, Yan Wang, Zihan Wang, Yuxiao Dong, Ming Ding, and 1 others. 2024. Coga- gent: A visual language model for gui agents. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14281-14290.
  5. PMLR.
  6. Kenton Lee, Mandar Joshi, Iulia Raluca Turc, Hexi- ang Hu, Fangyu Liu, Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Ur- vashi Khandelwal, Peter Shaw, Ming-Wei Chang, and Kristina Toutanova. 2023. Pix2struct: Screen- shot parsing as pretraining for visual language under- standing. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 18893-18912.
  7. PMLR.
  8. Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, and 1 others. 2021. WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09332. · arXiv
  9. Liangbo Ning, Ziran Liang, Zhuohang Jiang, Haohao Qu, Yujuan Ding, Wenqi Fan, Xiao-yong Wei, Shanru Lin, Hui Liu, Philip S Yu, and 1 others. 2025. A sur- vey of webagents: Towards next-generation ai agents for web automation with large foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23350. · arXiv
  10. Samyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, and Yuxiong He. 2020. Zero: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models. In SC20: International Conference for High Performance Com- puting, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pages 1- 16. IEEE.
  11. Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, Y Wu, and 1 others. 2024. Deepseek- math: Pushing the limits of mathematical reason- ing in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300. · arXiv
  12. Peter Shaw, Mandar Joshi, James Cohan, Jonathan Be- rant, Panupong Pasupat, Hexiang Hu, Urvashi Khan- delwal, Kenton Lee, and Kristina N Toutanova. 2023. From pixels to ui actions: Learning to follow in- structions via graphical user interfaces. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:34354- 34370.
  13. Mohit Shridhar, Jesse Thomason, Daniel Gordon, Yonatan Bisk, Winson Han, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Dieter Fox. 2020. Alfred: A bench- mark for interpreting grounded instructions for ev- eryday tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10740-10749.
  14. Huatong Song, Jinhao Jiang, Yingqian Min, Jie Chen, Zhipeng Chen, Wayne Xin Zhao, Lei Fang, and Ji- Rong Wen. 2025. R1-searcher: Incentivizing the search capability in LLMs via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05592. · arXiv
  15. Kimi Team, Angang Du, Bofei Gao, Bowei Xing, Changjiu Jiang, Cheng Chen, Cheng Li, Chenjun Xiao, Chenzhuang Du, Chonghua Liao, and 1 others. 2025. Kimi k1. 5: Scaling reinforcement learning with llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12599. · arXiv
  16. Zora Zhiruo Wang, Jiayuan Mao, Daniel Fried, and Graham Neubig. 2024b. Agent workflow memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07429. · arXiv
  17. Qingyun Wu, Gagan Bansal, Jieyu Zhang, Yiran Wu, Beibin Li, Erkang Zhu, Li Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Shaokun Zhang, Jiale Liu, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Ryen W White, Doug Burger, and Chi Wang. 2024. Autogen: Enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversations. In First Conference on Language Modeling.
  18. Ke Yang, Yao Liu, Sapana Chaudhary, Rasool Fakoor, Pratik Chaudhari, George Karypis, and Huzefa Rang- wala. 2025b. AgentOccam: A simple yet strong base- line for LLM-based web agents. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representa- tions.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, Z., Yao, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Lu, Q., Qiu, L., Yu, C., Xu, P., Zhang, C., Yin, B., Yun, H., & Li, L.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416451824
Cited by
0
References
64
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
web agents, multi-turn reinforcement learning, large language models, end-to-end learning, long-horizon decision-making, chain-of-thought reasoning, behavior cloning, warm-up, test-time scaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review