CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 25Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in EducationDigital Education and Society

Generative AI and Power Imbalances in Global Education: Frameworks for Bias Mitigation

Open access
Nyaaba, Matthew, Wright, Alyson, Choi, Gyu Lim·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2406.02966arXiv 2406.02966
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study examines how Generative Artificial Intelligence reproduces global power hierarchies in education and proposes a framework to address resulting inequities. Using a critical qualitative design, the study conducted zero-shot prompt testing with two leading systems, ChatGPT-4 Turbo and Gemini 1.5, and collected real-time outputs from Global North and South contexts. A critical interpretive analysis traced textual, visual, and structural patterns that revealed forms of digital neocolonialism and their implications for educational equity. Findings show six ways in which GenAI can reinforce Western dominance. Western curriculum assumptions appeared when Gemini listed the same four seasons for the United States and Ghana, reflecting Western climatology and overlooking regional knowledge systems. Other patterns included cultural stereotyping in imagery, Western-centered examples in instructional outputs, limited support for Indigenous and local languages, underrepresentation of non-Western identities in visuals, and access barriers linked to subscription-based models. These patterns demonstrate how GenAI can reproduce inequities even as it introduces new educational opportunities. In response, the study proposes a dual-pathway mitigation model. The Inclusive AI Design pathway includes three components: liberatory design methods that center non-Western epistemologies, anticipatory approaches to reduce representational harm, and decentralized GenAI hubs that support local participation and data sovereignty. The pedagogical pathway, human-centric prompt engineering, equips educators to contextualize prompts and critically engage with outputs. Together, these pathways position GenAI as a tool that can support more equitable and culturally responsive education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2406.02966

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GenAI's infrastructures frequently extend long-standing dynamics of control-data colonialism-embedding corporate and state authority into systems trained on Indigenous languages and cultural materials.

    “These cases reveal that GenAI's infrastructures frequently extend long-standing dynamics of controlwhat Couldry and Mejias (2019) term data colonialismembedding corporate and state authority into systems trained on Indigenous languages and cultural materials (Nemorin, 2024;Nyaaba et al., 2024).”

    From Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings (2026) · cites this paper as Nyaaba et al., 2024

    The Introduction and Digital Neocolonialism sections describe GenAI as reproducing historical power imbalances through corporate and national control of technology and data. But the paper does not establish that corporate or state authority is embedded in systems trained on Indigenous languages and cultural materials. Its Decentralizing GenAI Hubs section instead describes a Māori-led language project designed to retain community control of its data. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. Adam, T. (2019). Digital neocolonialism and massive open online courses (MOOCs): colonial pasts and neoliberal futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(3), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1640740 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Alexander, R. J. (2001). Border Crossings: Towards a Comparative Pedagogy. Comparative Education, 37(4), 507-523. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3099559
  3. Athanassopoulos, S., Manoli, P., Gouvi, M., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2023). The use of ChatGPT as a learning tool to improve foreign language writing in a multilingual and multicultural classroom. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(2), 818-824. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2023.02.009 · DOI
  4. Arora, A., Barrett, M., Lee, E., Oborn, E., & Prince, K. (2023). Risk and the future of AI: Algorithmic bias, data colonialism, and marginalization. Information and Organization, 33(3), 100478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100478 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bentley, S. V., Naughtin, C. K., McGrath, M. J., Irons, J. L., & Cooper, P. S. (2024). The digital divide in action: How experiences of digital technology shape future relationships with artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wd4tr · DOI
  6. Brand, D. J. (2023). Ensuring the ethical development and use of AI in local governance. Journal of Ethics & Legal Technologies, 5, 95-109. https://jelt.padovauniversitypress.it/2023/2/6
  7. Buehring, J. H., & Liedtka, J. (2018). Embracing systematic futures thinking at the intersection of strategic planning, foresight and design. Journal of Innovation Management, 6, 134-152. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_006. · DOI
  8. 003_0006 · DOI
  9. Calzati, S. (2021). Decolonising "data colonialism": Propositions for investigating the realpolitik of today's networked ecology. Television & New Media, 22(8), 914-929. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367853624-3 · DOI
  10. Carmel, E., & Paul, R. (2022). Peace and prosperity for the digital age? The colonial political economy of European AI governance. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 41, 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2022.3173340 · DOI
  11. Cave, S., & Dihal, K. (2020). The whiteness of AI. Philosophy & Technology, 33(4), 685-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00415-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chaves, A. P., & Gerosa, M. A. (2021). How should my chatbot interact? A survey on social characteristics in human-chatbot interaction design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(8), 729-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Chen, B., Zhang, Z., Langrené, N., & Zhu, S. (2023). Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering in large language models: A comprehensive review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.14735. · arXiv
  14. Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). A holistic approach to the design of artificial intelligence (AI) education for K-12 schools. TechTrends, 65, 796-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00637-1 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Coleman, D. (2018). Digital colonialism: The 21st-century scramble for Africa through the extraction and control of user data and the limitations of data protection laws. Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 24, 417. https://doi.org/10.36643/mjrl.24.2.digital Council of Europe. (2022). Council of Europe and artificial intelligence. · DOI
  16. Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. (2008). Perspective-Rigor and relevance in organization studies: Idea migration and academic journal evolution. Organization Science, 19(2), 177-183. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0346 · DOI
  17. Denny, P., et al. (2023). In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (V. 1, pp. 296-302).
  18. Denny, P., Leinonen, J., Prather, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Amarouche, T., Becker, B. A., & Reeves, B. N. (2024). Prompt problems: A new programming exercise for the generative AI era. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (Vol. 1, pp. 296-302). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630909 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ding, A.-C. E., Shi, L., Yang, H., & Choi, I. (2024). Enhancing teacher AI literacy and integration through different types of cases in teacher professional development. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100178 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Dong, X., Hong, Y., Chen, X., Li, W., Zhang, M., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Neural question generation with semantics of question type. In M. Zhang, V. Ng, D. Zhao, S. Li, & H. Zan (Eds.), Natural language processing and Chinese computing: 7th CCF International Conference, NLPCC 2018, Hohhot, China, August 26-30, 2018, proceedings, Part II (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11109, pp. 213-223). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99501-4_18 · DOI
  21. Dorton, S. L., Ministero, L. M., Alaybek, B., & Bryant, D. J. (2023). Foresight for ethical AI. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1143907. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1143907 · DOI
  22. Ekin, S. (2023). Prompt engineering for ChatGPT: A quick guide to techniques, tips, and best practices. Authorea Preprints. https://www.techrxiv.org/users/690417/articles/681648-prompt-engineering- for-chatgpt-a-quick-guide-to-techniques-tips-and-best-practices
  23. Emenike, N. W., & Plowright, D. (2017). Third culture indigenous kids: Neo-colonialism and student identities in Nigerian international schools. Journal of Research in International Education, 16(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240917692757 · DOI
  24. Enriquez, G., Gill, V., Campano, G., Flores, T. T., Jones, S., Leander, K. M., McKnight, L., & Price- Dennis, D. (2024). Generative AI and composing: An intergenerational conversation among literacy scholars. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 23(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-08-2023-0104 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Enein, G. F. R. A. (2023). Post-colonialism and the digital age. Journal of Namibian Studies: History, Politics and Culture, 38, 262-277. https://namibian-studies.com/index.php/JNS/article/view/5370
  26. Fishman, D. A. (2004). Mainstreaming ethnicity: Horace Kallen, the strategy of transcendence, and cultural pluralism. Southern Journal of Communication, 69(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940409373286 · DOI
  27. Furuhata, Y. (2022). Climatic media: Transpacific experiments in atmospheric control. Duke University Press.
  28. Gaskins, N. (2023). Interrogating algorithmic bias: From speculative fiction to liberatory design. TechTrends, 67(4), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00783-0 · DOI
  29. Ge, X., Xu, C., Misaki, D., Markus, H. R., & Tsai, J. L. (2024). How culture shapes what people want from AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05104. · arXiv
  30. Gerbrandy, A., & Phoa, P. (2022). In Wealth and Power (pp. 166-185). Routledge.
  31. Gravett, W. H. (2022). Digital neocolonialism: The Chinese surveillance state in Africa. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 30(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2022.0393 · DOI
  32. Harrington, C. N., & Piper, A. M. (2018). Informing design through sociocultural values: Co-creation with low-income African-American older adults. Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (pp. 294-298). https://doi.org/10.1145/3240925.3240966 · DOI
  33. Holland, A., & Ciachir, C. (2024). A qualitative study of students' lived experience and perceptions of using ChatGPT: Immediacy, equity and integrity. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2350655 · DOI
  34. Issaka, C. A., Nyaaba, M., & Iddrisu, F. A. (2022). Attitudes and concerns of pre-service teachers about inclusive education enshrined in the new four-year basic education curriculum in Ghana. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(6), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.1.239 · DOI
  35. Ipek Z.-H., Gözüm, A.-C.-I., Papadakis, St., & Kalogı̇annakı̇s, M. (2023). Educational applications of ChatGPT, an AI system: A systematic review research, Educational Process, 12(3), 26-55, https://dx.doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.123. · DOI
  36. Jin, D., & Cao, J. (2018). "Perspective" -A new approach to serve our Light community. Light: Science & Applications, 7, 89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-018-0085-y · DOI
  37. Karakose, T., Demirkol, M., Aslan, N., Köse, H., & Yirci, R. (2023). A Conversation with ChatGPT about the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Education: Comparative Review Based on Human-AI Collaboration. Educational Process, 12(3), 7-25.
  38. Khazanchi, R., & Khazanchi, P. (2024). Generative AI to improve special education teacher preparation for inclusive classrooms. In M. Searson, E. Langran, & J. Trumble (Eds.), Exploring new horizons: Generative artificial intelligence and teacher education. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  39. Kitsara, I. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the digital divide: From an innovation perspective. In A. Bounfour (Ed.), Platforms and artificial intelligence: The next generation of competences (pp. 245-265). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90192-9 · DOI
  40. Kwet, M. (2019). Digital colonialism: South Africa's education transformation in the shadow of Silicon Valley (Doctoral dissertation, Rhodes University). Rhodes University Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/93767
  41. Langmia, K., & Sani, M. H. (2023). Decolonizing the African mind in the digital space. In U. S. Akpan (Ed.), African media space and globalization (pp. 343-354). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35060-3 · DOI
  42. Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: A.K.A. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751 Latif, E., et al. (2023). Artificial general intelligence (AGI) for education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12479. · DOI
  43. Lee, G.-G., & Zhai, X. (2024). Using ChatGPT for science learning: A study on pre-service teachers' lesson planning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1683-1700. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3401457 · DOI
  44. Lee, S. C., & Kang, K. (2024). The effect of 'Integrated Science Logic & Essay' class using generative AI on technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service science teachers. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 27, 133-155. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2024.27.1.133 · DOI
  45. Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21, 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Lynch, R., Young, J. C., Jowaisas, C., Sam, J., Boakye-Achampong, S., Garrido, M., & Rothschild, C. (2023). 'The tears don't give you funding': Data neocolonialism in development in the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 44(5), 911-929. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2166482 · DOI
  47. Menon, S. (2023). Postcolonial differentials in algorithmic bias: Challenging digital neo-colonialism in Africa. SCRIPTed: A Journal of Law, Technology & Society, 20, 383-399. https://doi.org/10.2218/scrip.20.2.2023.8980 · DOI
  48. Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023, March 17). Using AI to implement effective teaching strategies in classrooms: Five strategies, including prompts. The Wharton School Research Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4391243 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
  50. Nyaaba, M. (2023). Comparing human and AI's (GPT-4 and Gemini) understanding of the nature of science (SSRN Working Paper No. 4661602). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4661602
  51. Nyaaba, M., Kyeremeh, P., Majialuwe, E. K., Owusu-Fordjour, C., & Asebiga, E. (2024). Generative AI in academic research: A descriptive study on awareness, gender usage, and views among pre- service teachers. Journal of AI, 8(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1400867 · DOI
  52. Nyaaba, M., & Zhai, X. (2024a). Developing custom GPTs for education: Bridging cultural and contextual divide in generative AI (SSRN Working Paper No. 5074403). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5074403
  53. Nyaaba, M., & Zhai, X. (2024b). Generative AI professional development needs for teacher educators. Journal of AI, 8, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1385915 · DOI
  54. Owoahene Acheampong, K., & Nyaaba, M. (2024). Review of qualitative research in the era of generative artificial intelligence. SSRN Electronic Journal.. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4686920 · DOI
  55. Rahman, A. (2020). Postcolonialism and the digital age. SAGE Publications.
  56. Ragnedda, M. (2020). New digital inequalities: Algorithms divide. In Enhancing digital equity: Connecting the digital underclass (pp. 61-83). Routledge.
  57. Rasul, T., et al. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Sanusi, I. T., & Olaleye, S. A. (2022). An insight into cultural competence and ethics in K-12 artificial intelligence education. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 790-794. https://doi.org/10.1109/educon52537.2022.9766818 · DOI
  59. Sarı, T., Nayir, F., & Bozkurt, A. (2024). Reimagining education: Bridging artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and critical pedagogy. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 7, 102-115. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1308022 · DOI
  60. Share, J., Mamikonyan, T., & Lopez, E. (2019). Critical media literacy in teacher education, theory, and practice. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1404 · DOI
  61. Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: A review of benefits and risks. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378735 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Van Niekerk, D., et al. (2024). Challenging systematic prejudices: An investigation into bias against women and girls. Manuscript in press.
  63. Zembylas, M. (2023). A decolonial approach to AI in higher education teaching and learning: Strategies for undoing the ethics of digital neocolonialism. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.2010094 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Zhai, X., Nyaaba, M., & Ma, W. (2024). Can generative AI and ChatGPT outperform humans on cognitive-demanding problem-solving tasks in science? Science & Education, 33, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00496-1 · DOI
  65. Zhang, Y., & Cao, L. (2023). Exploring the potential presence of colonialism in the digital art field from a global perspective. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research, 8, 66-76. https://doi.org/10.56028/aehssr.8.1.66.2023 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nyaaba, M., Wright, A., & Choi, G. L.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2406.02966
arXiv
2406.02966
OpenAlex
W4399453660
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
Keywords
generative AI in education, power imbalance, educational equity, bias mitigation, Western epistemology, cultural stereotyping, indigenous languages, non-Western epistemologies, data sovereignty, prompt engineering, Gemini 1.5, Global North and Global South, inclusive AI design, cultural responsiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review