Turning up the heat: Min-p sampling for creative and coherent llm outputs

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Min-p sampling has been adopted by popular open-source LLM frameworks, including Hugging Face Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, and many others.

“Min-p sampling has been adopted by popular open-source LLM frameworks, including Hugging Face Transformers, VLLM, and many others, highlighting its considerable impact on improving text generation quality.”

• Also stated in: § 3.4 IMPLEMENTATION DETAILS · plain

  “Min-p sampling has been implemented as a logits processor in frameworks like Hugging Face Transformers (Wolf et al., 2020) and , vLLM (Kwon et al., 2023).”

• Also stated in: § Availability of Resources · plain

  “Min-p sampling has been integrated in widely-used open-source frameworks such as Hugging Face Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and many others repositories (Zheng et al., 2024), which collectively have accrued over 667,000 GitHub stars.”

• cites Wolf et al., 2020Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Kwon et al., 2023 sourceCould not verify

  The Parallel sampling and §5 Implementation passages describe vLLM’s sampling support and its use of Transformers, but neither mentions min-p sampling. Searches for “min-p sampling” and its adoption by the named frameworks found no passage addressing the claim; the copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.76)

  Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
• cites Zheng et al., 2024Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The rapid adoption of min-p by the open-source LLM community demonstrates its perceived utility and practical benefits.

“The rapid adoption of min-p by the open-source LLM community highlights its practical benefits, even for large reasoning models such as Deepseek R1 (DeepSeek-AI et al., 2025).”

• Also stated in: § Availability of Resources · boosted

  “While framework popularity reflects many factors, the rapid adoption of min-p demonstrates its perceived utility by developers and researchers, and its availability to the community.”

• cites DeepSeek-AI et al., 2025 sourceCould not verify

  The paper identifies DeepSeek-R1 as a reasoning model, but our copy does not discuss min-p or its adoption by the open-source LLM community. A search for min-p and related sampling terms found that the Experiment Setup (D.1) specifies top-p sampling for evaluation, not evidence of min-p’s practical benefits. (LLM, conf=0.76)

  Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

There are multiple, unaffiliated and independent replications of the benchmarks and claims presented in this paper.

“Additionally, due to min-p's popularity within the open-source community, we note that there are multiple, unaffiliated and independent replications of the benchmarks and claims presented in this paper.”

• cites Tang et al., 2024 sourcePartly supported

  The Setup (§4.1; page unavailable) and performance tables show that this paper independently evaluates min-p against other sampling methods on four reasoning datasets. Our copy does not establish that these experiments replicate the citing paper’s specific benchmarks and claims, or that this source demonstrates multiple unaffiliated replications. (LLM, conf=0.82)

  Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
• cites Gusev, 2023Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Gusev, 2024Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Min-p has been implemented as a logits processor in Hugging Face Transformers and vLLM.

“Min-p sampling has been implemented as a logits processor in frameworks like Hugging Face Transformers (Wolf et al., 2020) and , vLLM (Kwon et al., 2023).”

• cites Wolf et al., 2020Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Kwon et al., 2023 sourceCould not verify

  The Implementation and Supporting Various Decoding Algorithms sections describe vLLM and its sampling capabilities, but do not say it implements min-p sampling as a logits processor. Searches for “min-p sampling,” “logits processor,” and “minimum probability sampling” found no passage addressing that implementation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

  Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Tajwar et al. implemented min-p sampling with temperature 1.5 and min-p parameter 0.3 in their Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model, finding that this configuration consistently produced more diverse trajectory data while maintaining higher real-time accuracy compared to alternative sampling methods.

“Specifically, they implemented min-p sampling with temperature 1.5 and min-p parameter 0.3 in their Llama-3.1-8B-Instructmodel, finding that this configuration consistently produced more diverse trajectory data while maintaining higher real-time accuracy compared to alternative sampling methods.”

• cites Tajwar et al., 2025 sourcePartly supported

  Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

  Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Recent research in reinforcement learning has begun utilizing min-p sampling for generating high-quality and diverse training data for curious agents.

“Recent research in reinforcement learning has begun utilizing min-p sampling for generating high-quality and diverse training data for curious agents (Tajwar et al., 2025).”

• cites Tajwar et al., 2025 sourceSupported

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The Top-Nσ method builds on min-p by filtering tokens based on the standard deviation of the logit distribution.

“As of February 2025, we are aware of the Top-Nσ (Tang et al., 2024) method, which builds on min-p by filtering tokens based on the standard deviation of the logit distribution.”

• cites Tang et al., 2024 sourcePartly supported

  Section 2.3 and the algorithm in Section 3 confirm that Top-nσ filters tokens using a threshold based on the standard deviation of the logit distribution. Section 2.2.2 analyzes min-p and uses its effectiveness as an insight into the informative region, but the paper presents Top-nσ as a distinct logit-based method, not as an extension of min-p. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

  Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

May combine two claims.

Wang & Zhou (2024) found a significant correlation between the confidence or certainty level of the final answer token choice and correct scores on GSM8K CoT, and that promoting diverse lower-probability token choices encouraged generating chains of thought beneficial for reasoning, resulting in higher scores overall.

“Wang & Zhou (2024) found a significant correlation between the confidence/certainly level of the final answer token choice and correct scores on GSM8K CoT, and that promoting diverse lower-probability token choices encouraged generating chains of thought that were beneficial for reasoning, resulting in higher scores overall.”

• cites Wang & Zhou (2024) sourcePartly supported

  Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

  Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

May combine two claims.

In their Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct implementation, Tajwar et al. selected min-p sampling with temperature 1.5 and min-p parameter 0.3 after observing that this configuration consistently generated diverse training data while maintaining higher real-time accuracy compared to other sampling methods.

“In their Llama-3.1-8B-Instructmodel implementation, they selected min-p sampling with temperature 1.5 and min-p parameter 0.3 after observing that this configuration consistently generated diverse training data while maintaining higher real-time accuracy compared to other sampling methods.”

• cites Tajwar et al., 2025 sourcePartly supported

  Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

  Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

May combine two claims.

In high-confidence scenarios, min-p prioritizes the most relevant tokens, filtering out less pertinent options and maintaining factual accuracy and coherence even at high temperatures.

“In high-confidence scenarios (Case Study 2), min-p prioritizes the most relevant tokens, filtering out less pertinent options and maintaining factual accuracy and coherence even at high temperatures.”

May combine two claims.

Min-p sampling is better in both output quality and diversity according to human evaluation.

“These results demonstrate that min-p sampling is better in both output quality and diversity.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The authors could not find clear recommendations on the optimal hyperparameters for top-k.

“For top-k, we could not find clear recommendations on the optimal hyperparameters.”

May combine two claims.

Human evaluations show a preference for min-p outputs over other methods in both text quality and creativity/diversity.

“Human evaluations show a preference for min-p, in both text quality and creativity.”

• Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · boosted

  “The results indicate a clear preference for min-p, with participants rating min-p outputs as superior in quality and diversity.”

• Also stated in: § Evaluation Criteria · boosted

  “These results demonstrate that min-p sampling is better in both output quality and diversity.”

The quote only partly states this claim.

The earlier claim specifying '54,000 repositories and 1.1 million stars' was based on preliminary GitHub scans using search terms like 'min_p' which produced many false positives.

“We wish to clarify that our earlier claim specifying”

May combine two claims.

For top-k, best scores and settings varied substantially by temperature, making a fair comparison difficult because top-k is meant to be a static threshold and not dynamically adjusted at inference.

“Due to the nature of top-k, we noted that best scores and settings varied substantially by temperature, making a fair comparison difficult as, in practice, top-k is meant to be a static threshold and not dynamically adjusted at inference.”

May combine two claims.

Min-p achieves a higher win rate on AlpacaEval Creative Writing, producing high-quality creative writing without sacrificing coherence.

“Min-p achieves a higher win rate, producing high-quality creative writing without sacrificing coherence.”

May combine two claims.

Min-p sampling improves both quality and diversity of generated text across benchmarks including GPQA, GSM8K, and AlpacaEval Creative Writing, across different model families (Mistral and Llama 3) and model sizes (1B to 123B parameters), especially at higher temperatures.

“Our experiments on benchmarks including GPQA, GSM8K, and AlpacaEval Creative Writing show that min-p sampling improves both the quality and diversity of generated text across different model families (Mistral and Llama 3) and model sizes (1B to 123B parameters), especially at higher temperatures.”

• Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · plain

  “Our results show that min-p sampling outperforms top-p and other popular decoding methods such as top-k (Fan et al., 2018) and ηsampling (Hewitt et al., 2022a) by maintaining coherence while allowing for increased diversity, particularly at high-temperatures.”

• Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · boosted

  “We present comprehensive experimental results across benchmarks, model families and sizes, demonstrating that in practice min-p consistently improves quality and diversity of generated text, especially at higher temperatures, compared to sampling methods like top-p.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

Setting p_base between 0.05 to 0.1 effectively balances creativity and coherence across tasks and models.

“Setting p base between 0.05 to 0.1 effectively balances creativity and coherence across tasks and models.”

The quote only partly states this claim.

Min-p achieves a better accuracy-creativity trade-off compared to top-p on GSM8K, lying closer to the Pareto frontier.

“Figure 2 shows min-p sampling achieves a better accuracy-creativity trade-off compared to top-p sampling, consistently lying closer to the Pareto frontier and indicating more efficient performance.”

May combine two claims.

For min-p, p_base = 0.05 and 0.1 perform well on GPQA, GSM8K CoT, and human evaluation across high, low, and no temperature scaling.

“For min-p = 0.05 and 0.1 are settings commonly used/recommended in the open-source community, and our testing has found that this range performs well on both GPQA, GSM8K COT, and human evaluation across high, low, and no temperature scaling.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

During the experiments, min-p, top-p, and top-k generally took 2-5 minutes to evaluate on Mistral 7B at every temperature for both GPQA and GSM8K.

“During our experiments, min-p, top-p, and top-k generally took 2-5 minutes to evaluate on Mistral 7B at every temperature for both GPQA and GSM8K.”

May combine two claims.

Min-p configurations show greater spread/sensitivity to hyperparameters than top-p, allowing fine-grained control over output diversity and coherence.

“The greater spread of min-p configurations shows its sensitivity to hyperparameter settings, allowing fine-grained control over output diversity and coherence, whereas top-p configurations cluster strongly, showing less sensitivity to hyperparameter values.”

May combine two claims.

η and ε sampling showed exponential runtime increases with temperature and failed completely at τ > 1.5, while min-p remained computationally efficient.

“Additionally, η and ϵ sampling showed exponential runtime increases with temperature and failed completely at τ > 1.5, while min-p remained computationally efficient (Appendix A.3).”

May combine two claims.

Min-p works well across a wide range of temperatures, with higher temperatures (τ=2 or 3) enhancing diversity with much lower loss of coherence.

“Min-p works well across a wide range of temperatures, with higher temperatures (e.g., τ = 2 or τ = 3) enhancing diversity with much lower loss of coherence.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

A GitHub code search query yields over 13,000 matching code files.

“This slightly restrictive search, which assumes min-p is a variable present in a file alongside several other sampling parameters, yields over 13,000 matching code files.”

May combine two claims.

Higher values of p_base (0.5-0.7 or close to 1) can help maintain coherence and improve benchmark scores at very high temperatures, typically at the cost of diversity.

“Higher values of p base (e.g., 0.5-0.7 or even close to 1) can help maintain coherence and improve benchmark scores at very high temperatures, typically at the cost of diversity (see Table 13).”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Of 70 initial responses, 16 failed checks, resulting in 54 valid responses.

“Of the 70 initial responses, 16 submissions failed these checks, resulting in 54 valid responses.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Risk Levels correlate strongly with optimal results across temperature ranges.

“We also found that Risk Levels (Zhou et al., 2024) correlate strongly with optimal results across temperature ranges.”

• cites Zhou et al., 2024Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

A manual scan suggests that many of the matching references are related to sampling configurations, corroborating the method's broader community-level diffusion beyond the curated list.

“A manual scan suggests that many of these references are indeed related to sampling configurations, corroborating the method's broader community-level diffusion beyond the curated list above.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

On GSM8K, η and ε each took 2 hours to evaluate, equal to the average for the Llama 70B/Mistral Large run.

“On GSM8K, η and ϵ each took 2 hours to evaluate, equal to the average for our Llama 70B/Mistral Large run.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

For GPQA (Larger Models), Llama 3.1 70B's best score (41.52%) with Min P=0.1 at temperature 1.0 exceeds its greedy score (41.07%) by 0.45%.

“| Llama 3.1 70B | 41.07% | 41.52% (+0.45%) | Min P = 0.1 | 1.0 |”

May combine two claims.

Min_p consistently outperforms top_p across various metrics, with especially notable improvements in narrative flow (+0.70) and imagery (+0.62).

“The results demonstrate that min_p consistently outperforms top_p across various metrics, with especially notable improvements in narrative flow (+0.70) and imagery (+0.62).”

May combine two claims.

Leading commercial LLMs (ChatGPT and Claude) scored the standard sampling passage between 3-4/10 due to grammatical errors and narrative incoherence, while rating top-p 5-6.5/10 and min-p's more coherent excerpts around 7-8.5/10.

“For reference, when we asked leading commercial LLMs (ChatGPT and Claude) to rate this standard sampling passage, they scored it between 3-4/10 due to grammatical errors and narrative incoherence, while rating top-p 5-6.5/10 and min-p's more coherent excerpts around 7-8.5/10.5”

May combine two claims.

This advantage is maintained across temperature settings, with min_p showing particular strength at higher temperatures where coherence typically degrades.

“This advantage is Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 maintained across temperature settings, with min_p showing particular strength at higher temperatures where coherence typically degrades.”

May combine two claims.

Hugging Face applies temperature scaling after truncation sampling (rather than before), which considerably reduces the effect of truncation sampling methods, especially at higher temperatures.

“we discovered that Hugging Face applies temperature scaling after truncation sampling (rather than before), which considerably reduces the effect of truncation sampling methods, especially at higher temperatures.”

May combine two claims.

Scores on Mistral 7B increased from τ = 1.0 to τ = 1.5, but only with Temperature Only and min-p.

“scores on Mistral 7B increased from τ = 1.0 to τ = 1.5, but only with Temperature Only and min-p.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The authors' own tests do not find benefits to combining truncation sampling methods.

“While our own tests do not find benefits to combining truncation sampling methods, and there is little existing research into the matter, we acknowledge that combining truncation sampling approaches could be viable.”

May combine two claims.

On GSM8K CoT-SC, min-p achieves higher accuracy and diversity compared to top-p.

“shows that min-p (circles) achieves higher accuracy and diversity compared to top-p (triangles).”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

For GPQA (Larger Models), Llama 3.1 70B's best score (42.19%) with Min P=0.1 at temperature 0.5 exceeds its greedy score (41.07%) by 1.12%.

“| Llama 3.1 70B | 41.07% | 42.19% (+1.12%) | Min P = 0.1 | 0.5 |”

May combine two claims.

For Mistral-7B at temperature 1.0, min_p=0.1 compared to top_p=0.95 yields creativity 6.89 vs 5.33, originality 6.22 vs 4.78, narrative flow 6.67 vs 4.22, emotional impact 5.89 vs 3.89, imagery 7.00 vs 4.11.

“| Mistral-7B | p=0.1/0.95 6.89 6.22 6.67 5.89 7.00 | 5.33 4.78 4.22 3.89 4.11 |”

May combine two claims.

In human evaluation, min-p outperforms top-p in quality and diversity.

“Table 4 : Human Evaluation: Min-p outperforms top-p in quality and diversity.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

For GSM8K, Mistral 7B's best score (40.33%) with Min P=0.05 at temperature 0.3 exceeds its greedy score (39.35%) by 0.98%.

“| Mistral 7B | 39.35% | 40.33% (+0.98%) | Min P = 0.05 | 0.3 |”

May combine two claims.

Winrate (LC) results are consistent with Winrate results, confirming that the benefits of min-p sampling are robust to biases due to differences in output length.

“Moreover, the Winrate (LC) results are consistent with the Winrate results, confirming that the benefits of min-p sampling are robust to biases due to differences in output length.”

May combine two claims.

At temperature 3.0, standard sampling and top-p both produced incoherent text (scores near 1 out of 10), while min-p maintained notably higher scores.

“At temperature 3.0, standard sampling and top-p both produced incoherent text (scores near 1 out of 10), while min-p maintained notably higher”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

We implemented attention checks and incentives to ensure high-quality responses.

“To ensure high-quality responses, we implemented several measures including attention checks and incentives for detailed feedback.”

May combine two claims.

Min-p is a practical alternative to η and ε sampling's entropy-based heuristics both on quantitative benchmarks and compute efficiency.

“Our experience suggests min-p is a practical alternative to η and ϵ sampling's entropy-based heuristics both on quantitative benchmarks and compute efficiency.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Top-p values of 0.9 and 0.95 are commonly used or recommended in the open-source community and were found optimal in several independent MAUVE assessments.

“For top-p, top-p = 0.9 and top-p =0.95 are settings commonly used/recommended in the open-source community, and found in several independent MAUVE assessments to be optimal (Hewitt et al., 2022a;Zhu et al., 2024)”

• cites Hewitt et al., 2022aNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Zhu et al., 2024Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

Min-p's strengths lie in its simplicity, computational efficiency, and seamless integration into existing pipelines, as evidenced by its rapid adoption.

“Min-p's strengths lie in its simplicity, computational efficiency, and seamless integration into existing pipelines, as evidenced by its rapid adoption in many leading open-source frameworks.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: Entropy-based sampling methods often require complex parameter tuning and can be computationally expensive.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

All datasets used are publicly accessible, and we include full implementation code.

“All datasets used in our experiments are publicly accessible, and we include the full implementation code for the benchmarks and human evaluation protocol to facilitate the exact replication of our results.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

We have made demonstrable efforts to ensure reproducibility.

“We have made demonstrable efforts to ensure the reproducibility of our results.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The revised assessment approach, while potentially undercounting total adoption, provides a more conservative and verifiable measure of min-p's integration in the open-source ecosystem.

“This approach, while potentially undercounting total adoption, provides a more conservative and verifiable measure of min-p's integration in the open-source ecosystem.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The reported diversity score is a point estimate reflecting diversity within the 3 specific samples.

“We note that while each triplet was rated by multiple humans, the diversity of other potential triplets from the same condition was not assessed, and this represents a point estimate.”

May combine two claims.

Min-p sampling is a viable and superior alternative to existing sampling methods, both at standard and high-temperature settings.

“Our results demonstrate that min-p is a viable and superior alternative to existing sampling methods, both at standard and hightemperature settings, respectively, marking a major contribution to generative language modeling.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: There is a trade-off between creativity and coherence in LLM text generation.
• AssumptionRests on an assumption: Increasing temperature to enhance diversity often reduces coherence, while more conservative sampling limits creativity.
• AssumptionRests on an assumption: Higher temperatures often give incoherent outputs, limiting applicability of temperature scaling.
• AssumptionRests on an assumption: At higher temperatures, top-p can still allow low-probability tokens into the sampling pool, leading to incoherent outputs.
• AssumptionRests on an assumption: A key limitation of existing sampling methods is their performance at high temperatures.
• AssumptionRests on an assumption: As temperature increases, token probabilities become more uniform, allowing unlikely tokens to be selected, resulting in incoherent text.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The hyperparameter settings were chosen based on empirical guidelines and prior research for a fair comparison.

“These hyperparameter settings were chosen based on empirical guidelines and prior research for a fair comparison (See Appendix A.2 for extensive discussion).”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

Evidence of integration into major frameworks represents the most reliable indicator of min-p's practical availability and potential for impact.

“we believe this evidence of integration into major frameworks represents the most reliable indicator of min-p's practical availability and potential for impact.”

May combine two claims.

Min-p sampling is simple, requires minimal calculations, and integrates easily into existing LLM inference pipelines without substantial overhead.

“Min-p is simple, requiring minimal calculations.”

• Also stated in: § Robustness at High Temperatures. · plain

  “Unlike methods involving auxiliary models (Li et al., 2023a) or complex entropy-based adjustments (Hewitt et al., 2022a), min-p integrates easily into existing LLM inference pipelines without substantial overhead, offering practical advantages for both research and real-world applications compared to entropy-based methods such as ϵ and η sampling (Hewitt et al., 2022b), as we discuss in Appendix A”

• cites Li et al., 2023aNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Hewitt et al., 2022aNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Hewitt et al., 2022bNot matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: Entropy-based sampling methods often require complex parameter tuning and can be computationally expensive.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

We recruited participants through Prolific with demographic filters to ensure fluency in English and regular AI use.

“We recruited participants through the polling platform Prolific, applying demographic filters to ensure all participants were fluent in English and regular AI users who interact with large language models at least several times a week.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

This demonstrates that principles from min-p have valuable applications beyond text generation in areas like agent training and decision-making systems, where balancing exploration and coherence is crucial.

“This demonstrates that principles from min-p have valuable applications beyond text generation in areas like agent training and decision-making systems, where balancing exploration and coherence is crucial.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Flagged suspiciously quick completions (<15 minutes) for manual review, cross referenced with response quality and attention check completion.

“Flagged suspiciously quick completions (<15 minutes) for manual review, cross referenced with response quality and attention check completion”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Unsloth's documentation specifies that '-minp 0.05' helps 'counteract very rare token predictions,' particularly beneficial for their quantized 1.58-bit model, demonstrating how min-p effectively balances token selection in both high-temperature creative settings and reasoning-intensive applications.

“Their documentation specifies that”

• cites Unsloth (2025)Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

The base probability threshold p_base is a critical hyperparameter.

“Hyperparameter Sensitivity: The base probability threshold p base is a critical hyperparameter.”

May combine two claims.

Min-p sampling dynamically adjusts its threshold based on the model's confidence, focusing on likeliest tokens when confident and allowing more diverse options when uncertain.

“Min-p sampling dynamically adjusts its threshold based on the model's confidence, focusing on likeliest tokens when confident and allowing more diverse options when uncertain.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

Min-z is designed to be more information-efficient in heavy-tailed logit distributions.

“Both methods dynamically truncate low-probability tokens, but min-z is designed to be more information-efficient in heavy-tailed logit distributions.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

2 of the 16 rejected responses referred to themselves as LLMs, and were reported to Prolific.

“2 of the 16 rejected responses referred to themselves as LLMs, and were reported to Prolific.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Choosing high-certainty tokens enables more accurate final answers, while diverse token choices benefit intermediate reasoning steps.

“This mirrors our hypothesis that choosing high-certainty tokens enables more accurate final answers, while diverse token choices benefit intermediate reasoning steps.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Min-p has shown particular promise with state-of-the-art reasoning models, with major providers like Unsloth explicitly recommending min-p settings for their DeepSeek-R1 implementation.

“Advanced Reasoning Models: Min-p has shown particular promise with state-of-the-art reasoning models, with major providers like Unsloth (2025) explicitly recommending min-p settings for their DeepSeek-R1 implementation.”

• cites Unsloth (2025)Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

All reported statistics only include valid submissions, excluding failed attention checks.

“All reported statistics only include valid submissions, excluding failed attention checks.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Min-p generates diverse samples for identifying vulnerabilities in red-teaming.

“Red-Teaming: Generates diverse samples for identifying vulnerabilities (Anurin et al., 2024)”

• cites Anurin et al., 2024Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

May combine two claims.

Min-p's advantage is particularly evident under high-temperature conditions where baseline methods degrade significantly, allowing min-p to maintain relative coherence in these regimes, even if absolute quality scores are lower than those achievable in optimal low-temperature settings.

“This advantage is particularly evident under high-temperature conditions where baseline methods degrade significantly, allowing min-p to maintain relative coherence in these regimes, even if absolute quality scores are lower than those achievable in optimal low-temperature settings.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Quality control filtering applied before analysis.

“Quality control filtering applied before analysis.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

MAUVE hyperparameter sweeps are measured without temperature scaling on GPT2-XL and require pre-selection on exact hyperparameters.

“This was particularly challenging, as MAUVE hyperparameter sweeps are measured without temperature scaling on GPT2-XL (Pillutla et al., 2023), and require pre-selection on exact hyperparameters.”

• cites Pillutla et al., 2023Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Participants who failed to follow instructions in their final submission (n=16) were excluded from analysis.

“Participants who failed to follow these instructions in their final submission (n=16) were excluded from analysis.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Initial n=70, final n=54 after attention check filtering.

“Initial n=70, Final n=54 after attention check filtering”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Manual review of open-ended responses for signs of low effort/automated completion was performed.

“Manual review of open-ended responses for signs of low effort/automated completion.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

In creative writing, min-p enhances narrative generation by allowing higher temperatures without losing coherence, unlocking new capabilities for storytelling and poetry.

“Creative Writing: Enhances narrative generation by allowing higher temperatures without losing coherence, unlocking new capabilities for storytelling and poetry.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

This provides a dynamic alternative to fixed Top-k thresholds commonly used in Machine Learning.

“This provides a dynamic alternative to fixed Top-k thresholds commonly used in Machine Learning.”

May combine two claims.

The optimal configuration appears to be min_p=0.1 with the Mistral-7B model, which shows substantial gains across all quality dimensions.

“The optimal configuration appears to be min_p=0.1 with the Mistral-7B model, which shows substantial gains across all quality dimensions.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Participants who read the survey examples and questions were capable of completing the attention checks without issues.

“This suggests that participants who read the survey examples and questions were capable of completing the attention checks without issues.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

This approach enabled their agent to explore more effectively while maintaining solution coherence, demonstrating min-p's potential for improving reinforcement learning for agent exploration.

“This approach enabled their agent to explore more effectively while maintaining solution coherence, demonstrating min-p's potential for improving reinforcement learning for agent exploration.”