PreprintCited by 16Topic ModelingInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

CompAct: Compressing Retrieved Documents Actively for Question Answering

Open access
Yoon, Chanwoong, Lee, Taewhoo, Hwang, Hyeon, Jeong, Minbyul, Kang, Jaewoo·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation supports language models to strengthen their factual groundings by providing external contexts. However, language models often face challenges when given extensive information, diminishing their effectiveness in solving questions. Context compression tackles this issue by filtering out irrelevant information, but current methods still struggle in realistic scenarios where crucial information cannot be captured with a single-step approach. To overcome this limitation, we introduce CompAct, a novel framework that employs an active strategy to condense extensive documents without losing key information. Our experiments demonstrate that CompAct brings significant improvements in both performance and compression rate on multi-hop question-answering benchmarks. CompAct flexibly operates as a cost-efficient plug-in module with various off-the-shelf retrievers or readers, achieving exceptionally high compression rates (47x).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2407.09014

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ongoing conversations with context length exceeding that in the training data become out-of-distribution for the model, and the model struggles to manage and reason over such unfamiliar long-horizon inputs.

    “Ongoing conversations with context length exceeding that in the training data become out-of-distribution for the model. The model struggles to manage and reason over such unfamiliar long-horizon inputs [63].”

    From MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Introduction (section 1; page unavailable) says models struggle to find key information in extensive contexts and to integrate information across documents. It does not address ongoing conversations or establish that inputs longer than those in training become out-of-distribution; those qualifiers are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • External memory modules (summarizers or retrievers) are typically trained separately and cannot be optimized end-to-end with the agent's policy, introducing additional engineering overhead.

    “Some other approaches introduce external memory modules ( e.g., summarizers or retrievers) [63, 29, 13, 57], but these are typically trained separately and cannot be optimized end-to-end with the agent's policy. This also introduces additional engineering overhead, as engineers must manage and integrate two separate models.”

    From MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Training & Inference section says COMPACT’s compressor is fine-tuned, and Section 5.1 describes it as a plug-in used with replaceable retrievers and readers. That supports citing COMPACT as an example of an external module, but the paper does not establish that such modules typically cannot be optimized end-to-end with an agent’s policy or that integrating them creates additional engineering overhead. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Tao Ge, Hu Jing, Lei Wang, Xun Wang, Si-Qing Chen, and Furu Wei. 2024. In-context autoencoder for con- text compression in a large language model. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations. Google. 2024. gemini-1.5-pro.
  2. Xanh Ho, Anh-Khoa Duong Nguyen, Saku Sugawara, and Akiko Aizawa. 2020a. Constructing a multi-hop QA dataset for comprehensive evaluation of reason- ing steps. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain (Online). International Committee on Compu- tational Linguistics.
  3. Xanh Ho, Anh-Khoa Duong Nguyen, Saku Sugawara, and Akiko Aizawa. 2020b. Constructing a multi-hop qa dataset for comprehensive evaluation of reason- ing steps. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
  4. Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Sebas- tian Riedel, Piotr Bojanowski, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. 2022. Unsupervised dense informa- tion retrieval with contrastive learning. Transactions on Machine Learning Research.
  5. Gautier Izacard, Patrick Lewis, Maria Lomeli, Lucas Hosseini, Fabio Petroni, Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi- Yu, Armand Joulin, Sebastian Riedel, and Edouard Grave. 2023. Atlas: Few-shot learning with retrieval augmented language models. Journal of Machine Learning Research.
  6. Urvashi Khandelwal, Omer Levy, Dan Jurafsky, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Mike Lewis. 2019. Generalization through memorization: Nearest neighbor language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  7. Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), San Diega, CA, USA.
  8. Yucheng Li, Bo Dong, Frank Guerin, and Chenghua Lin. 2023. Compressing context to enhance inference ef- ficiency of large language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu- ral Language Processing, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  9. Jesse Mu, Xiang Lisa Li, and Noah Goodman. 2024. Learning to compress prompts with gist tokens. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Red Hook, NY, USA.
  10. Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al. 2019. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems.
  11. Fangyuan Xu, Weijia Shi, and Eunsol Choi. 2024. RE- COMP: Improving retrieval-augmented LMs with context compression and selective augmentation. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  12. AI, Andrew Young, Bin Chen, Chao Li, Chen Huang, Guodong Zhang, Guang Zhang, Haotian Li, Jiaming Zhu, Jin Chen, Jiawei Chang, Kaifeng Yu, Pengfei Liu, Qi Liu, Shang Yue, Shuai Yang, Shuo Yang, Tao Yu, Wei Xie, Wei Huang, Xiaoyi Hu, Xudong Ren, Xinting Niu, Ping Nie, Yihan Xu, Yufei Liu, Yida Wang, Yuxin Cai, Zheng Gu, Zhenghao Liu, and Zhilin Dai. 2024. Yi: Open foundation models by 01.AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14219. · arXiv
  13. Kuang-Huei Lee, Xinyun Chen, Hiroki Furuta, John Canny, and Ian Fischer. 2024. A human-inspired reading agent with gist memory of very long con- texts. In Proceedings of the Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoon, C., Lee, T., Hwang, H., Jeong, M., & Kang, J.
Affiliations
Korea University (KR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
21424-21439
OpenAlex
W4404781906
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6
FWCI
4.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (IITP‐2024‐2020‐0‐01819, 2020-0-01819)
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (IITP-2024-2020-0-01819)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
document compression, retrieval-augmented generation, question answering, multi-hop question answering, information filtering, language models, retrieval-augmented question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review