CellAgent: An LLM-driven Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Single-cell Data Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis is crucial for biological research, as it enables the precise characterization of cellular heterogeneity. However, manual manipulation of various tools to achieve desired outcomes can be labor-intensive for researchers. To address this, we introduce CellAgent (http://cell.agent4science.cn/), an LLM-driven multi-agent framework, specifically designed for the automatic processing and execution of scRNA-seq data analysis tasks, providing high-quality results with no human intervention. Firstly, to adapt general LLMs to the biological field, CellAgent constructs LLM-driven biological expert roles - planner, executor, and evaluator - each with specific responsibilities. Then, CellAgent introduces a hierarchical decision-making mechanism to coordinate these biological experts, effectively driving the planning and step-by-step execution of complex data analysis tasks. Furthermore, we propose a self-iterative optimization mechanism, enabling CellAgent to autonomously evaluate and optimize solutions, thereby guaranteeing output quality. We evaluate CellAgent on a comprehensive benchmark dataset encompassing dozens of tissues and hundreds of distinct cell types. Evaluation results consistently show that CellAgent effectively identifies the most suitable tools and hyperparameters for single-cell analysis tasks, achieving optimal performance. This automated framework dramatically reduces the workload for science data analyses, bringing us into the "Agent for Science" era.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CellAgent achieved a 92% task completion rate and outperformed other scRNA-seq tools in accuracy and reliability.
“CellAgent reduces human intervention by incorporating a selfiterative optimization mechanism, achieving a 92% task completion rate and outperforming other scRNA-seq tools in accuracy and reliability.”
From Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as Xiao et al., 2024
Constructing a multi-agent system typically requires manual efforts in defining roles, specifying task decomposition strategies, designing agent interactions, and configuring execution workflows.
“Despite these promising developments, constructing a multi-agent system typically requires manual efforts in defining the roles of agents, specifying task decomposition strategies, designing agent interactions, and configuring execution workflows (Tang et al., 2024;Xiao et al., 2024).”
From EvoAgentX: An Automated Framework for Evolving Agentic Workflows (2025) · cites this paper as Xiao et al., 2024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomni: A general-purpose biomedical ai agent
Huang, K., Zhang, S., Wang, H., Qu, Y., Lu, Y., Roohani, Y., Li, R., Qiu, L., Li, G., Zhang, J., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.30.656746 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
Gridach, M., Nanavati, J., Abidine, K. Z. E., Mendes, L., & Mack, C. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.08979 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…systems are widely explored in domains including scientific discovery Schmidgall et al. (2025); Baek et al. (2024); Ghafarollahi & Buehler (2024b); Swanson et al. (2024); Xiao et al. (2024), software development Qian et al. (2024); White (2024) and healthcare Tang et al. (2024); Kim et al. (2024).”
EvoAgentX: An Automated Framework for Evolving Agentic Workflows
Wang, Y., Liu, S., Fang, J., & Meng, Z. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-demos.47 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xiao, Y., Liu, J., Zheng, Y., Xie, X., Hao, J., Li, M., Wang, R., Ni, F., Li, Y., Luo, J., Jiao, S., & Peng, J.
- Affiliations
- Tianjin University (CN)
- Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2407.09811
- OpenAlex
- W4400702967
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- single-cell RNA sequencing, automated data analysis, multi-agent systems, large language models, LLM agents, hierarchical decision-making, tool selection, hyperparameter optimization, cellular heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review