PreprintCited by 8Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsScientific Computing and Data ManagementCell Image Analysis Techniques

CellAgent: An LLM-driven Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Single-cell Data Analysis

Open access
Xiao, Yihang, Liu, Jinyi, Zheng, Yan, Xie, Xiaohan, Hao, Jianye, Li, Mingzhi, Wang, Ruitao, Ni, Fei +4 more·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis is crucial for biological research, as it enables the precise characterization of cellular heterogeneity. However, manual manipulation of various tools to achieve desired outcomes can be labor-intensive for researchers. To address this, we introduce CellAgent (http://cell.agent4science.cn/), an LLM-driven multi-agent framework, specifically designed for the automatic processing and execution of scRNA-seq data analysis tasks, providing high-quality results with no human intervention. Firstly, to adapt general LLMs to the biological field, CellAgent constructs LLM-driven biological expert roles - planner, executor, and evaluator - each with specific responsibilities. Then, CellAgent introduces a hierarchical decision-making mechanism to coordinate these biological experts, effectively driving the planning and step-by-step execution of complex data analysis tasks. Furthermore, we propose a self-iterative optimization mechanism, enabling CellAgent to autonomously evaluate and optimize solutions, thereby guaranteeing output quality. We evaluate CellAgent on a comprehensive benchmark dataset encompassing dozens of tissues and hundreds of distinct cell types. Evaluation results consistently show that CellAgent effectively identifies the most suitable tools and hyperparameters for single-cell analysis tasks, achieving optimal performance. This automated framework dramatically reduces the workload for science data analyses, bringing us into the "Agent for Science" era.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2407.09811

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CellAgent achieved a 92% task completion rate and outperformed other scRNA-seq tools in accuracy and reliability.

    “CellAgent reduces human intervention by incorporating a selfiterative optimization mechanism, achieving a 92% task completion rate and outperforming other scRNA-seq tools in accuracy and reliability.”
  • Constructing a multi-agent system typically requires manual efforts in defining roles, specifying task decomposition strategies, designing agent interactions, and configuring execution workflows.

    “Despite these promising developments, constructing a multi-agent system typically requires manual efforts in defining the roles of agents, specifying task decomposition strategies, designing agent interactions, and configuring execution workflows (Tang et al., 2024;Xiao et al., 2024).”

    From EvoAgentX: An Automated Framework for Evolving Agentic Workflows (2025) · cites this paper as Xiao et al., 2024

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, Y., Liu, J., Zheng, Y., Xie, X., Hao, J., Li, M., Wang, R., Ni, F., Li, Y., Luo, J., Jiao, S., & Peng, J.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400702967
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, automated data analysis, multi-agent systems, large language models, LLM agents, hierarchical decision-making, tool selection, hyperparameter optimization, cellular heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review