The DOI matches its DataCite record.
ASVspoof 5: Crowdsourced Speech Data, Deepfakes, and Adversarial Attacks at Scale
Open accessAbstract
ASVspoof 5 is the fifth edition in a series of challenges that promote the study of speech spoofing and deepfake attacks, and the design of detection solutions. Compared to previous challenges, the ASVspoof 5 database is built from crowdsourced data collected from a vastly greater number of speakers in diverse acoustic conditions. Attacks, also crowdsourced, are generated and tested using surrogate detection models, while adversarial attacks are incorporated for the first time. New metrics support the evaluation of spoofing-robust automatic speaker verification (SASV) as well as stand-alone detection solutions, i.e., countermeasures without ASV. We describe the two challenge tracks, the new database, the evaluation metrics, baselines, and the evaluation platform, and present a summary of the results. Attacks significantly compromise the baseline systems, while submissions bring substantial improvements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For the creation of the evaluation set, 16 attacks and 11 codecs were used [24].”
From Robust audio deepfake detection: exploring front-/back-end combinations and data augmentation strategies for the ASVspoof5 Challenge (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“A20 and A30 are adversarial attacks [24].”
From Robust audio deepfake detection: exploring front-/back-end combinations and data augmentation strategies for the ASVspoof5 Challenge (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“However, the limitation within the ASV5 challenge's open track discarded the majority of the top performing readily available pretrained models.”
From WavLM model ensemble for audio deepfake detection (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Speech Deepfake Detection
Li, M., Ahmadiadli, Y., & Zhang, X.-P. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3714458 · Cited by 101
Audio Deepfake Detection: What Has Been Achieved and What Lies Ahead
Zhang, B., Cui, H., Nguyen, V., & Whitty, M. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25071989 · Cited by 72
The Codecfake Dataset and Countermeasures for the Universally Detection of Deepfake Audio
Xie, Y., Lu, Y., Fu, R., Wen, Z., Wang, Z., Tao, J., Qi, X., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Cheng, H., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslpro.2025.3525966 · Cited by 67
Self-citationWang, X., Delgado, H., Tak, H., Jung, J.-W., Shim, H.-J., Todisco, M., Kukanov, I., Liu, X., Sahidullah, M., Kinnunen, T., et al. (2026) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2025.101825 · Cited by 30
Self-citationSpoofCeleb: Speech Deepfake Detection and SASV in the Wild
Jung, J.-W., Wu, Y., Wang, X., Kim, J.-H., Maiti, S., Matsunaga, Y., Shim, H.-J., Tian, J., Evans, N., Chung, J. S., et al. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/ojsp.2025.3529377 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Delgado, H., Tak, H., Jung, J.-W., Shim, H.-J., Todisco, M., Kukanov, I., Liu, X., Sahidullah, M., Kinnunen, T., Evans, N., Lee, K. A., & Yamagishi, J.
- Affiliations
- EURECOM (FR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 1-8
- arXiv
- 2408.08739
- OpenAlex
- W4403955716
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 48
- FWCI
- 29.51
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Locations
- Automatic Speaker Verification Spoofing Countermeasures Workshop (ASVspoof) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- HAL (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Itä-Suomen Yliopisto
- Helsingin Yliopisto
- Carnegie Mellon University
- University of Rochester
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-22-CE39-0009, ANR-22-PECY-0011)
- Academia Sinica
- Seoul National University
- Renmin University of China
- Tianjin University
- National Taiwan University
- University of Science and Technology of China
- Universität Stuttgart
- University at Buffalo
- Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- anti-spoofing, speaker verification, deepfakes, adversarial attacks, spoofing attacks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review