MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark
Open accessAbstract
This paper introduces MMMU-Pro, a robust version of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning (MMMU) benchmark. MMMU-Pro rigorously assesses multimodal models' true understanding and reasoning capabilities through a three-step process based on MMMU: (1) filtering out questions answerable by text-only models, (2) augmenting candidate options, and (3) introducing a vision-only input setting where questions are embedded within images. This setting challenges AI to truly "see" and "read" simultaneously, testing a fundamental human cognitive skill of seamlessly integrating visual and textual information. Results show that model performance is substantially lower on MMMU-Pro than on MMMU, ranging from 16.8% to 26.9% across models. We explore the impact of OCR prompts and Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning, finding that OCR prompts have minimal effect while CoT generally improves performance. MMMU-Pro provides a more rigorous evaluation tool, closely mimicking real-world scenarios and offering valuable directions for future research in multimodal AI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The open-source model ecosystem has progressed slowly on scaling pre-trained foundation size, with many recent models remaining within or slightly above the 1T-class parameter regime.
“However, while the open-source model ecosystem has advanced rapidly on the second axis, it has progressed slowly on the first: many recent models remain within or slightly above the 1T-class parameter regime [145,29,135,120].”
From Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as [145]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bai, S., Cai, Y., Chen, R., Chen, K., Chen, X., Cheng, Z., Deng, L., Ding, W., Gao, C., Ge, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.21631 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“…spanning a diverse range of domains—from mathematics and STEM to visual reasoning and puzzle-solving tasks: MMMU (Yue et al., 2024a), MMMU-Pro (Yue et al., 2024b), MathVision (Wang et al., 2024b), MathVision-Wild photo , MathVista (Lu et al., 2023), We-Math (Qiao et al., 2024), MathVerse…”
InfluentialSelf-citationKimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence
Kimi Team, Bai, T., Bai, Y., Bao, Y., Cai, S. H., Cao, Y., Chai, Z., Charles, Y., Che, H. S., Chen, C., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.02276 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationKimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence
Kimi Team, Bai, T., Bai, Y., Bao, Y., C., M., Cai, J., Cai, X., Cao, P., Cao, Y., Chai, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.24653
PerceptionBench: Evaluating Atomic Visual Perception in Multimodal Large Language Models
Lin, Z., Xie, Y., Qu, B., Wang, H., Li, J., Wu, H., Dong, Y., Yang, Z., Zhu, J., Lu, H., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.24957
“…Hudson et al. 2019; Y. Zhu et al. 2016) test scene understanding through question answering, while recent holistic benchmarks (Yue, Ni, et al. 2024; Yuan Liu et al. 2024; Lin Chen et al. 2024; Yue, Zheng, et al. 2025) extend this paradigm to college-level reasoning and knowledge-intensive problems.”
Self-citationMake Each Token Count: Towards Improving Long-Context Performance with KV Cache Eviction
Bui, N., Nguyen, H. T., Cohan, A., & Ying, R. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.09649
“We consider three image-based benchmarks, including MMStar [Chen et al., 2024b], MathVision mini [Wang et al., 2024], and MMMUPro vision [Yue et al., 2025], and three video-based benchmarks, such as VideoMME [Fu et al., 2025b], VideoMathQA mcq [Rasheed et al., 2025], and VideoMMMU [Hu et al., 2025]…”
- Authors
- Yue, X., Zheng, T., Ni, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, K., Tong, S., Sun, Y., Yu, B., Zhang, G., Sun, H., Su, Y., Chen, W., & Neubig, G.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2409.02813
- OpenAlex
- W4403589924
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- multimodal reasoning, chain-of-thought reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
