The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Evidence That Conversational Artificial Intelligence Can Steer Consumer Behavior Without Detection
Open accessAbstract
Conversational AI models are becoming increasingly popular and are about to replace traditional search engines for information retrieval and product discovery. This raises concerns about monetization strategies and the potential for subtle consumer manipulation. Companies may have financial incentives to steer users toward search results or products in a conversation in ways that are unnoticeable to consumers. Using a behavioral experiment, we show that conversational AI models can indeed significantly shift consumer preferences. We discuss implications and ask whether regulators are sufficiently prepared to combat potential consumer deception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI systems that can reliably masquerade as people can be used by criminals for fraud, by governments for foreign influence, and by commercial entities to create manipulative experiences for users.
“AI systems that can reliably masquerade as people can be used by criminals for fraud [1,14,59], by governments for foreign influence [26,35], and by commercial entities to create engaging but ultimately manipulative experiences for users [7,57].”
From People cannot distinguish GPT-4 from a human in a Turing test (2025) · cites this paper as [57]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Conversational Persuasiveness of Large Language Models: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Salvi, F., Ribeiro, M. H., Gallotti, R., & West, R. (2024) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4429707/v1 · Cited by 285
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Nan Chen and Hsin-Tien Tsai. Steering via algorithmic recommendations. RAND Journal of Economics, Forthcoming, 2023.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
People cannot distinguish GPT-4 from a human in a Turing test
Jones, C. R., Rathi, I., Taylor, S., & Bergen, B. K. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732108 · Cited by 76
Jones, C. R., & Bergen, B. K. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.17128 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Werner, T., Soraperra, I., Calvano, E., Parkes, D. C., & Rahwan, I.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- arXiv
- 2409.12143
- OpenAlex
- W4403746738
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- conversational AI, consumer manipulation, consumer behavior, product discovery, consumer deception, AI regulation, behavioral experiments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
