The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancement of quantum annealing via n-local catalysts
Open accessAbstract
The potential quantum speedup in solving optimization problems via adiabatic quantum annealing is often hindered by the closing of the energy gap during the anneal, especially when this gap scales exponentially with system size. In this work, we alleviate this bottleneck by demonstrating that for the NP-complete Maximum Weighted Independent Set (MWIS) problem, an informed choice of $n-$local catalysts (operators involving $n$ qubits) can re-open the gap during the annealing process. By analyzing first-order phase transitions in toy instances of the MWIS problem, we first identify direct-tunneling catalysts that effectively eliminate the transition and provide an analytical discussion on when the sign of the catalyst influences its impact. We then reveal that $n-$local catalysts exponentially improve gap scaling and in certain scenarios are as effective as direct tunnel coupling between two minima. Utilizing this understanding, we show that they also increase the efficiency of ground state preparation via adiabatic quantum annealing in random graphs and analytically demonstrate the necessity of their placement across unfrustrated loops in the graph for effective performance in MWIS problems. Additionally, using a circuit implementation of the $n$-local catalyst (requiring $2n$ nearest-neighbour gates), we demonstrate that both the circuit depth and the total number of gates required to solve the problem are reduced by several orders of magnitude when compared to the discrete-time version of traditional quantum annealing using local drivers. Our analysis suggests that non-local quantum fluctuations entangling multiple qubits as a catalyst are key to achieving the desired quantum advantage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Next-Generation Topology of D-Wave Quantum Processors
Boothby, K., Bunyk, P., Raymond, J., & Roy, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.00133 · Cited by 125 · cited 1×
“[ 54].”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [62][L. A. Nutricati, R. Ghosh, N. Feinstein, S. Bose, and P. A. Warburton, Enhancing the energy gap of random graph problems via xx-catalysts in quantum annealing (2024), arXiv:2409.16350 [quant-ph].](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16350) · arXiv
- [66]B. Altshuler, H. Krovi, and J. Roland, Anderson localization makes adiabatic quantum optimization fail, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 , 12446 (2010), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1002116107. https://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1002116107 · DOI
- [69]T. Hattori and S. Tanaka, Controlled diagonal catalyst improves the efficiency of quantum annealing, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15244 (2025). · arXiv
- [71]T. J¨ org, F. Krzakala, J. Kurchan, A. C. Maggs, and J. Pujos, Energy gaps in quantum first-order mean-field-like transitions: The problems that quantum annealing cannot solve, Europhysics Letters 89 , 40004 (2010).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Müller, T., Singh, A., Wilhelm, F. K., & Bode, T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.19388 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghosh, R., Nutricati, L. A., Feinstein, N., Warburton, P. A., & Bose, S.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- London Centre for Nanotechnology (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2643-1564 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2409.13029
- OpenAlex
- W7128450746
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/Y004590/1 MACON-QC, EP/Y004590/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum annealing, maximum weight independent set, adiabatic quantum computation, NP-complete optimization, direct tunneling, first-order phase transition, random graphs, ground state preparation, circuit depth reduction, quantum advantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review