PreprintCited by 311Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesQuantum Information and Cryptography

Next-Generation Topology of D-Wave Quantum Processors

Open access
Boothby, Kelly, Bunyk, Paul, Raymond, Jack, Roy, Aidan·2020·arXiv

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the topology of D-Wave's next-generation quantum processors. It provides examples of minor embeddings and discusses performance of embedding algorithms for the new topology compared to the existing Chimera topology. It also presents some initial performance results for simple, standard Ising model classes of problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2003.00133

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both Ref.48 and Ref.57, NQS approaches are only used close to the critical point.

    “In both Ref.48 and Ref. 57, NQS approaches are only used close to the critical point.”

    From Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    Section 7.1 (p. 16) reports critical values for ferromagnets and spin glasses, but does not describe NQS approaches. Searches for “NQS,” “neural quantum states,” and their use near a critical point found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Since e^{iτH} is not a local operator that we can easily evaluate on our variational wave function, in practice we have to approximate the full unitary propagator.

    “Since e iτ H is not a local operator that we can easily evaluate on our variational wave function, in practice we have to approximate the full unitary propagator, which can be done in several ways 57,137,138 .”

    From Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The cited paper’s Section 7 (pp. 14, 18–20) discusses Ising-model benchmarks and optimization heuristics, not evaluating a unitary operator on a variational wave function. Searches for the full unitary propagator and its approximation found no passage addressing the claim, including the cited suggestion that it can be approximated in several ways. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6][6] Hans L. Bodlaender and Arie M.C.A. Koster. Treewidth computations I. Upper bounds. Information and Computation , 208(3):259275, 3 2010. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boothby, K., Bunyk, P., Raymond, J., & Roy, A.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006807815
Cited by
125
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum annealing, graph topology, minor embedding, embedding algorithms, Ising model, quantum annealing hardware

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review