PreprintCited by 2Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic ModelingAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Why context matters in VQA and Reasoning: Semantic interventions for VLM input modalities

Open access
Amara, Kenza, Klein, Lukas, Lüth, Carsten, Jäger, Paul, Strobelt, Hendrik, El-Assady, Mennatallah·2024·arXiv

Abstract

The various limitations of Generative AI, such as hallucinations and model failures, have made it crucial to understand the role of different modalities in Visual Language Model (VLM) predictions. Our work investigates how the integration of information from image and text modalities influences the performance and behavior of VLMs in visual question answering (VQA) and reasoning tasks. We measure this effect through answer accuracy, reasoning quality, model uncertainty, and modality relevance. We study the interplay between text and image modalities in different configurations where visual content is essential for solving the VQA task. Our contributions include (1) the Semantic Interventions (SI)-VQA dataset, (2) a benchmark study of various VLM architectures under different modality configurations, and (3) the Interactive Semantic Interventions (ISI) tool. The SI-VQA dataset serves as the foundation for the benchmark, while the ISI tool provides an interface to test and apply semantic interventions in image and text inputs, enabling more fine-grained analysis. Our results show that complementary information between modalities improves answer and reasoning quality, while contradictory information harms model performance and confidence. Image text annotations have minimal impact on accuracy and uncertainty, slightly increasing image relevance. Attention analysis confirms the dominant role of image inputs over text in VQA tasks. In this study, we evaluate state-of-the-art VLMs that allow us to extract attention coefficients for each modality. A key finding is PaliGemma's harmful overconfidence, which poses a higher risk of silent failures compared to the LLaVA models. This work sets the foundation for rigorous analysis of modality integration, supported by datasets specifically designed for this purpose.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2410.01690

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A primary obstacle in MLLM development is modality bias, where models favor textual inputs, generating plausible but multimodally ungrounded responses by relying on learned linguistic patterns rather than integrated visual or auditory information.

    “A primary obstacle in MLLM development is modality bias, where models favor textual inputs, generating plausible but multimodally ungrounded responses by relying on learned linguistic patterns rather than integrated visual or auditory information [1368, 24, 319, 1335].”

    From A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Amara, K., Klein, L., Lüth, C., Jäger, P., Strobelt, H., & El-Assady, M.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403852033
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
vision-language models, visual question answering, visual reasoning, modality integration, hallucinations, model uncertainty, attention analysis, multimodal input, PaliGemma, LLaVA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review