ARB-LLM: Alternating Refined Binarizations for Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly pushed forward advancements in natural language processing, yet their high memory and computational demands hinder practical deployment. Binarization, as an effective compression technique, can shrink model weights to just 1 bit, significantly reducing the high demands on computation and memory. However, current binarization methods struggle to narrow the distribution gap between binarized and full-precision weights, while also overlooking the column deviation in LLM weight distribution. To tackle these issues, we propose ARB-LLM, a novel 1-bit post-training quantization (PTQ) technique tailored for LLMs. To narrow the distribution shift between binarized and full-precision weights, we first design an alternating refined binarization (ARB) algorithm to progressively update the binarization parameters, which significantly reduces the quantization error. Moreover, considering the pivot role of calibration data and the column deviation in LLM weights, we further extend ARB to ARB-X and ARB-RC. In addition, we refine the weight partition strategy with column-group bitmap (CGB), which further enhance performance. Equipping ARB-X and ARB-RC with CGB, we obtain ARB-LLM$_\text{X}$ and ARB-LLM$_\text{RC}$ respectively, which significantly outperform state-of-the-art (SOTA) binarization methods for LLMs. As a binary PTQ method, our ARB-LLM$_\text{RC}$ is the first to surpass FP16 models of the same size. The code and models will be available at https://github.com/ZHITENGLI/ARB-LLM.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comprehensive scaling over multiple dimensions (e.g., row and column) is crucial for mitigating information loss and stabilizing performance in 1-bit methods.
“Recent high-performing 1-bit methods [13, 24, 25] demonstrate that comprehensive scaling over multiple dimensions ( e . g ., row and column) is crucial for mitigating this loss and stabilizing performance [25].”
From LittleBit: Ultra Low-Bit Quantization via Latent Factorization (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
Section 3.3 (page unavailable) says row-wise scaling alone can miss column-wise variation, and adding column-wise scaling can improve binarization. But it also says adding column-wise scaling without alternating parameter updates fails to improve performance and can increase quantization error. The claim omits that condition and attributes performance stabilization to multi-dimensional scaling alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Tim Dettmers, Ruslan Svirschevski, Vage Egiazarian, Denis Kuznedelev, Elias Frantar, Saleh Ashk- boos, Alexander Borzunov, Torsten Hoefler, and Dan Alistarh. Spqr: A sparse-quantized represen- tation for near-lossless llm weight compression. In ICLR, 2024b.
- Elias Frantar and Dan Alistarh. Sparsegpt: Massive language models can be accurately pruned in one-shot. In ICML, 2023.
- Elias Frantar, Saleh Ashkboos, Torsten Hoefler, and Dan Alistarh. Gptq: Accurate post-training quantization for generative pre-trained transformers. In ICLR, 2023.
- Yuxian Gu, Li Dong, Furu Wei, and Minlie Huang. Knowledge distillation of large language models. In ICLR, 2024.
- Wei Huang, Yangdong Liu, Haotong Qin, Ying Li, Shiming Zhang, Xianglong Liu, Michele Magno, and Xiaojuan Qi. Billm: Pushing the limit of post-training quantization for llms. In ICML, 2024.
- Yuhang Li, Ruihao Gong, Xu Tan, Yang Yang, Peng Hu, Qi Zhang, Fengwei Yu, Wei Wang, and Shi Gu. Brecq: Pushing the limit of post-training quantization by block reconstruction. In ICLR, 2021.
- Stephen Merity, Caiming Xiong, James Bradbury, and Richard Socher. Pointer sentinel mixture models. In ICLR, 2017.
- A Paszke, S Gross, F Massa, A Lerer, JP Bradbury, G Chanan, T Killeen, Z Lin, N Gimelshein, L Antiga, et al. An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In NeurIPS, 2019a.
- Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In NeurIPS, 2019b.
- Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. JMLR, 2020.
- Mingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, and J Zico Kolter. A simple and effective pruning approach for large language models. In ICLR, 2024.
- A Vaswani. Attention is all you need. In NeurIPS, 2017.
- Guangxuan Xiao, Ji Lin, Mickael Seznec, Hao Wu, Julien Demouth, and Song Han. Smoothquant: Accurate and efficient post-training quantization for large language models. In ICML, 2023.
- Chen Xu, Jianqiang Yao, Zhouchen Lin, Wenwu Ou, Yuanbin Cao, Zhirong Wang, and Hongbin Zha. Alternating multi-bit quantization for recurrent neural networks. In ICLR, 2018.
- Yuzhuang Xu, Xu Han, Zonghan Yang, Shuo Wang, Qingfu Zhu, Zhiyuan Liu, Weidong Liu, and Wanxiang Che. Onebit: Towards extremely low-bit large language models. In NeurIPS, 2024.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Addressing Activation Outliers in LLMs: A Systematic Review of Post-Training Quantization Techniques
Czakó, P., Kertész, G., & Szénási, S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3568702 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
LittleBit: Ultra Low-Bit Quantization via Latent Factorization
Lee, B., Kim, D., You, Y., & Kim, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.13771
“Recent high-performing 1-bit methods [13, 24, 25] demonstrate that sophisticated scaling over multiple dimensions ( e . g ., row and column), is crucial for mitigating this loss and stabilizing performance [25].”
- Authors
- Li, Z., Yan, X., Zhang, T., Qin, H., Xie, D., Tian, J., shi, Z., Kong, L., Zhang, Y., & Yang, X.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2410.03129
- OpenAlex
- W4403362824
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
- Keywords
- large language model compression, post-training quantization, quantization error reduction, calibration data, memory and computational efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review