Learning to Route LLMs with Confidence Tokens
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on several tasks and are increasingly deployed in real-world applications. However, especially in high-stakes settings, it becomes vital to know when the output of an LLM may be unreliable. Depending on whether an answer is trustworthy, a system can then choose to route the question to another expert, or otherwise fall back on a safe default behavior. In this work, we study the extent to which LLMs can reliably indicate confidence in their answers, and how this notion of confidence can translate into downstream accuracy gains. We propose Self-Reflection with Error-based Feedback (Self-REF), a lightweight training strategy to teach LLMs to express confidence in whether their answers are correct in a reliable manner. Self-REF introduces confidence tokens into the LLM, from which a confidence score can be extracted. Compared to conventional approaches such as verbalizing confidence and examining token probabilities, we demonstrate empirically that confidence tokens show significant improvements in downstream routing and rejection learning tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-Ref decreases the latency of LLM inference by ensuring only uncertain or incorrect outputs trigger routing to more capable LLMs.
“This ensures that only uncertain or incorrect outputs trigger routing to more capable LLMs, which decreases the latency of LLM inference.”
From Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems
Roy, S., & Roth, D. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.01413 · Cited by 275 · cited 1×
“• GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021): GSM8K is a dataset containing graduate school math questions, where each question is collected from the Math World Problem Repository (Roy & Roth, 2015).”
Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability
BRIER, G. W. (1950) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078%3c0001:vofeit%3e2.0.co;2 · cited 1×
“Following the settings from Tian et al. (2023); Błasiok et al. (2023), three calibration metrics are used to assess the calibration: (1) expected calibration error, ECE (Guo et al., 2017); (2) Brier Score, BS (Brier, 1950); and (3) the cross-entropy score, CE.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
Sui, Y., Chuang, Y.-N., Wang, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Yuan, J., Liu, H., Wen, A., Zhong, S., Zou, N., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Prompt-Guided e.g. Token-Budget [34]; Chain of Draft [99]; Token Complexity [43]; Concise Chain-of-Thought (CCoT) [69]; MARP [8]; Routing by e.g. Claude 3.7 Sonnet [2]; SoT [4]; Self-REF [17]; Confident [14]; RouteLLM [64];”
InfluentialSelf-citationA Unified Approach to Routing and Cascading for LLMs
Dekoninck, J., Baader, M., & Vechev, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.10347
“One of the most common applications of routing is model selection for natural language input queries with a known answer (Chuang et al., 2024; Ding et al., 2024; Hari & Thomson, 2023; Liu et al., 2024; Jang et al., 2023; Nguyen et al., 2024; Sakota et al., 2024; Shnitzer et al., 2023).”
- Authors
- Chuang, Y.-N., Sarma, P. K., Gopalan, P., Boccio, J., Bolouki, S., Hu, X., & Zhou, H.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- Apple (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2410.13284
- OpenAlex
- W4403579452
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- large language models, confidence estimation, answer reliability, question routing, self-reflection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review