Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a novel approach to automatically solving arithmetic word problems. This is the first algorithmic approach that can handle arithmetic problems with multiple steps and operations, without depending on additional annotations or predefined templates. We develop a theory for expression trees that can be used to represent and evaluate the target arithmetic expressions; we use it to uniquely decompose the target arithmetic problem to multiple classification problems; we then compose an expression tree, combining these with world knowledge through a constrained inference framework. Our classifiers gain from the use of {\em quantity schemas} that supports better extraction of features. Experimental results show that our method outperforms existing systems, achieving state of the art performance on benchmark datasets of arithmetic word problems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Optimized prompts found for GSM8K also outperform baseline prompts with different scorer LLMs on Multi-Arith and AQuA.
“Table 6 shows that our optimized prompts also outperform baseline prompts with different scorer LLMs on these two benchmarks.”
From Large Language Models as Optimizers (2023) · cites this paper as Roy & Roth, 2016
Section 5 (Experimental Results) evaluates arithmetic-word-problem classifiers and a full system on AI2, IL, and CC; its tables do not report prompt optimization. Searches for GSM8K, Multi-Arith, AQuA, scorer LLMs, and Table 6 found no passage addressing the claimed comparison. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Importance of Syntactic Parsing and Inference in Semantic Role Labeling
Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2008) · International Conference on Computational Logic · doi:10.1162/coli.2008.34.2.257 · Cited by 453 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
MethodSelf-citationLearning to Automatically Solve Algebra Word Problems
Kushman, N., Zettlemoyer, L., Barzilay, R., & Artzi, Y. (2014) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1026 · Cited by 400 · cited 6× · see citing works
“(Hos-seini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al., 2014) on AI2 dataset, and we report their result here.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning to Solve Arithmetic Word Problems with Verb Categorization
Hosseini, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Etzioni, O., & Kushman, N. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1058 · Cited by 299 · cited 8× · see citing works
“(Hosseini et al., 2014) mentions the result of running the system of (Kushman et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialModeling Biological Processes for Reading Comprehension
Berant, J., Srikumar, V., Chen, P.-C., Linden, A. V., Harding, B., Huang, B., Clark, P., & Manning, C. D. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1159 · Cited by 241 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The system described in (Berant et al., 2014) attempts to automatically answer biology questions, by extracting the structure of biological processes from text.”
BackgroundInteger linear programming inference for conditional random fields
Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102444 · Cited by 214 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This has been successfully used to incorporate world knowledge at inference time, as well as getting around the need for large amounts of jointly annotated data for structured prediction (Roth and Yih, 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2005; Punyakanok et al., 2008; Clarke and Lapata, 2006; Barzilay and Lapata, 2006; Roy et al…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationReasoning about Quantities in Natural Language
Roy, S., Vieira, T., & Roth, D. (2015) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00118 · Cited by 129 · cited 6× · see citing works
“For the IL dataset, we acquired the system of (Roy et al., 2015) from the authors, and ran it with the same fold information.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationVisKE: Visual knowledge extraction and question answering by visual verification of relation phrases
Sadeghi, F., Divvala, S., & Farhadi, A. (2015) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298752 · Cited by 124 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A recent work (Sadeghi et al., 2015) tries to answer science questions by visually verifying relations from images.”
BackgroundStructured learning with constrained conditional models
Chang, M.-W., Ratinov, L., & Roth, D. (2012) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-012-5296-5 · Cited by 117 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In particular, we use the L + I scheme of CCMs, which predicts structured output by independently learning several simple components, combining them at inference time.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationDiagram Understanding in Geometry Questions
Seo, M. J., Hajishirzi, H., Farhadi, A., & Etzioni, O. (2014) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v28i1.9146 · Cited by 105 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There has also been efforts to solve geometry questions by jointly understanding diagrams and associated text (Seo et al., 2014).”
BackgroundElementary School Science and Math Tests as a Driver for AI: Take the Aristo Challenge!
Clark, P. (2015) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v29i2.19066 · Cited by 99 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our approach is related to work in understanding and solving elementary school standardized tests (Clark, 2015).”
MethodAggregation via Set Partitioning for Natural Language Generation
Barzilay, R., & Lapata, M. (2006) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1220835.1220881 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Constraint-Based Sentence Compression: An Integer Programming Approach
Clarke, J., & Lapata, M. (2006) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1273073.1273092 · Cited by 77
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Y. Goldberg and M. Elhadad. 2010. An efficient algo- rithm for easy-first non-directional dependency pars- ing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 742-750, Los Angeles, California, June.
- V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and W. Yih. 2005. The ne- cessity of syntactic parsing for semantic role label- ing. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1117-1123.
- D. Roth and W. Yih. 2004. A linear programming formulation for global inference in natural language tasks. In Hwee Tou Ng and Ellen Riloff, editors, Proc. of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 1-8. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1800 · Cited by 4,505 · see citing works
“• Math Word Problem Repository (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016): AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014): https://www.cs.washington.edu/nlp/arithmetic ; MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), license: CC BY 4.0.”
InfluentialLarge Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineers
Zhou, Y., Muresanu, A. I., Han, Z., Paster, K., Pitis, S., Chan, H., & Ba, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.01910 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
“Known as Zero-Shot-CoT, this prompting strategy improves the zero-shot performance of InstructGPT on MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016) from 17.7 to 78.7 and improves performance on GSM8K(Cobbe et al., 2021) from 10.4 to 40.7.”
MethodInfluentialA Survey of Large Language Models
Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Dong, Z., Hou, Y., Zhang, B., Min, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., et al. (2026) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-026-60308-3 · Cited by 2,093 · see citing works
“Mathematical Reasoning MATH [284], GSM8k [244], SVAMP [245], MultiArith [328], ASDiv [246], MathQA [329], AQUA-RAT [330], MAWPS [331], DROP [332], NaturalProofs [333], PISA [334], miniF2F [335], ProofNet [336]”
Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsPreprint
Wang, L., Xu, W., Lan, Y.-H., Hu, Z.-Q., Lan, Y.-S., Lee, R. K.-W., & Lim, E.-P. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.04091 · Cited by 937 · see citing works
“The proposed method is evaluated on the ten benchmark datasets from three categories of reasoning problems: Arithmetic Reasoning: (1) the GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021) dataset of high quality linguistically diverse grade school math word problems created by human problem writers, (2) the SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021) benchm…”
BackgroundInfluentialIs ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?
Qin, C., Zhang, A., Zhang, Z., Chen, J., Yasunaga, M., & Yang, D. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.85 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
“5 with 20 different datasets covering 7 representative task categories: reasoning (MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AddSub (Hos-seini et al., 2014), AQUA-RAT (Ling et al., 2017), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), CSQA (Talmor et al.,…”
BackgroundA Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models
Naveed, H., Khan, A. U., Qiu, S., Saqib, M., Anwar, S., Usman, M., Akhtar, N., Barnes, N., & Mian, A. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3744746 · Cited by 1,257 · see citing works
“SQuAD [336], BoolQ [337], SQUADv2 [338], DROP [339], RTE [340], WebQA [341], CMRC2017 [342], CMRC2018 [343], CMRC2019 [344], COTE-BD [345], COTE-DP [345], COTE-MFW [345], MultiRC [346], Natural Questions [347], CNSE [301], DRCD [348], DuReader [349], Dureader robust [350], DuReader-QG [349], SciQ [351], Sogou-log [352…”
InfluentialDeepProbLog: Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming
Manhaeve, R., Dumancic, S., Kimmig, A., Demeester, T., & Raedt, L. D. (2018) · BNAIC/BENELEARN · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.08194 · Cited by 847
“As in their work, we consider three tasks: addition, sorting [26] and word algebra problems (WAPs) [27].”
MethodDecomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex TasksPreprint
Khot, T., Trivedi, H., Finlayson, M., Fu, Y., Richardson, K., Clark, P., & Sabharwal, A. (2022) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.02406 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?
Zhang, R.-R., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Lin, H.-K., Guo, Z.-Y., Qiu, P., Zhou, A.-J., Lu, P., Chang, K.-W., Qiao, Y., et al. (2024) · European Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.14624 · Cited by 837
“…have emerged as a significant area of focus, posing considerable challenges for large foundational models, e.g., LLMs and MLLMs. Initially, datasets in this realm are designed to address basic algebraic [26] and arithmetic [50] word problems, which are relatively limited in scope and volume.”
BackgroundLarge language models are zero-shot reasoners
Kojima, T., Gu, S. (., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1613 · Cited by 2,013 · see citing works
“While our Zero-shot-CoT underperforms Few-shot-CoT with carefully-crafted and task-specific step-by-step examples, Zero-shot-CoT achieves enormous score gains compared to the zero-shot baseline, e.g. from 17.7% to 78.7% on MultiArith and from 10.4% to 40.7% on GSM8K with large-scale InstructGPT model (text-davinci-002).”
BackgroundInfluentialComplexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step ReasoningPreprint
Fu, Y., Peng, H.-C., Sabharwal, A., Clark, P., & Khot, T. (2022) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.00720 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
“It establishes new state-of-the-art results on three math reasoning datasets (GSM8K; Cobbe et al., 2021; MultiArith; Roy & Roth, 2015; MathQA; Amini et al., 2019), a temporal reasoning task (Date Understanding; Suzgun et al., 2022), and the referential game task (Penguins; Suzgun et al., 2022).”
BackgroundMethodLarge Language Models Are Reasoning Teachers
Ho, N., Schmid, L., & Yun, S.-Y. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.10071 · Cited by 605
“We can surmise that the heavily patterned nature of the tasks in MultiArith helps the student model to understand what is asked of it, eliciting correct reasoning.”
MethodInfluentialMAWPS: A Math Word Problem Repository
Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Roy, S., Amini, A., Kushman, N., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1136 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
“, 2015), logic puzzle problems (Mitra and Baral, 2015), arithmetic word problems (Hosseini et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015), algebra word problems (Kushman et al.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLLM-Adapters: An Adapter Family for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language ModelsPreprint
Hu, Z., Wang, L., Lan, Y.-H., Xu, W., Lim, E.-P., Bing, L., Xu, X., Poria, S., & Lee, R. K.-W. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.01933 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
“5 on MultiArith, AddSub, and SingleEq.”
BackgroundInfluentialBetter Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play PromptingPreprint
Kong, A.-B., Zhao, S., Chen, H., Li, Q.-C., Qin, Y., Sun, R.-Q., Zhou, X., Wang, E.-Z., & Dong, X.-H. (2023) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.07702 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
“datasets: MultiArith (Roy and Roth 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al.”
Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A SurveyPreprint
Qiao, S.-F., Ou, Y., Zhang, N., Chen, X., Yao, Y., Deng, S.-M., Tan, C.-Q., Huang, F., & Chen, H.-J. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09597 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
“Early works on this task (Hosseini et al., 2014; Kushman et al., 2014; Roy et al., 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015) focus on relatively small datasets consist-”
BackgroundUnleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models
CHEN, B. ‐., Zhang, Z., Langrené, N., & Zhu, S. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101260 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Deep Neural Solver for Math Word Problems
Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Shi, S. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1088 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
“In addition, Roy and Roth Roy et al. (2015); Roy and Roth (2016) tries to handle arithmetic problems with multiple steps and operations without depending on additional annotations or predefined templates.”
BackgroundLarge Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and ChallengesPreprint
Ahn, J., Verma, R., Lou, R., Liu, D., Zhang, R., & Yin, W. (2024) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.00157 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
“M ATH WORD PROBLEMS (MWP) are mathematical exercises or scenarios presented in the form of written or verbal descriptions rather than straight-forward equations in A RITHMETIC .”
MethodInfluentialParsing Algebraic Word Problems into Equations
Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Hajishirzi, H., Sabharwal, A., Etzioni, O., & Ang, S. D. (2015) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00160 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
“, 2015), logic puzzle problems (Mitra and Baral, 2015), arithmetic word problems (Hosseini et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015), algebra word problems (Kushman et al.”
BackgroundProgram Induction by Rationale Generation: Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problems
Ling, W., Yogatama, D., Dyer, C., & Blunsom, P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1015 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
“Extensive efforts have been made in the domain of math problem solving (Hosseini et al., 2014; Kushman et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015), which aim at obtaining the correct answer to a given math problem.”
BackgroundMathPrompter: Mathematical Reasoning using Large Language ModelsPreprint
Imani, S., Du, L., & Shrivastava, H. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.05398 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
“We use the following question ‘Q’ from the MultiArith dataset to demonstrate the problem solving process followed by MathPrompter.”
MethodInfluentialChu, Z., Chen, J.-C., Chen, Q., Yu, W., He, T., Wang, H., Peng, W., Liu, M., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.65 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
“Early benchmarks contain simple arithmetic operations (Hos-seini et al., 2014; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016).”
TheoremQA: A Theorem-driven Question Answering datasetPreprint
Chen, W., Yin, M., Ku, M. W. F., Wan, Y., Ma, X., Xu, J.-Y., Xia, T., Wang, X., & Lu, P. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.12524 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
“In the past, studies have explored the ability of NLP models to solve arithmetic and algebraic problems (Hosseini et al., 2014; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015; Ling et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSymbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also "Think" Step-by-StepPreprint
Li, L. H., Hessel, J., Yu, Y., Ren, X., Chang, K.-W., & Choi, Y. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.14050 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language ModelsPreprint
Diao, S., Wang, P., Lin, Y., Liu, X., & Zhang, T. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.12246 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
“, 2019), arithmetic reasoning (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2016; Miao et al., 2020; Cobbe et al., 2021), logical reasoning (Yu et al.”
BackgroundInjecting Numerical Reasoning Skills into Language Models
Geva, M., Gupta, A., & Berant, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.89 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language Models
Wu, Z., Arora, A., Wang, Z., Geiger, A., Jurafsky, D., Manning, C. D., & Potts, C. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.03592 · Cited by 245
“The MultiArith [Roy and Roth, 2015] dataset, which contains multi-step arithmetic problems.”
MethodGraph-to-Tree Learning for Solving Math Word Problems
Zhang, J., Wang, L., Lee, R. K.-W., Bin, Y., Wang, Y., Shao, J., & Lim, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.362 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“Inspired by the concept of Quantity Schema (Roy and Roth, 2015) and Qset (Koncel-Kedziorski et al.”
A Survey of Deep Learning for Mathematical ReasoningPreprint
Lu, P., Qiu, L., Yu, W., Welleck, S., & Chang, K.-W. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.10535 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
“Early math word problem datasets are relatively small or limited to a small number of operation steps (Hosseini et al., 2014; Kushman et al., 2014; Roy et al., 2015).”
Translating a Math Word Problem to an Expression Tree
Wang, L., Wang, Y., Cai, D., Zhang, D., & Liu, X. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.05632 · Cited by 181
“…Zhou et al., 2015; Mitra and Baral, 2016; Roy and Roth, 2018) and semantic parsing-based methods (Shi et al., 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015; Huang et al., 2017) are proposed to tackle this problem, yet they still require considerable manual ∗ The work was done when Lei…”
MethodTemplate-Based Math Word Problem Solvers with Recursive Neural Networks
Wang, L., Zhang, D., Zhang, J., Xu, X., Gao, L., Dai, B. T., & Shen, H. T. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017144 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Operationally, it combines the published word problem datasets used in (Hosseini et al. 2014; Kushman et al. 2014; Koncel-Kedziorski et al. 2015; Roy and Roth 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGuiding Large Language Models via Directional Stimulus Prompting
Li, Z., Peng, B., He, P., Galley, M., Gao, J.-F., & Yan, X. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.11520 · Cited by 167
“There are 600 examples in the MultiArith dataset [57], which we divided into [35], we use the standard test set with 254 samples, 300 samples from the standard training set for our training, and 100 samples for the standard validation set for our validation.”
MethodProgressive-Hint Prompting Improves Reasoning in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Zheng, C., Liu, Z.-Y., Xie, E.-Z., Li, Z.-G., & Li, Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.09797 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“We evaluate PHP on six datasets (AddSub [26], MultiArith [27], SingleEQ [28], SVAMP [11], GSM8K [12], AQuA [13]) and MATH [14].”
InfluentialNumGLUE: A Suite of Fundamental yet Challenging Mathematical Reasoning TasksPreprint
Mishra, S. R., Mitra, A., Varshney, N., Sachdeva, B., Clark, P. A., Baral, C. R., & Kalyan, A. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05660 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Difficulty of questions were increased in subsequent datasets (Roy and Roth, 2016), (Upadhyay et al.”
BackgroundOn the Advance of Making Language Models Better ReasonersPreprint
Li, Y., Lin, Z., Zhang, S., Fu, Q., Chen, B., Lou, J.-G., & Chen, W.-Z. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.02336 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“7% ), MultiArith ( 99 .”
BackgroundMethodProgramming with a Differentiable Forth InterpreterPreprint
Bošnjak, M., Rocktäschel, T., Naradowsky, J., & Riedel, S. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.06640 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“In previous work, local classifiers (Roy & Roth, 2015; Roy et al., 2015), hand-crafted grammars (Koncel-Kedziorski et al.”
BackgroundMulti-Step Reasoning with Large Language Models, a Survey
Plaat, A., Wong, A., Verberne, S., Broekens, J., van Stein, B., & Bäck, T. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3774896 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“The Chain-of-thought idea itself is inspired by earlier work where natural language steps are generated for arithmetic reasoning [30, 85], and the use of formal languages for reasoning [3, 20, 22, 121].”
How well do Computers Solve Math Word Problems? Large-Scale Dataset Construction and Evaluation
Huang, D.-Q., Shi, S., Lin, C.-Y., Yin, J., & Ma, W.-Y. (2016) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1084 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
“Koncel-Kedziorski et al. (2015) and Roy and Roth (2015) target math problems that can be solved by one single linear equation.”
BackgroundEscape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step Reasoning
Li, Y.-W., Yuan, P.-W., Feng, S., Pan, B.-Y., Wang, X.-L., Sun, B., Wang, H., & Li, K. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.10480 · Cited by 157
“MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) and ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020) are not chosen in this paper because they are relatively simple.”
BackgroundPrompt Engineering a Prompt EngineerPreprint
Ye, Q., Axmed, M., Pryzant, R., & Khani, F. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.05661 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“In this case, PE2 is able to discover a high quality prompt from scratch that matches with “Let’s think step by step” on MultiArith.”
MethodInfluentialSurvey on Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models: Methods, Evaluation, and Application
Yang, C., Zhu, Y. T., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Gao, C., Yan, B., & Chen, Y. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3699518 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Batch Prompting: Efficient Inference with Large Language Model APIs
Cheng, Z.-J., Kasai, J., & Yu, T. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.08721 · Cited by 152
“…datasets across commonsense question answering, arithmetic reasoning, and natural language understanding/inference: CommonsenseQA (Talmor et al., 2019), StrategyQA (Geva et al., 2021 (Roy and Roth, 2015), RTE (Bentivogli et al., 2009), MNLI (Williams et al., 2018), and SST-5 (Socher et al., 2013).”
BackgroundLarge Language Models as Optimizers
Yang, C., Wang, X., Lu, Y., Liu, H., Le, Q. V., Zhou, D., & Chen, X. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.03409 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
“To examine the transferability of the optimized instructions, we also evaluate the instructions optimized for GSM8K on two other mathematical reasoning datasets, i.e., MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016) and AQuA (Ling et al., 2017).”
The Gap of Semantic Parsing: A Survey on Automatic Math Word Problem Solvers
Zhang, D., Wang, L., Zhang, L., Dai, B. T., & Shen, H. T. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2914054 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
“The idea of tree-based approaches [26], [27], [28], [15] is to transform the derivation of the arithmetic expression to constructing an equivalent tree structure step by step in a bottom-up manner.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLiu, H., Zheng, Z.-L., Qiao, Y., Duan, H., Fei, Z.-W., Zhou, F., Zhang, W.-W., Zhang, S.-Y., Lin, D.-H., & Chen, K. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.12209 · Cited by 149
“Similarly, datasets like AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) and SingleOp (Roy et al., 2015) MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016) are exclusively dedicated to fundamental arithmetic operations: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.”
MethodTeaching Arithmetic to Small Transformers
Lee, N., Sreenivasan, K., Lee, J. D., Lee, K., & Papailiopoulos, D. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.03381 · Cited by 145
“Ling et al. (2017); Cobbe et al. (2021); Nye et al. (2021) use natural language to generate reasoning steps while Roy & Roth (2016); Reed & De Freitas (2015); Chen et al. (2017); Cai et al. (2017) show that symbolic reasoning may suffice.”
BackgroundBoosting Language Models Reasoning with Chain-of-Knowledge Prompting
Wang, J., Sun, Q., Chen, N., Li, X. L., & Gao, M. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.06427 · Cited by 145
“, 2017], MultiArith [Roy and Roth, 2015] for math problem solving tasks.”
BackgroundG-Designer: Architecting Multi-agent Communication Topologies via Graph Neural NetworksPreprint
Zhang, G., Yue, Y., Sun, X., Wan, G., Yu, M., Fang, J., Wang, K., Chen, T., & Cheng, D. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11782 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…G , G-Designer topology G 𝑐𝑜𝑚 auto-encoder (VGAE) framework [34, 84], G-Designer employs a 𝑣 where 𝑓 𝑣 is the encoder-decoder architecture with parameters Θ 𝑣 𝑞 (·) is the encoder module, 𝑝 (·) is the decoder module. low-dimensional latent vector representations H…”
Orca-Math: Unlocking the potential of SLMs in Grade School MathPreprint
Mitra, A., Khanpour, H., Rosset, C., & Awadallah, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.14830 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
“We start by collecting sample math word problems from existing open-source datasets, namely NumGLUE [26], AddSub [13], ALGES [17], ASDiv [24], DRAW [35], GSM8k [7], MATHQA [2], MultiArith [32], SingeOP [33], SingleEQ [16], and SVAMP [30].”
MethodLLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive Into Reasoning Large Language Models
Kumar, K., Ashraf, T., Thawakar, O., Anwer, R., Cholakkal, H., Shah, M., Yang, M.-H., Torr, P. H. S., Khan, S. H., & Khan, F. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2026.3720414 · Cited by 137
Semantically-Aligned Equation Generation for Solving and Reasoning Math Word Problems
Chiang, T.-R., & Chen, Y.-N. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1272 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“The The results are consistent with those hand-craft features for solving math word problems proposed by the prior research (Hos-seini et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015; Roy et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Tasks
Zhu, K., Chen, J., Wang, J.-D., Gong, N., Yang, D., & Xie, X. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.17167 · Cited by 127
MathDQN: Solving Arithmetic Word Problems via Deep Reinforcement Learning
Wang, L., Zhang, D., Gao, L., Song, J., Guo, L. Z., & Shen, H. T. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11981 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“Recently, UnitDep (Roy and Roth 2017) augments the scoring function of the expression tree in (Roy and Roth 2015) by further considering the consistence of rate unit associated with the quantities.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning To Use Formulas To Solve Simple Arithmetic Problems
Mitra, A., & Baral, C. R. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1202 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
“Broadly speaking, common to the existing approaches (Kushman et al., 2014; Hosseini et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2015; Shi et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015) is the task of grounding, that takes as input a word problem in the natural language and represents it in a formal language, such as, a system of equations, express…”
BackgroundLet's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning
Ma, Q.-L., Zhou, H., Liu, T.-K., Yuan, J., Liu, P., You, Y., & Yang, H. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.10080 · Cited by 120
“Key datasets for mathematical reasoning are GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MATH (Hendrycks et al., 2021), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015), and SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015) while code generation evaluations employ HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021), MBPP (Austin et al., 2021), and DS1…”
MethodNaturalProofs: Mathematical Theorem Proving in Natural LanguagePreprint
Welleck, S., Liu, J., Bras, R. J. L., Hajishirzi, H., Choi, Y., & Cho, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.01112 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Solving Math Word Problems via Cooperative Reasoning induced Language Models
Zhu, X., Wang, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., Gan, R., Zhang, J., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.245 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“, 2016), c: UNITDEP (Roy and Roth, 2017), d: Relevance and LCA operation classifier (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
BackgroundMapping to Declarative Knowledge for Word Problem Solving
Roy, S., & Roth, D. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00012 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“Consequently, there has been a growing interest in developing automated methods to solve math word problems (Kushman et al., 2014; Hosseini et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationThink Silently, Think Fast: Dynamic Latent Compression of LLM Reasoning Chains
Tan, W., Li, J.-Z., Ju, J.-Z., Luo, Z.-B., Song, R.-H., & Luan, J. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.16552 · Cited by 112
“…methods on three out-of-domain math reasoning datasets: (1) GSM-Hard [9], a modified version of GSM8K with approximately 1k test samples featuring larger magnitude numbers, (2) SVAMP [20] and (3) MultiArith [21], two simpler math reasoning datasets with 1k and 600 test samples, respectively.”
Modeling Intra-Relation in Math Word Problems with Different Functional Multi-Head Attentions
Li, J., Wang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Dai, B. T., & Zhang, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1619 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“…and Baral, 2016; Roy and Roth, 2018; Zhou et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2016) and semantic parsing-based methods (Shi et al., 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015; Huang et al., 2017), these methods do not need hand-crafted features and achieve high performance on large datasets.”
MethodNeural probabilistic logic programming in DeepProbLog
Manhaeve, R., Dumančić, S., Kimmig, A., Demeester, T., & De Raedt, L. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103504 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“As in their work, we consider three tasks: addition, sorting [26] and word algebra problems (WAPs) [27].”
MethodCalibrating Large Language Models with Sample ConsistencyPreprint
Lyu, Q., Shridhar, K., Malaviya, C., Zhang, L., Elazar, Y., Tandon, N., Apidianaki, M., Sachan, M., & Callison-Burch, C. (2024) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.13904 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Unit Dependency Graph and Its Application to Arithmetic Word Problem Solving
Roy, S., & Roth, D. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10959 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“The evaluation of (Roy and Roth 2015) was done separately on different types of arithmetic problems.”
InfluentialSelf-citationTree-structured Decoding for Solving Math Word Problems
Liu, Q., Guan, W., Li, S., & Kawahara, D. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1241 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“The first research line maps a problem text into logical forms, and then uses the logical forms to obtain the equation (Shi et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015; Huang et al., 2017; Roy and Roth, 2018).”
BackgroundMetacognitive Capabilities of LLMs: An Exploration in Mathematical Problem Solving
Didolkar, A., Goyal, A., Ke, N., Guo, S.-Y., Valko, M., Lillicrap, T. P., Rezende, D. J., Bengio, Y., Mozer, M., & Arora, S. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.12205 · Cited by 102
“Tables 11, 17, and 18 illustrate examples from the skill exemplar repositories for the GSM-8k and MATH datasets respectively created using GPT-4-0613 .”
Numeracy for Language Models: Evaluating and Improving their Ability to Predict Numbers
Spithourakis, G., & Riedel, S. (2018) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1196 · Cited by 100
“Much work has been done in solving arithmetic (Mitra and Baral, 2016; Hosseini et al., 2014; Roy and Roth, 2016), geometric (Seo et al., 2015), and algebraic problems (Zhou et al., 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Upadhyay et al., 2016; Upadhyay and Chang, 2016; Shi et al., 2015; Kush-man et…”
BackgroundLimitations of Language Models in Arithmetic and Symbolic InductionPreprint
Qian, J., Wang, H., Li, Z., LI, S., & Yan, X.-F. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.05051 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“Although these models exhibit surprisingly impressive capabilities in complex arithmetic reasoning tasks, such as MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015) and GSM8k (Cobbe et al.”
BackgroundPrompting Techniques for Secure Code Generation: A Systematic Investigation
Tony, C., Ferreyra, N. E. D., Mutas, M., Dhiff, S., & Scandariato, R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3722108 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“I n s t r u c t G P T , P a L M S i n g l e E q [ 49 ] , A dd S u b [ 38 ] , M u l t i A r i t h [ 82 ] , A Q U A R A T [ 58 ] , G S M 8 K [ 17 ] , S V A M P [ 71 ] , L a s t L e tt e r C o n c a t e n a t i o n [ 103 ] , C o i n F l i p [ 103 ] , C o mm o n s e n s e Q A [ 91 ] , S t r a t e g y Q…”
InfluentialLearning to Reason Deductively: Math Word Problem Solving as Complex Relation ExtractionPreprint
Jie, Z., Li, J., & Lu, W. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.10316 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“As a result we also consider the “reverse operation” for division and subtraction (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
BackgroundDemystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughts
Besta, M., Memedi, F., Zhang, Z., Gerstenberger, R., Piao, G., Blach, N., Nyczyk, P., Copik, M., Kwaśniewski, G., Müller, J., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3598182 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Large Language Models are In-Context Semantic Reasoners rather than Symbolic Reasoners
Tang, X., Zheng, Z., Li, J., Meng, F., Zhu, S.-C., Liang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14825 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“This significantly improves the performance on arithmetic [26], commonsense [21, 27], and symbolic reasoning [5] benchmarks.”
Making Language Models Better Tool Learners with Execution FeedbackPreprint
Qiao, S.-F., Gui, H., Lv, C.-F., Jia, Q.-H., Chen, H.-J., & Zhang, N. (2023) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.13068 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“In the future, more sophisticated trial-and-error processes and feedback mechanisms will be necessary to teach the LMs to better utilize tools and even create new tools.”
BackgroundAlexaTM 20B: Few-Shot Learning Using a Large-Scale Multilingual Seq2Seq ModelPreprint
Soltan, S., Ananthakrishnan, S., FitzGerald, J. G. M., Gupta, R., Hamza, W., Khan, H., Peris, C., Rawls, S., Rosenbaum, A., Rumshisky, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.01448 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“In this section, we share AlexaTM 20B performance on MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2016) dataset.”
MethodLearning Fine-Grained Expressions to Solve Math Word Problems
Huang, D.-Q., Shi, S., Lin, C.-Y., & Yin, J. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1084 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“Roy and Roth (2015); Koncel-Kedziorski et al. (2015) assume there is only one unknown variable in the problem and cannot derive math concepts involving constants or more than one unknown variables, such as “ the product of two unknown numbers ”.”
BackgroundInfluentialLarge Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verification
Weng, Y., Zhu, M., Xia, F., Li, B., He, S., Liu, S., Sun, B., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.167 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“Table 7 – Continued from previous page Dataset Question Self-Verification MultiArith Q: Luke was organizing his baseball cards in a binder with 3 on each page.”
InfluentialDon't Trust: Verify - Grounding LLM Quantitative Reasoning with Autoformalization
Zhou, J.-P., Staats, C., Li, W.-D., Szegedy, C., Weinberger, K. Q., & Wu, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.18120 · Cited by 91
“We demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of DTV by reaching state-of-the-art performance on GSM8K, subsets of MATH and MultiArith datasets.”
MethodInfluentialToward large reasoning models: A survey of reinforced reasoning with large language models
Xu, F., Hao, Q., Shao, C., Zong, Z., Li, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Lan, X., Gong, J., et al. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101370 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Make Every Penny Count: Difficulty-Adaptive Self-Consistency for Cost-Efficient Reasoning
Wang, X.-L., Feng, S., Li, Y.-W., Yuan, P.-W., Zhang, Y.-Q., Tan, C.-Y., Pan, B.-Y., Hu, Y., & Li, K. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.13457 · Cited by 90
“MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014) and ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020) are not chosen in this paper because they are relatively simple.”
DeepStochLog: Neural Stochastic Logic Programming
Winters, T., Marra, G., Manhaeve, R., & Raedt, L. D. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i9.21248 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“This dataset of this task contains 300 training instances and was introduced in [32].”
BackgroundMethodEQUATE: A Benchmark Evaluation Framework for Quantitative Reasoning in Natural Language Inference
Ravichander, A., Naik, A., Rosé, C. P., & Hovy, E. H. (2019) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k19-1033 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Our work also relates to solving arithmetic word problems (Hoss-eini et al., 2014; Mitra and Baral, 2016; Zhou et al., 2015; Upadhyay et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2017; Kushman et al., 2014a; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2016; Roy, 2017; Ling et al., 2017).”
MethodCorex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model CollaborationPreprint
Sun, Q., Yin, Z., Li, X., Wu, Z., Qiu, X.-P., & Kong, L.-P. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.00280 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“We evaluate the effectiveness of Corex across four types of reasoning tasks: (1) Arithmetic reasoning over eight mathematical problems, which includes GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy & Roth, 2015), SingleOP/SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017),…”
InfluentialBetter Zero-Shot Reasoning with Self-Adaptive Prompting
Wan, X., Sun, R., Dai, H.-J., Arik, S. Ö., & Pfister, T. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14106 · Cited by 87
“We consider the following arithmetic and logical reasoning tasks: AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), GSM-8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), CSQA (Talmor et al., 2019) and StrategyQA (Geva et al., 2021).”
MethodInfluentialRamamonjison, R., Li, H., Yu, T. T. L., He, S., Rengan, V., Banitalebi-Dehkordi, A., Zhou, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.15565 · Cited by 85
“, 2017; Ughade and Kumbhar, 2019) Most existing MWP datasets have focused on returning the solutions of elementary arithmetic problems (Roy and Roth, 2015; KoncelKedziorski et al., 2016) and algebra problems (Kushman et al.”
BackgroundA Knowledge-Aware Sequence-to-Tree Network for Math Word Problem Solving
Wu, Q., Zhang, Q., Fu, J.-L., & Huang, X. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.579 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Early statistical learning methods (Feigenbaum et al., 1963; Fletcher, 1985; Bakman, 2007; Roy and Roth, 2016) extracted templates or features from problems and generated corresponding math expressions based on these templates or features.”
BackgroundMethodLi, S.-Y., Liu, Y.-X., Wen, Q.-S., Zhang, C.-Q., & Pan, S.-R. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.18224 · Cited by 80
Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors are Universal LearnersPreprint
Malach, E. (2023) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.06979 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“The technique was found to be particularly beneficial in solving arithmetic problems (Roy & Roth, 2016).”
MethodEvaluating and Improving Tool-Augmented Computation-Intensive Math Reasoning
Zhang, B., Zhou, K., Wei, X., Zhao, W. X., Sha, J., Wang, S., & Wen, J.-R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.02408
A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solvers
Miao, S.-Y., Liang, C.-C., & Su, K.-Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.92 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
“Current MWP corpora can be classified into four categories: (1) the Number Word Problem corpus (Shi et al., 2015), which contains number word problems only; (2) the Arithmetic Word Problem corpora (Hosseini et al., 2014; Roy et al., 2015), which involve the four basic arithmetic operations”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChu, Z., Chen, J., Chen, Q., Yu, W., He, T., Wang, H., Peng, W., Liu, M., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.15402 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Early benchmarks contain simple arithmetic operations (Hos-seini et al., 2014; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015; Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2016).”
Re-Reading Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models
Xu, X., Tao, C., Shen, T., Xu, C., Xu, H., Long, G., Lou, J.-G., & Ma, S. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.871 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“…(Cobbe et al., 2021), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), ASDiv (Miao et al., 2020), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015), SingelEQ (Roy et al., 2015), three commonsense reasoning benchmarks (CSQA (Talmor et al., 2019), StrategyQA (Geva et al., 2021),…”
BackgroundInfluentialNeural-Symbolic Solver for Math Word Problems with Auxiliary Tasks
Qin, J., Liang, X., Hong, Y., Tang, J., & Lin, L. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.456 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“…ranging from rule-based meth-ods (Bakman, 2007; Yuhui et al., 2010), statistical machine learning methods (Kushman et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2015; Roy and Roth, 2015, 2016; Mitra and Baral, 2016; Huang et al., 2016; Roy and Roth, 2018), semantic parsing methods (Shi et al., 2015;…”
MethodPolyMath: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning in Multilingual Contexts
Wang, Y., Zhang, P., Tang, J.-L., Wei, H.-R., Yang, B.-S., Wang, R., Sun, C., Sun, F., Zhang, J., Wu, J.-X., et al. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.18428 · Cited by 72
“In recent years, mathematical reasoning benchmarks have closely evolved alongside LLMs, covering almost every domain from basic math word problems (Roy & Roth, 2015; Cobbe et al., 2021) to complex multidisciplinary calculations and proofs (Hendrycks et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2023), and even to…”
SIM-CoT: Supervised Implicit Chain-of-ThoughtPreprint
Wei, X.-L., Liu, X., Zang, Y., Dong, X.-W., Cao, Y.-H., Wang, J., Qiu, X.-P., & Lin, D.-H. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.20317 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“To further examine generalization beyond the training domain, we include three out-of-domain benchmarks: GSM-Hard, which contains more challenging arithmetic problems with subtle variations in reasoning steps; MultiArith, which evaluates performance on multi-step arithmetic operations requiring careful sequencing of a…”
InfluentialLuo, T., Lei, J., Lei, F., Liu, W., He, S.-Z., Zhao, J., & Liu, K. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.12851 · Cited by 69
“The math reasoning tasks includes a total of 6 benchmarks: AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), AQuA (Ling et al., 2017), gsm8k (Cobbe et al., 2021), MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2016), SingleEQ (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021).”
Symbol-LLM: Towards Foundational Symbol-centric Interface For Large Language Models
Xu, F., Wu, Z., Sun, Q., Ren, S., Yuan, F., Yuan, S., Lin, Q.-K., Qiao, Y., & Liu, J. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09278 · Cited by 69
“The datasets include GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), MATH (Hendrycks et al., 2021b), GSM-Hard (Gao et al., 2023), SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), Asdiv (Miao et al., 2020), AddSub (Hos-seini et al., 2014), SingleEQ (Roy et al., 2015), SingleOP (Roy et al., 2015) and MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
MethodSelf-Polish: Enhance Reasoning in Large Language Models via Problem RefinementPreprint
Xi, Z., Jin, S.-J., Zhou, Y., Zheng, R., Gao, S., Liu, J., Gui, T., Zhang, Q., & Huang, X. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14497 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“8% on MultiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015).”
MethodTab-CoT: Zero-shot Tabular Chain of ThoughtPreprint
Jin, Z., & Lü, W. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.17812 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Specifically, they are SingleEq (Koncel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), Mul-tiArith (Roy and Roth, 2015), GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), AQUA-RAT (Ling et al., 2017), and SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), which are standard datasets widely used in the community.”
BackgroundForward-Backward Reasoning in Large Language Models for Mathematical Verification
Jiang, W., Shi, H., Yu, L., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, Z.-G., & Kwok, J. T. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.397 · Cited by 66
“…are commonly used in evaluating CoT reasoning ability (Zheng et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023): (i) AddSub (Hosseini et al., 2014), (ii) Multi-Arith (Roy and Roth, 2015), (iii) SingleEQ (Kon-cel-Kedziorski et al., 2015), (iv) SVAMP (Patel et al., 2021), (v) GSM8K (Cobbe et al., 2021), (vi) AQuA…”
Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, X.-B., Ding, L., Zhang, M., Liu, J., & Zhang, M. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.18891 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“When trained on the more challenging AQuA dataset, it achieves an average performance improvement of 1.59 over the SOTA method, while for the simpler MultiArith dataset, the average improvement is 0.81.”
Influential
- Authors
- Roy, S., & Roth, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roth, Dan
- ORCID
- Roth, Dan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1743-1752
- arXiv
- 1608.01413
- OpenAlex
- W2251935656
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0008, FA8750)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Keywords
- arithmetic word problems, automated problem solving, expression trees, constrained inference, world knowledge, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review