The Best Defense is a Good Offense: Countering LLM-Powered Cyberattacks
Open accessAbstract
As large language models (LLMs) continue to evolve, their potential use in automating cyberattacks becomes increasingly likely. With capabilities such as reconnaissance, exploitation, and command execution, LLMs could soon become integral to autonomous cyber agents, capable of launching highly sophisticated attacks. In this paper, we introduce novel defense strategies that exploit the inherent vulnerabilities of attacking LLMs. By targeting weaknesses such as biases, trust in input, memory limitations, and their tunnel-vision approach to problem-solving, we develop techniques to mislead, delay, or neutralize these autonomous agents. We evaluate our defenses under black-box conditions, starting with single prompt-response scenarios and progressing to real-world tests using custom-built CTF machines. Our results show defense success rates of up to 90\%, demonstrating the effectiveness of turning LLM vulnerabilities into defensive strategies against LLM-driven cyber threats.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rephrasing offers limited protection against memory injection attacks.
“and rephrasing offers limited protection (Ayzenshteyn et al., 2024).”
From A-MemGuard: A Proactive Defense Framework for LLM-Based Agent Memory (2025) · cites this paper as Ayzenshteyn et al., 2024
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A-MemGuard: A Proactive Defense Framework for LLM-Based Agent Memory
Wei, Q., Yang, T., Wang, Y., Li, X., Li, L., Yin, Z., Zhan, Y., Holz, T., Lin, Z., & Wang, X. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02373 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Similarly, perplexity filters overlook blended manipulations (Alon & Kamfonas, 2023; Chen et al., 2024), and rephrasing offers limited protection (Ayzenshteyn et al., 2024).”
- Authors
- Ayzenshteyn, D., Weiss, R., & Mirsky, Y.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2410.15396
- OpenAlex
- W4404088631
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Keywords
- large language models, LLM vulnerabilities, memory constraints, black-box evaluation, adversarial prompting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
