PreprintCited by 4Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisImage and Video Quality Assessment

Automatic Evaluation for Text-to-image Generation: Task-decomposed Framework, Distilled Training, and Meta-evaluation Benchmark

Open access
Tu, Rong-Cheng, Ma, Zi-Ao, Lan, Tian, Zhao, Yuehao, Huang, Heyan, Mao, Xian-Ling·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Driven by the remarkable progress in diffusion models, text-to-image generation has made significant strides, creating a pressing demand for automatic quality evaluation of generated images. Current state-of-the-art automatic evaluation methods heavily rely on Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), particularly powerful commercial models like GPT-4o. While these models are highly effective, their substantial costs limit scalability in large-scale evaluations. Adopting open-source MLLMs is an alternative; however, their performance falls short due to significant limitations in processing multi-modal data compared to commercial MLLMs. To tackle these problems, we first propose a task decomposition evaluation framework based on GPT-4o to automatically construct a new training dataset, where the complex evaluation task is decoupled into simpler sub-tasks, effectively reducing the learning complexity. Based on this dataset, we design innovative training strategies to effectively distill GPT-4o's evaluation capabilities into a 7B open-source MLLM, MiniCPM-V-2.6. Furthermore, to reliably and comprehensively assess prior works and our proposed model, we manually annotate a meta-evaluation benchmark that includes chain-of-thought explanations alongside quality scores for generated images. Experimental results demonstrate that our distilled open-source MLLM significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art GPT-4o-base baseline, VIEScore, with over 4.6\% improvement in Spearman and Kendall correlations with human judgments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2411.15488

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A particularly promising evaluation approach is fine-tuning MLLM 'judges' on context-aware or community-sensitive data.

    “A particularly promising evaluation approach is fine-tuning MLLM 'judges' on context-aware or community-sensitive data [75, 111].”

    From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Fine-tuning Settings and §5.3.1 describe fine-tuning MLLMs as automatic evaluators and report improved evaluation performance. The Text-to-image Generation section describes training on paired prompts and images, which supports task-specific context, but our copy does not describe community-sensitive training data or establish that tailoring data to communities improves evaluation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774. · arXiv
  2. Hanqun Cao, Cheng Tan, Zhangyang Gao, Yilun Xu, Guangyong Chen, Pheng-Ann Heng, and Stan Z Li. 2024a. A survey on generative diffusion models. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engi- neering.
  3. Pu Cao, Feng Zhou, Qing Song, and Lu Yang. 2024b. Controllable generation with text-to-image diffusion models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.04279. · arXiv
  4. Zhe Chen, Weiyun Wang, Hao Tian, Shenglong Ye, Zhangwei Gao, Erfei Cui, Wenwen Tong, Kongzhi Hu, Jiapeng Luo, Zheng Ma, et al. 2024. How far are we to gpt-4v? closing the gap to commercial multimodal models with open-source suites. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16821. · arXiv
  5. Jaemin Cho, Yushi Hu, Jason Baldridge, Roopal Garg, Peter Anderson, Ranjay Krishna, Mohit Bansal, Jordi Pont-Tuset, and Su Wang. 2024. Davidsonian scene graph: Improving reliability in fine-grained evalua- tion for text-to-image generation. In ICLR.
  6. Tri Dao. 2024. FlashAttention-2: Faster attention with better parallelism and work partitioning. In Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  7. Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Yuhang Zang, Yuhang Cao, Bin Wang, Linke Ouyang, Xilin Wei, Songyang Zhang, Haodong Duan, Maosong Cao, Wenwei Zhang, Yining Li, Hang Yan, Yang Gao, Xinyue Zhang, Wei Li, Jingwen Li, Kai Chen, Conghui He, Xingcheng Zhang, Yu Qiao, Dahua Lin, and Jiaqi Wang. 2024. Internlm-xcomposer2: Master- ing free-form text-image composition and compre- hension in vision-language large model. Preprint, arXiv:2401.16420. · arXiv
  8. Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas Müller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Do- minik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, Dustin Podell, Tim Dockhorn, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Alex Goodwin, Yannik Marek, and Robin Rom- bach. 2024. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. Preprint, arXiv:2403.03206. · arXiv
  9. Stephanie Fu, Netanel Tamir, Shobhita Sundaram, Lucy Chai, Richard Zhang, Tali Dekel, and Phillip Isola. 2023. Dreamsim: Learning new dimensions of hu- man visual similarity using synthetic data. Preprint, arXiv:2306.09344. · arXiv
  10. Kotaro Hara, Abigail Adams, Kristy Milland, Saiph Savage, Chris Callison-Burch, and Jeffrey P Bigham. 2018. A data-driven analysis of workers' earnings on amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1-14.
  11. Jack Hessel, Ari Holtzman, Maxwell Forbes, Ronan Le Bras, and Yejin Choi. 2021. Clipscore: A reference- free evaluation metric for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08718. · arXiv
  12. Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. 2017. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems, 30.
  13. Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. 2020. De- noising diffusion probabilistic models. Preprint, arXiv:2006.11239. · arXiv
  14. Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2021. Lora: Low-rank adap- tation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685. · arXiv
  15. Shengding Hu, Yuge Tu, Xu Han, Chaoqun He, Ganqu Cui, Xiang Long, Zhi Zheng, Yewei Fang, Yuxiang Huang, Weilin Zhao, Xinrong Zhang, Zheng Leng Thai, Kaihuo Zhang, Chongyi Wang, Yuan Yao, Chenyang Zhao, Jie Zhou, Jie Cai, Zhongwu Zhai, Ning Ding, Chao Jia, Guoyang Zeng, Dahai Li, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2024. Minicpm: Unveiling the potential of small language mod- els with scalable training strategies. Preprint, arXiv:2404.06395. · arXiv
  16. Yushi Hu, Benlin Liu, Jungo Kasai, Yizhong Wang, Mari Ostendorf, Ranjay Krishna, and Noah A Smith. 2023. Tifa: Accurate and interpretable text-to-image faithfulness evaluation with question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Confer- ence on Computer Vision, pages 20406-20417.
  17. Tero Karras, Timo Aila, Samuli Laine, and Jaakko Lehtinen. 2018. Progressive growing of gans for improved quality, stability, and variation. Preprint, arXiv:1710.10196. · arXiv
  18. Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. 2019. A style-based generator architecture for generative ad- versarial networks. Preprint, arXiv:1812.04948. · arXiv
  19. Max Ku, Dongfu Jiang, Cong Wei, Xiang Yue, and Wenhu Chen. 2023. Viescore: Towards explainable metrics for conditional image synthesis evaluation. Preprint, arXiv:2312.14867. · arXiv
  20. Tian Lan, Xian-Ling Mao, Wei Wei, Xiaoyan Gao, and Heyan Huang. 2020. Pone: A novel automatic eval- uation metric for open-domain generative dialogue systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 39(1). · DOI
  21. Tian Lan, Wenwei Zhang, Chengqi Lyu, Shuaibin Li, Chen Xu, Heyan Huang, Dahua Lin, Xian-Ling Mao, and Kai Chen. 2024a. Training language models to critique with multi-agent feedback. Preprint, arXiv:2410.15287. · arXiv
  22. Tian Lan, Wenwei Zhang, Chen Xu, Heyan Huang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen, and Xian ling Mao. 2024b. Criticeval: Evaluating large language model as critic. Preprint, arXiv:2402.13764. · arXiv
  23. Daiqing Li, Aleks Kamko, Ehsan Akhgari, Ali Sa- bet, Linmiao Xu, and Suhail Doshi. 2024. Play- ground v2.5: Three insights towards enhancing aes- thetic quality in text-to-image generation. Preprint, arXiv:2402.17245. · arXiv
  24. Dawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi, Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Amrita Bhat- tacharjee, Yuxuan Jiang, Canyu Chen, Tianhao Wu, Kai Shu, Lu Cheng, and Huan Liu. 2025. From gen- eration to judgment: Opportunities and challenges of llm-as-a-judge. Preprint, arXiv:2411.16594. · arXiv
  25. Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, and Steven Hoi. 2023a. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre- training with frozen image encoders and large lan- guage models. Preprint, arXiv:2301.12597. · arXiv
  26. Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, and Steven Hoi. 2022. Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre- training for unified vision-language understanding and generation. In International conference on ma- chine learning, pages 12888-12900.
  27. PMLR.
  28. Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, Lubomir Bourdev, Ross Girshick, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, C. Lawrence Zitnick, and Piotr Dol- lár. 2015. Microsoft coco: Common objects in con- text. Preprint, arXiv:1405.0312. · arXiv
  29. Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. 2014. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision- ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pages 740-755. Springer.
  30. Zhiqiu Lin, Deepak Pathak, Baiqi Li, Jiayao Li, Xide Xia, Graham Neubig, Pengchuan Zhang, and Deva Ramanan. 2024a. Evaluating text-to-visual gen- eration with image-to-text generation. Preprint, arXiv:2404.01291. · arXiv
  31. Zhiqiu Lin, Deepak Pathak, Baiqi Li, Jiayao Li, Xide Xia, Graham Neubig, Pengchuan Zhang, and Deva Ramanan. 2024b. Evaluating text-to-visual gener- ation with image-to-text generation. In Computer Vision -ECCV 2024 -18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29-October 4, 2024, Pro- ceedings, Part IX, volume 15067 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 366-384. Springer. · DOI
  32. Bingchen Liu, Ehsan Akhgari, Alexander Visheratin, Aleks Kamko, Linmiao Xu, Shivam Shrirao, Chase Lambert, Joao Souza, Suhail Doshi, and Daiqing Li. 2024. Playground v3: Improving text-to-image alignment with deep-fusion large language models. Preprint, arXiv:2409.10695. · arXiv
  33. Yang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang, Ruochen Xu, and Chenguang Zhu. 2023. G-eval: Nlg evaluation using gpt-4 with better human align- ment. Preprint, arXiv:2303.16634. · arXiv
  34. Yi-Fan Lu, Xian-Ling Mao, Tian Lan, Heyan Huang, Chen Xu, and Xiaoyan Gao. 2025a. Beyond exact match: Semantically reassessing event extraction by large language models. Preprint, arXiv:2410.09418. · arXiv
  35. Yi-Fan Lu, Xian-Ling Mao, Tian Lan, Tong Zhang, Yu- Shi Zhu, and Heyan Huang. 2025b. Seoe: A scalable and reliable semantic evaluation framework for open domain event detection. Preprint, arXiv:2503.03303. · arXiv
  36. Yujie Lu, Xianjun Yang, Xiujun Li, Xin Eric Wang, and William Yang Wang. 2023. Llmscore: Unveiling the power of large language models in text-to-image synthesis evaluation. Preprint, arXiv:2305.11116. · arXiv
  37. Junyu Luo, Weizhi Zhang, Ye Yuan, Yusheng Zhao, Jun- wei Yang, Yiyang Gu, Bohan Wu, Binqi Chen, Ziyue Qiao, Qingqing Long, Rongcheng Tu, Xiao Luo, Wei Ju, Zhiping Xiao, Yifan Wang, Meng Xiao, Chenwu Liu, Jingyang Yuan, Shichang Zhang, Yiqiao Jin, Fan Zhang, Xian Wu, Hanqing Zhao, Dacheng Tao, Philip S. Yu, and Ming Zhang. 2025. Large language model agent: A survey on methodology, applications and challenges. CoRR, abs/2503.21460. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Zi-Ao Ma, Tian Lan, Rong-Cheng Tu, Yong Hu, Heyan Huang, and Xian-Ling Mao. 2024. Multi-modal re- trieval augmented multi-modal generation: A bench- mark, evaluate metrics and strong baselines. CoRR, abs/2411.16365. · DOI
  39. Zi-Ao Ma, Tian Lan, Rong-Cheng Tu, Yong Hu, Yu-Shi Zhu, Tong Zhang, Heyan Huang, and Xian-Ling Mao. 2025. Multi-modal retrieval augmented multi-modal generation: Datasets, evaluation metrics and strong baselines. Preprint, arXiv:2411.16365. · arXiv
  40. Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, Xu Jiang, Karl Cobbe, Tyna Eloundou, Gretchen Krueger, Kevin Button, Matthew Knight, Benjamin Chess, and John Schulman. 2022. Webgpt: Browser- assisted question-answering with human feedback. Preprint, arXiv:2112.09332. · arXiv
  41. William Peebles and Saining Xie. 2023. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. Preprint, arXiv:2212.09748. · arXiv
  42. Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas Müller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. 2023. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. Preprint, arXiv:2307.01952. · arXiv
  43. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sas- try, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. 2021. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International confer- ence on machine learning, pages 8748-8763.
  44. PMLR.
  45. Samyam Rajbhandari, Jeff Rasley, Olatunji Ruwase, and Yuxiong He. 2020. Zero: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models. In SC20: International Conference for High Performance Com- puting, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pages 1- 16. IEEE.
  46. Aditya Ramesh, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol, Casey Chu, and Mark Chen. 2022. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents. Preprint, arXiv:2204.06125. · arXiv
  47. Aditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Mark Chen, and Ilya Sutskever. 2021. Zero-shot text-to-image gener- ation. Preprint, arXiv:2102.12092. · arXiv
  48. Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. 2022. High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion mod- els. Preprint, arXiv:2112.10752. · arXiv
  49. Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, and Xi Chen. 2016. Improved techniques for training gans. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29.
  50. Xincheng Shuai, Henghui Ding, Xingjun Ma, Rongcheng Tu, Yu-Gang Jiang, and Dacheng Tao. 2024a. A survey of multimodal-guided image edit- ing with text-to-image diffusion models. CoRR, abs/2406.14555. · DOI
  51. Xincheng Shuai, Henghui Ding, Xingjun Ma, Rongcheng Tu, Yu-Gang Jiang, and Dacheng Tao. 2024b. A survey of multimodal-guided image editing with text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14555. · arXiv
  52. Jaskirat Singh and Liang Zheng. 2023. Divide, evaluate, and refine: Evaluating and improving text-to-image alignment with iterative VQA feedback. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: An- nual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New Orleans, LA, USA, December 10 -16, 2023.
  53. Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. 2022. Denoising diffusion implicit models. Preprint, arXiv:2010.02502. · arXiv
  54. Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Daniel M. Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul Christiano. 2022. Learn- ing to summarize from human feedback. Preprint, arXiv:2009.01325. · arXiv
  55. Shichao Sun, Junlong Li, Weizhe Yuan, Ruifeng Yuan, Wenjie Li, and Pengfei Liu. 2024a. The critique of critique. Preprint, arXiv:2401.04518. · arXiv
  56. Wenhao Sun, Rong-Cheng Tu, Jingyi Liao, and Dacheng Tao. 2024b. Diffusion model-based video editing: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07111. · arXiv
  57. Zhiyu Tan, Xiaomeng Yang, Luozheng Qin, Mengping Yang, Cheng Zhang, and Hao Li. 2024. Evalalign: Supervised fine-tuning multimodal llms with human- aligned data for evaluating text-to-image models. Preprint, arXiv:2406.16562. · arXiv
  58. Rong-Cheng Tu, Wenhao Sun, Zhao Jin, Jingyi Liao, Jiaxing Huang, and Dacheng Tao. 2024. Spagent: Adaptive task decomposition and model selection for general video generation and editing. CoRR, abs/2411.18983. · DOI
  59. Rongcheng Tu, Zhao Jin, Jingyi Liao, Xiao Luo, Yingjie Wang, Li Shen, and Dacheng Tao. 2025a. Mllm-guided vlm fine-tuning with joint inference for zero-shot composed image retrieval. CoRR, abs/2505.19707. · DOI
  60. Rongcheng Tu, Wenhao Sun, Hanzhe You, Yingjie Wang, Jiaxing Huang, Li Shen, and Dacheng Tao. 2025b. Multimodal reasoning agent for zero-shot composed image retrieval. CoRR, abs/2505.19952. · DOI
  61. Yixin Wan, Arjun Subramonian, Anaelia Ovalle, Zongyu Lin, Ashima Suvarna, Christina Chance, Hri- tik Bansal, Rebecca Pattichis, and Kai-Wei Chang. 2024. Survey of bias in text-to-image generation: Definition, evaluation, and mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01030. · arXiv
  62. Peng Wang, Shuai Bai, Sinan Tan, Shijie Wang, Zhi- hao Fan, Jinze Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Yang Fan, Kai Dang, Mengfei Du, Xuancheng Ren, Rui Men, Dayiheng Liu, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou, and Junyang Lin. 2024. Qwen2-vl: Enhancing vision-language model's per- ception of the world at any resolution. Preprint, arXiv:2409.12191. · arXiv
  63. Olivia Wiles, Chuhan Zhang, Isabela Albuquerque, Ivana Kajić, Su Wang, Emanuele Bugliarello, Ya- sumasa Onoe, Chris Knutsen, Cyrus Rashtchian, Jordi Pont-Tuset, and Aida Nematzadeh. 2024. Re- visiting text-to-image evaluation with gecko: On metrics, prompts, and human ratings. Preprint, arXiv:2404.16820. · arXiv
  64. Shengqiong Wu, Hao Fei, Leigang Qu, Wei Ji, and Tat- Seng Chua. 2024. Next-gpt: Any-to-any multimodal llm. Preprint, arXiv:2309.05519. · arXiv
  65. Xiaoshi Wu, Yiming Hao, Keqiang Sun, Yixiong Chen, Feng Zhu, Rui Zhao, and Hongsheng Li. 2023. Hu- man preference score v2: A solid benchmark for eval- uating human preferences of text-to-image synthesis. Preprint, arXiv:2306.09341. · arXiv
  66. Chen Xu, Tian Lan, Yu Ji, Changlong Yu, Wei Wang, Jun Gao, Qunxi Dong, Kun Qian, Piji Li, Wei Bi, and Bin Hu. 2025. Decider: A dual-system rule- controllable decoding framework for language gen- eration. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, pages 1-14. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Jiazheng Xu, Xiao Liu, Yuchen Wu, Yuxuan Tong, Qinkai Li, Ming Ding, Jie Tang, and Yuxiao Dong. 2023. Imagereward: Learning and evaluating human preferences for text-to-image generation. Preprint, arXiv:2304.05977. · arXiv
  68. Yuan Yao, Tianyu Yu, Ao Zhang, Chongyi Wang, Junbo Cui, Hongji Zhu, Tianchi Cai, Haoyu Li, Weilin Zhao, Zhihui He, et al. 2024. Minicpm-v: A gpt-4v level mllm on your phone. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.01800. · arXiv
  69. Michal Yarom, Yonatan Bitton, Soravit Changpinyo, Roee Aharoni, Jonathan Herzig, Oran Lang, Eran Ofek, and Idan Szpektor. 2023. What you see is what you read? improving text-image alignment evalua- tion. Preprint, arXiv:2305.10400. · arXiv
  70. Peter Young, Alice Lai, Micah Hodosh, and Julia Hock- enmaier. 2014. From image descriptions to visual denotations: New similarity metrics for semantic in- ference over event descriptions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2:67-78. · DOI
  71. Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. 2018. The unreasonable ef- fectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In CVPR.
  72. Yuze Zhao, Jintao Huang, Jinghan Hu, Xingjun Wang, Yunlin Mao, Daoze Zhang, Zeyinzi Jiang, Zhikai Wu, Baole Ai, Ang Wang, Wenmeng Zhou, and Yingda Chen. 2024. Swift:a scalable lightweight infrastruc- ture for fine-tuning. Preprint, arXiv:2408.05517. · arXiv
  73. Ming Zhong, Yang Liu, Da Yin, Yuning Mao, Yizhu Jiao, Pengfei Liu, Chenguang Zhu, Heng Ji, and Jiawei Han. 2022. Towards a unified multi- dimensional evaluator for text generation. Preprint, arXiv:2210.07197. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tu, R.-C., Ma, Z.-A., Lan, T., Zhao, Y., Huang, H., & Mao, X.-L.
Affiliations
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
22340-22361
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412944756
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21B2009, 62276110, 62172039)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
Keywords
text-to-image generation, task decomposition, knowledge distillation, GPT-4o, diffusion models, training dataset construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review