CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 7Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningPsychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience

ARC Prize 2024: Technical Report

Open access
Chollet, Francois, Knoop, Mike, Kamradt, Gregory, Landers, Bryan·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2412.04604arXiv 2412.04604
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

As of December 2024, the ARC-AGI benchmark is five years old and remains unbeaten. We believe it is currently the most important unsolved AI benchmark in the world because it seeks to measure generalization on novel tasks -- the essence of intelligence -- as opposed to skill at tasks that can be prepared for in advance. This year, we launched ARC Prize, a global competition to inspire new ideas and drive open progress towards AGI by reaching a target benchmark score of 85\%. As a result, the state-of-the-art score on the ARC-AGI private evaluation set increased from 33\% to 55.5\%, propelled by several frontier AGI reasoning techniques including deep learning-guided program synthesis and test-time training. In this paper, we survey top approaches, review new open-source implementations, discuss the limitations of the ARC-AGI-1 dataset, and share key insights gained from the competition.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2412.04604

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent history shows benchmarks are quickly saturated, with models progressing from near-zero to near-perfect performance in a short timeframe.

    “recent history shows benchmarks are quickly saturated—with models markedly progressing from near-zero to near-perfect performance in a short timeframe9,10.”

    From A benchmark of expert-level academic questions to assess AI capabilities (2026) · cites this paper as [10]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chollet, F., Knoop, M., Kamradt, G., & Landers, B.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2412.04604
arXiv
2412.04604
OpenAlex
W4405173200
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Keywords
artificial general intelligence, AI benchmarking, program synthesis, test-time training, open-source implementation, AI reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review