The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Anomaly Detection and Classification in Knowledge Graphs
Open accessAbstract
Anomalies such as redundant, inconsistent, contradictory, and deficient values in a Knowledge Graph (KG) are unavoidable, as these graphs are often curated manually, or extracted using machine learning and natural language processing techniques. Therefore, anomaly detection is a task that can enhance the quality of KGs. In this paper, we propose SEKA (SEeking Knowledge graph Anomalies), an unsupervised approach for the detection of abnormal triples and entities in KGs. SEKA can help improve the correctness of a KG whilst retaining its coverage. We propose an adaption of the Path Rank Algorithm (PRA), named the Corroborative Path Rank Algorithm (CPRA), which is an efficient adaptation of PRA that is customized to detect anomalies in KGs. Furthermore, we also present TAXO (TAXOnomy of anomaly types in KGs), a taxonomy of possible anomaly types that can occur in a KG. This taxonomy provides a classification of the anomalies discovered by SEKA with an extensive discussion of possible data quality issues in a KG. We evaluate both approaches using the four real-world KGs YAGO-1, KBpedia, Wikidata, and DSKG to demonstrate the ability of SEKA and TAXO to outperform the baselines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent temporal knowledge-graph-based anomaly-detection efforts provide powerful tools to model and detect changes in time-varying relational data.
“This graph format is closely related to the group of temporal KGs and recent temporal KG-based anomalydetection efforts provide powerful tools to model and detect changes in these time-varying relational data [31], [32], [33].”
From Toward Context-Aware Anomaly Detection for AIOps in Microservices Using Dynamic Knowledge Graphs (2026) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring knowledge poisoning attacks to retrieval-augmented generation
Zhao, T., Chen, J., Ru, Y., Zhu, H., Hu, N., Liu, J., & Lin, Q. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103900 · Cited by 10
Toward Context-Aware Anomaly Detection for AIOps in Microservices Using Dynamic Knowledge Graphs
Moens, P., Steenwinckel, B., Ongenae, F., Volckaert, B., & Hoecke, S. V. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2026.3652304 · Cited by 6
RNA-KG v2.0: an RNA-centered Knowledge Graph with Properties
Cavalleri, E., Perlasca, P., & Mesiti, M. (2025) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaf194 · Cited by 2
Taxonomy of Anomaly Types in Knowledge Graphs
Senaratne, A., Christen, P., Omran, P. G., & Williams, G. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99554-5_28
Self-citationIntegrating Knowledge Graphs with LLMs for University Process Question Answering System
Sia, D. E., Cabrera, A. H., Concio, T. J., Teves, H. J., & Chu, S. B. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-20897-2_56
Metadata
- Authors
- Senaratne, A., Christen, P., Omran, P., & Williams, G.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2412.04780
- OpenAlex
- W4404853956
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- anomaly detection, knowledge graphs, entity classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review