PreprintCited by 5Advanced Graph Neural NetworksAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsSemantic Web and Ontologies

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Anomaly Detection and Classification in Knowledge Graphs

Open access
Senaratne, Asara, Christen, Peter, Omran, Pouya, Williams, Graham·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Anomalies such as redundant, inconsistent, contradictory, and deficient values in a Knowledge Graph (KG) are unavoidable, as these graphs are often curated manually, or extracted using machine learning and natural language processing techniques. Therefore, anomaly detection is a task that can enhance the quality of KGs. In this paper, we propose SEKA (SEeking Knowledge graph Anomalies), an unsupervised approach for the detection of abnormal triples and entities in KGs. SEKA can help improve the correctness of a KG whilst retaining its coverage. We propose an adaption of the Path Rank Algorithm (PRA), named the Corroborative Path Rank Algorithm (CPRA), which is an efficient adaptation of PRA that is customized to detect anomalies in KGs. Furthermore, we also present TAXO (TAXOnomy of anomaly types in KGs), a taxonomy of possible anomaly types that can occur in a KG. This taxonomy provides a classification of the anomalies discovered by SEKA with an extensive discussion of possible data quality issues in a KG. We evaluate both approaches using the four real-world KGs YAGO-1, KBpedia, Wikidata, and DSKG to demonstrate the ability of SEKA and TAXO to outperform the baselines.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2412.04780

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent temporal knowledge-graph-based anomaly-detection efforts provide powerful tools to model and detect changes in time-varying relational data.

    “This graph format is closely related to the group of temporal KGs and recent temporal KG-based anomalydetection efforts provide powerful tools to model and detect changes in these time-varying relational data [31], [32], [33].”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Senaratne, A., Christen, P., Omran, P., & Williams, G.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404853956
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
anomaly detection, knowledge graphs, entity classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review