PreprintCited by 38Handwritten Text Recognition TechniquesInformation Systems and Technology ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations

Open access

Abstract

Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations--ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute--based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2412.07626

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On an NVIDIA L20, MiniTriton outperforms PyTorch eager and torch.compile in geometric mean over its core benchmark suite.

    “On an NVIDIA L20, MiniTriton outperforms PyTorch eager [89] and torch.compile[5] in geometric mean over its core benchmark suite.”

    From Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as [89]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ouyang, L., Qu, Y., Zhou, H., Zhu, J., Zhang, R., Lin, Q., Wang, B., Zhao, Z., Jiang, M., Zhao, X., Shi, J., Wu, F., Chu, P., Liu, M., Li, Z., Xu, C., Zhang, B., Shi, B., Tu, Z., & He, C.
Affiliations
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Pages
24838-24848
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413145313
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 3
FWCI
28.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems and Technology Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
benchmark dataset, vision-language models, handwritten notes, academic papers, newspapers, large language models, retrieval-augmented generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review