The DOI matches its DataCite record.
OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations
Open accessAbstract
Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations--ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute--based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On an NVIDIA L20, MiniTriton outperforms PyTorch eager and torch.compile in geometric mean over its core benchmark suite.
“On an NVIDIA L20, MiniTriton outperforms PyTorch eager [89] and torch.compile[5] in geometric mean over its core benchmark suite.”
From Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as [89]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bai, S., Cai, Y., Chen, R., Chen, K., Chen, X., Cheng, Z., Deng, L., Ding, W., Gao, C., Ge, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.21631 · Cited by 27
Self-citationKimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence
Kimi Team, Bai, T., Bai, Y., Bao, Y., Cai, S. H., Cao, Y., Chai, Z., Charles, Y., Che, H. S., Chen, C., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.02276 · Cited by 770
Self-citationKimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence
Kimi Team, Bai, T., Bai, Y., Bao, Y., C., M., Cai, J., Cai, X., Cao, P., Cao, Y., Chai, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.24653
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ouyang, L., Qu, Y., Zhou, H., Zhu, J., Zhang, R., Lin, Q., Wang, B., Zhao, Z., Jiang, M., Zhao, X., Shi, J., Wu, F., Chu, P., Liu, M., Li, Z., Xu, C., Zhang, B., Shi, B., Tu, Z., & He, C.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 24838-24848
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2412.07626
- OpenAlex
- W4413145313
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems and Technology Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- benchmark dataset, vision-language models, handwritten notes, academic papers, newspapers, large language models, retrieval-augmented generation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review