Shaping the Future of Social Media with Middleware
Abstract
Middleware, third-party software intermediaries between users and platforms, has been broached as a means to decentralize the power of social media platforms and enhance user agency. Middleware may enable a more user-centric and democratic approach to shaping digital experiences, offering a flexible architecture as an alternative to both centrally controlled, opaque platforms and an unmoderated, uncurated internet. The widespread adoption of open middleware has long hinged on the cooperation of established major platforms; however, the recent growth of federated platforms, such as Mastodon and Bluesky, has led to increased offerings and user awareness. In this report we consider the potential of middleware as a means of enabling greater user control over curation and moderation - two aspects of the social media experience that are often mired in controversy. We evaluate the trade-offs and negative externalities it might create, and discuss the technological, regulatory, and market dynamics that could either support or hinder its implementation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is currently no viable business model for third-party service providers, although ad-revenue sharing, subscription models, and reverse metering have been proposed.
“At the practical level, there is currently no viable business model for third-party service providers, although ad-revenue sharing arrangements, subscription models, and reverse metering have been proposed (Hogg et al., 2024).”
From Stuck in the middleware with you: the challenges of capitalizing a market-oriented approach to platform governance (2025) · cites this paper as Hogg et al., 2024
The For-Profit Models section proposes ad-revenue sharing, subscriptions, and reverse metering for middleware providers. The Potential Business Models section says finding sustainable models is important, but it does not say that no viable business model currently exists; it also describes Block Party’s former freemium model. The claim’s categorical opening is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBluesky has been described by proponents as a noteworthy and ambitious experiment in using middleware to actively incorporate the user community, increasing their agency over their social environment.
“Bluesky, in particular, has been described by proponents as a “noteworthy and ambitious experiment in using middleware to actively incorporate the user community… increasing their agency over their social environment” (Hogg et al., 2024, p. 16).”
From Stuck in the middleware with you: the challenges of capitalizing a market-oriented approach to platform governance (2025) · cites this paper as Hogg et al., 2024
Scaling middleware solutions requires a viable economic model.
“The situation leads us to agree that scaling middleware solutions requires a viable economic model (Hogg et al., 2024), a point we discuss below.”
From Stuck in the middleware with you: the challenges of capitalizing a market-oriented approach to platform governance (2025) · cites this paper as Hogg et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
- Authors
- Hogg, L., DiResta, R., Fukuyama, F., Reisman, R., Keller, D., Ovadya, A., Thorburn, L., Stray, J., & Mathur, S.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- arXiv
- 2412.10283
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
