CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 18Machine Learning in Materials ScienceArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsFirm Innovation and Growth

Artificial Intelligence, Scientific Discovery, and Product Innovation

Open access
Toner-Rodgers, Aidan·2024·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2412.17866arXiv 2412.17866
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of artificial intelligence on innovation, exploiting the randomized introduction of a new materials discovery technology to 1,018 scientists in the R&D lab of a large U.S. firm. AI-assisted researchers discover 44% more materials, resulting in a 39% increase in patent filings and a 17% rise in downstream product innovation. These compounds possess more novel chemical structures and lead to more radical inventions. However, the technology has strikingly disparate effects across the productivity distribution: while the bottom third of scientists see little benefit, the output of top researchers nearly doubles. Investigating the mechanisms behind these results, I show that AI automates 57% of "idea-generation" tasks, reallocating researchers to the new task of evaluating model-produced candidate materials. Top scientists leverage their domain knowledge to prioritize promising AI suggestions, while others waste significant resources testing false positives. Together, these findings demonstrate the potential of AI-augmented research and highlight the complementarity between algorithms and expertise in the innovative process. Survey evidence reveals that these gains come at a cost, however, as 82% of scientists report reduced satisfaction with their work due to decreased creativity and skill underutilization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2412.17866

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Toner-Rodgers (2024) shows that other generative models have large effects on the scientific discovery process for materials scientists, raising innovative capacity while lowering job satisfaction.

    “Toner-Rodgers (2024) shows that other generative models-specifically those that generate materials designs rather than text-have profound impacts on the scientific discovery process for materials scientists, significantly enhancing their innovative capacity but also reducing their job satisfaction.”

    From Still Waters, Rapid Currents: Early Labor Market Transformation under Generative AI (2025) · cites this paper as Toner-Rodgers (2024)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 87

  1. Abadie, Alberto, Susan Athey, Guido W. Imbens, and Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. 2020. "Sampling-Based versus Design-Based Uncertainty in Regression Analysis." Econometrica 88 (1): 265-296. ↩→ [p.
  2. Abramson, Josh, Jonas Adler, Jack Dunger, Richard Evans, Tim Green, Alexander Pritzel, Olaf Ron- neberger, Lindsay Willmore, Andrew J. Ballard, Joshua Bambrick, Sebastian W. Bodenstein, David A. Evans, Chia-Chun Hung, Michael O'Neill, David Reiman, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Zachary Wu, Akvilė Žemgulytė, Eirini Arvaniti, Charles Beattie, Ottavia Bertolli, Alex Bridgland, Alexey Cherepanov, Miles Congreve, Alexander I. Cowen-Rivers, Andrew Cowie, Michael Figurnov, Fabian B. Fuchs, Hannah Gladman, Rishub Jain, Yousuf A. Khan, Caroline M. R. Low, Kuba Perlin, Anna Potapenko, Pascal Savy, Sukhdeep Singh, Adrian Stecula, Ashok Thillaisundaram, Catherine Tong, Sergei Yakneen, Ellen D. Zhong, Michal Zielinski, Augustin Žídek, Victor Bapst, Pushmeet Kohli, Max Jaderberg, Demis Hassabis, and John M. Jumper. 2024. "Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3." Nature 630 (8016): 493-500. ↩→ [p.
  3. Acemoglu, Daron. 2024. "The Simple Macroeconomics of AI." ↩→ [pp. 5 and 39
  4. Acemoglu, Daron, Ufuk Akcigit, and Murat Alp Celik. 2022a. "Radical and Incremental Innovation: The Roles of Firms, Managers, and Innovators." American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 14 (3): 199-249. ↩→ [p.
  5. Acemoglu, Daron, and David Autor. 2011. "Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings." 1043-1171. ↩→ [pp. 28 and A29]
  6. Acemoglu, Daron, David Autor, Jonathon Hazell, and Pascual Restrepo. 2022b. "Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: Evidence from Online Vacancies." Journal of Labor Economics 40 (S1). ↩→ [p.
  7. Acemoglu, Daron, and Pascual Restrepo. 2019. "The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the Future of Labour Demand." Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 13 (1): 25-35. ↩→ [p.
  8. Acemoglu, Daron, and Pascual Restrepo. 2022. "Tasks, Automation, and the Rise in U.S. Wage Inequality." Econometrica. ↩→ [pp. 4 and 28
  9. Aghion, Philippe, Benjamin Jones, and Charles Jones. 2019. "Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth." The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. ↩→ [pp. 1 and 4
  10. Agrawal, A., J. S. Gans, and A. Goldfarb. 2019. "Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction." Journal of Economic Perspectives 33: 31-50. ↩→ [p.
  11. Agrawal, Ajay, Joshua Gans, and Avi Goldfarb. 2018. Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence.: Harvard Business Review Press. ↩→ [p.
  12. Agrawal, Ajay K., John McHale, and Alexander Oettl. 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Discovery: A Model of Prioritized Search." NBER Working Paper No. 31558. ↩→ [pp. 5, 28, and 29
  13. Alur, Rohan, Loren Laine, Darrick K. Li, Manish Raghavan, Devavrat Shah, and Dennis Shung. 2023. "Auditing for Human Expertise." Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). ↩→ [pp. 5 and 33
  14. Alur, Rohan, Manish Raghavan, and Devavrat Shah. 2024. "Human Expertise in Algorithmic Prediction." ↩→ [pp. 5 and 33
  15. Anderson, Chris. 2008. "The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete." Wired Magazine 16: 16-07. ↩→ [pp. 3, 33, and 39]
  16. Angwin, Julia. 2024. "Press Pause on the Silicon Valley Hype Machine." The New York Times. ↩→ [p.
  17. Arjovsky, Martin, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou. 2017. "Wasserstein GAN." Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR). ↩→ [p.
  18. Aschenbrenner, Leopold. 2024. "Situational Awareness: The Decade Ahead." ↩→ [pp. 5 and 39
  19. Athey, Susan, and Scott Stern. 2002. "The Impact of Information Technology on Emergency Health Care Outcomes." RAND Journal of Economics 33 (3): 399-432. ↩→ [p.
  20. Autor, David. 2015. "Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation." Journal of Economic Perspectives 29: 3-30. ↩→ [p.
  21. Autor, David, Caroline Chin, Anna Salomon, and Bryan Seegmiller. 2024. "New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940-2018." Quarterly Journal of Economics. ↩→ [p.
  22. Autor, David H., Frank Levy, and Richard J. Murnane. 2003. "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1279-1333. ↩→ [p.
  23. Autor, David, Lawrence F. Katz, and Alan B. Krueger. 1998. "Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market?" The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (4): 1169-1213. ↩→ [p.
  24. Autor, David, David A. Mindell, and Elisabeth B. Reynolds. 2023. The Work of the Future: Building Better Jobs in an Age of Intelligent Machines.: The MIT Press. ↩→ [p.
  25. Babina, Tania, Anastassia Fedyk, Alex He, and James Hodson. 2024. "Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation." Journal of Financial Economics 151: 103745. ↩→ [p.
  26. Bloom, Nicholas, Luis Garicano, Raffaella Sadun, and John Van Reenen. 2014. "The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization." Management Science 60 (12): 2859-2885. ↩→ [p.
  27. Borusyak, Kirill, Xavier Jaravel, and Jann Spiess. 2024. "Revisiting Event Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation." Review of Economic Studies. ↩→ [pp. 15 and A11]
  28. Bostock, J. 2022. "A Confused Chemist's Review of AlphaFold 2." ↩→ [p.
  29. Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.: Oxford University Press. ↩→ [p.
  30. Bresnahan, Timothy F., Erik Brynjolfsson, and Lorin M. Hitt. 2002. "Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (1): 339-376. ↩→ [p.
  31. Brynjolfsson, Erik, Danielle Li, and Lindsey Raymond. 2023. "Generative AI at Work." ↩→ [pp. 5 and 23
  32. Budish, Eric, Benjamin N. Roin, and Heidi Williams. 2015. "Do Firms Underinvest in Long-Term Research? Evidence from Cancer Clinical Trials." American Economic Review 105 (7): 2044-85. ↩→ [p.
  33. Callaway, Brantly, and Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna. 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods." Journal of Econometrics 225 (2): 200-230. ↩→ [pp. 15 and A11]
  34. Card, David, Alexandre Mas, Enrico Moretti, and Emmanuel Saez. 2012. "Inequality at Work: The Effect of Peer Salaries on Job Satisfaction." American Economic Review 102 (6): 2981-3003. ↩→ [p.
  35. Caudai, Claudia, Antonella Galizia, Filippo Geraci, Loredana Le Pera, Veronica Morea, Emanuele Salerno, Allegra Via, and Teresa Colombo. 2021. "AI applications in functional genomics." Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19: 5762-5790. ↩→ [p.
  36. de Chaisemartin, Clément, and Xavier D'Haultfœuille. 2020. "Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects." American Economic Review 110 (9): 2964-96. ↩→ [pp. 15 and A11]
  37. Cheetham, Anthony K., and Ram Seshadri. 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Driving Materials Discovery? Perspective on the Article: Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery." Chemistry of Materials 36 (8): 3490-3495. ↩→ [p.
  38. Cheng, Lingwei, and Alexandra Chouldechova. 2022. "Heterogeneity in Algorithm-Assisted Decision- Making: A Case Study in Child Abuse Hotline Screening." Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 (CSCW2). ↩→ [p.
  39. Chetty, Raj, John N. Friedman, and Jonah E. Rockoff. 2014. "Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood." American Economic Review 104 (9). ↩→ [p.
  40. Chouldechova, Alexandra, Diana Benavides-Prado, Oleksandr Fialko, and Rhema Vaithianathan. 2018. "A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions." Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (PMLR) 81: 134-148. ↩→ [p.
  41. Cockburn, Iain M, Rebecca Henderson, and Scott Stern. 2019. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Innovation: An Exploratory Analysis." The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. ↩→ [pp. 1 and 5
  42. Daugherty, Paul R., and H. James Wilson. 2018. Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. ↩→ [p.
  43. De, Sandip, Albert P. Bartók, Gábor Csányi, and Michele Ceriotti. 2016. "Comparing molecules and solids across structural and alchemical space." Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 18: 13754-13769. ↩→ [pp. 2, 11, 21, A2, A19, and A20]
  44. Donahue, Kate, Alexandra Chouldechova, and Krishnaram Kenthapadi. 2022. "Human-Algorithm Collab- oration: Achieving Complementarity and Avoiding Unfairness." Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ↩→ [p.
  45. Erdil, Ege, and Tamay Besiroglu. 2023. "Explosive growth from AI automation: A review of the arguments." ↩→ [p.
  46. Garicano, Luis, and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg. 2015. "Knowledge-Based Hierarchies: Using Organizations to Understand the Economy." Annual Review of Economics 7 (1): 1-30. ↩→ [p.
  47. Gennatas, Efstathios, Jerome Friedman, Lyle Ungar, Romain Pirracchio, Eric Eaton, Lara Reichmann, Yannet Interian, José Luna, Charles Simone, Andrew Auerbach, Elier Delgado, Mark van der Laan, Timothy Solberg, and Gilmer Valdes. 2020. "Expert-augmented machine learning." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (9): 4571-4577. ↩→ [pp. 3 and 33
  48. Goodfellow, Ian J., Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. "Generative Adversarial Nets." Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 27: 2672-2680. ↩→ [p.
  49. Grace, Katja, John Salvatier, Allan Dafoe, Baobao Zhang, and Owain Evans. 2018. "When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 62: 729-754. ↩→ [p.
  50. Grace, Katja, Zach Stein-Perlman, Benjamin Weinstein-Raun, and John Salvatier. 2022. "2022 Expert Survey on Progress in AI." ↩→ [pp. 38 and 39
  51. Hill, Ryan, and Carolyn Stein. 2024. "Race to the Bottom: Competition and Quality in Science." ↩→ [pp. 13 and 18
  52. Hoelzemann, Johannes, Gustavo Manso, Abhishek Nagaraj, and Matteo Tranchero. 2024. "The Streetlight Effect in Data-Driven Exploration." ↩→ [pp. 2 and 20
  53. Imbens, Guido, and Donald Rubin. 2015. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences.: Cambridge University Press. ↩→ [pp. 15 and A9]
  54. Jain, Anubhav, Shyue Ping Ong, Geoffroy Hautier, Wei Chen, William Davidson Richards, Stephen Dacek, Shreyas Cholia, Dan Gunter, David Skinner, Gerbrand Ceder, and Kristin Persson. 2013. "The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation." APL Materials 1 (1): 011002. ↩→ [p.
  55. Johnson, Daniel D. 2017. "Learning Graphical State Transitions." International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations (ICLR). ↩→ [p.
  56. Jumper, John, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ronneberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Russ Bates, Augustin Žídek, Anna Potapenko, Alex Bridgland, Clemens Meyer, Simon A. A. Kohl, Andrew J. Ballard, Andrew Cowie, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Stanislav Nikolov, Rishub Jain, Jonas Adler, Trevor Back, Stig Petersen, David Reiman, Ellen Clancy, Michal Zielinski, Martin Steinegger, Michalina Pacholska, Tamas Berghammer, Sebastian Bodenstein, David Silver, Oriol Vinyals, Andrew W. Senior, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Pushmeet Kohli, and Demis Hassabis. 2021. "Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold." Nature 596 (7873): 583-589. ↩→ [p.
  57. Kalyani, Aakash. 2024. "The Creativity Decline: Evidence from US Patents." ↩→ [pp. 2, 12, 21, A20, and A21]
  58. Karras, Tero, Timo Aila, Samuli Laine, and Jaakko Lehtinen. 2018. "Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation." arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10196. ↩→ [p. · arXiv
  59. Kelly, Bryan, Dimitris Papanikolaou, Amit Seru, and Matt Taddy. 2021. "Measuring Technological In- novation over the Long Run." American Economic Review: Insights 3 (3): 303-20. ↩→ [pp. 11, 21, A20, and A21]
  60. Khurana, Mark. 2023. Streetlight Effects: How Does the Streetlight Influence What We Choose to Study?. 23-26: Cambridge University Press. ↩→ [pp. 2 and 20
  61. Kim, Soomi. 2023. "Shortcuts to Innovation: The Use of Analogies in Knowledge Production." ↩→ [pp. 2 and 20
  62. Kipf, Thomas N., and Max Welling. 2017. "Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks." International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). ↩→ [p.
  63. Klein, Gary, Ben Shneiderman, Robert Hoffman, and Kenneth Ford. 2017. "Why Expertise Matters: A Response to the Challenges." IEEE Intelligent Systems 32 (6): 67-73. ↩→ [p.
  64. Kleinberg, Jon, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Jure Leskovec, Jens Ludwig, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2017. "Human Decisions and Machine Predictions." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (1): 237-293. ↩→ [p.
  65. Kline, Patrick, Evan K Rose, and Christopher R Walters. 2022. "Systemic Discrimination Among Large U.S. Employers." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 137 (4): 1963-2036. ↩→ [p.
  66. Krieger, Joshua, Danielle Li, and Dimitris Papanikolaou. 2021. "Missing Novelty in Drug Development." The Review of Financial Studies 35 (2): 636-679. ↩→ [p.
  67. Leitão, Diogo, Pedro Saleiro, Mário AT Figueiredo, and Pedro Bizarro. 2022. "Human-AI Collaboration in Decision-Making: Beyond Learning to Defer." International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). ↩→ [p.
  68. Li, Yujia, Oriol Vinyals, Chris Dyer, Razvan Pascanu, and Peter Battaglia. 2018. "Learning Deep Generative Models of Graphs." International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). ↩→ [p.
  69. Ludwig, Jens, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2024. "Machine Learning as a Tool for Hypothesis Generation." The Quarterly Journal of Economics. ↩→ [p.
  70. Merchant, Amil, Simon Batzner, Samuel S. Schoenholz, Muratahan Aykol, Gowoon Cheon, and Ekin Do- gus Cubuk. 2023. "Scaling deep learning for materials discovery." Nature 624 (7990): 80-85. ↩→ [p.
  71. Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1996. "The LeChatelier Principle." The American Economic Review 86 (1): 173-179. ↩→ [p.
  72. Moskowitz, Sanford. 2022. Advanced Materials Innovation: Managing Global Technology in the 21st Century.: Wiley. ↩→ [p.
  73. Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Ziad Obermeyer. 2022. "Diagnosing Physician Error: A Machine Learning Approach to Low-Value Health Care." Quarterly Journal of Economics 137 (2): 679-727. ↩→ [p.
  74. Mullowney, Michael W., Katherine R. Duncan, Somayah S. Elsayed, Neha Garg, Justin J. J. van der Hooft, Nathaniel I. Martin, David Meijer, Barbara R. Terlouw, Friederike Biermann, Kai Blin, Janani Durairaj, Marina Gorostiola González, Eric J. N. Helfrich, Florian Huber, Stefan Leopold-Messer, Kohulan Rajan, Tristan de Rond, Jeffrey A. van Santen, Maria Sorokina, Marcy J. Balunas, Mehdi A. Beniddir, Doris A. van Bergeijk, Laura M. Carroll, Chase M. Clark, Djork-Arné Clevert, Chris A. Dejong, Chao Du, Scarlet Ferrinho, Francesca Grisoni, Albert Hofstetter, Willem Jespers, Olga V. Kalinina, Satria A. Kautsar, Hyunwoo Kim, Tiago F. Leao, Joleen Masschelein, Evan R. Rees, Raphael Reher, Daniel Reker, Philippe Schwaller, Marwin Segler, Michael A. Skinnider, Allison S. Walker, Egon L. Willighagen, Barbara Zdrazil, Nadine Ziemert, Rebecca J. M. Goss, Pierre Guyomard, Andrea Volkamer, William H. Gerwick, Hyun Uk Kim, Rolf Müller, Gilles P. van Wezel, Gerard J. P. van Westen, Anna K. H. Hirsch, Roger G. Linington, Serina L. Robinson, and Marnix H. Medema. 2023. "Artificial intelligence for natural product drug discovery." Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 22 (11): 895-916. ↩→ [p.
  75. Noy, Shakked, and Whitney Zhang. 2023. "Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence." Science 381 (6654): 187-192. ↩→ [pp. 5 and
  76. Peng, Sida, Eirini Kalliamvakou, Peter Cihon, and Mert Demirer. 2023. "The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot." ↩→ [pp. 5 and 23
  77. Radford, Alec, Luke Metz, and Soumith Chintala. 2016. "Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks." International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). ↩→ [p.
  78. Reiser, Patrick, Marlen Neubert, André Eberhard, Luca Torresi, Chen Zhou, Chen Shao, Houssam Metni, Clint van Hoesel, Henrik Schopmans, Timo Sommer, and Pascal Friederich. 2022. "Graph neural networks for materials science and chemistry." Nature 3 (1). ↩→ [pp. 7 and 8
  79. Samuelson, Paul. 1947. The Foundations of Economic Analysis.: Harvard University Press. ↩→ [p.
  80. Scarselli, Franco, Marco Gori, Ah Chung Tsoi, Markus Hagenbuchner, and Gabriele Monfardini. 2009. "The Graph Neural Network Model." IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 20 (1): 61-80. ↩→ [p.
  81. Schmidt, J., H.C. Wang, T.F. Cerqueira, S. Botti, and M.A. Marques. 2022. "A dataset of 175k stable and metastable materials calculated with the PBEsol and SCAN functionals." Scientific Data 9 (1): 64. ↩→ [p.
  82. Schulman, Carl. 2023. "Intelligence Explosion." ↩→ [pp. 5 and 39
  83. Subramaniam, Sriram. 2024. "Structural biology in the age of AI." Nature Methods 21 (1): 18-19. ↩→ [p.
  84. Sun, Liyang, and Sarah Abraham. 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects." Journal of Econometrics 225 (2): 175-199. ↩→ [pp. 15 and A11]
  85. Tranchero, Matteo. 2023. "Finding Diamonds in the Rough: Data-Driven Opportunities and Pharmaceutical Innovation." ↩→ [pp. 6 and 34
  86. Trinh, Trieu H., Yuhuai Wu, Quoc V. Le, He He, and Thang Luong. 2024. "Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations." Nature 625 (7995): 476-482. ↩→ [p.
  87. Velickovic, Petar, Arantxa Casanova, Pietro Liò, Guillem Cucurull, Adriana Romero, and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. "Graph Attention Networks." International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). ↩→ [p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Toner-Rodgers, A.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2412.17866
arXiv
2412.17866
OpenAlex
W4405783454
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2141064)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
Keywords
artificial intelligence in research, materials discovery, scientific discovery, product innovation, patent applications, researcher productivity, researcher satisfaction, creativity, false positives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review