PreprintCited by 1Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsVideo Analysis and SummarizationGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

MDP3: A training-free approach for list-wise frame selection in video-LLMs

Open access
Sun, Hui, Lu, Shiyin, Wang, Huanyu, Chen, Qing-Guo, Xu, Zhao, Luo, Weihua, Zhang, Kaifu, Li, Ming·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Video large language models (Video-LLMs) have made significant progress in understanding videos. However, processing multiple frames leads to lengthy visual token sequences, presenting challenges such as the limited context length cannot accommodate the entire video, and the inclusion of irrelevant frames hinders visual perception. Hence, effective frame selection is crucial. This paper emphasizes that frame selection should follow three key principles: query relevance, list-wise diversity, and sequentiality. Existing methods, such as uniform frame sampling and query-frame matching, do not capture all of these principles. Thus, we propose Markov decision determinantal point process with dynamic programming (MDP3) for frame selection, a training-free and model-agnostic method that can be seamlessly integrated into existing Video-LLMs. Our method first estimates frame similarities conditioned on the query using a conditional Gaussian kernel within the reproducing kernel Hilbert space~(RKHS). We then apply the determinantal point process~(DPP) to the similarity matrix to capture both query relevance and list-wise diversity. To incorporate sequentiality, we segment the video and apply DPP within each segment, conditioned on the preceding segment selection, modeled as a Markov decision process~(MDP) for allocating selection sizes across segments. Theoretically, MDP3 provides a \((1 - 1/e)\)-approximate solution to the NP-hard list-wise frame selection problem with pseudo-polynomial time complexity, demonstrating its efficiency. Empirically, MDP3 significantly outperforms existing methods, verifying its effectiveness and robustness.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2501.02885

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A greedy algorithm provides a solution within polynomial time and guarantees a near-optimal approximation for submodular maximization.

    “It provides a solution within polynomial time and guarantees a near-optimal approximation, as detailed in the following theorem [29], [30]:”
  • A greedy algorithm that iteratively maximizes the marginal gain offers a theoretical (1 - 1/e)-approximate solution in polynomial time for maximizing a non-negative, monotone, and submodular function.

    “Although generally NP-hard, a greedy algorithm that iteratively maximizes the marginal gain offers a theoretical (1 -1 /e ) -approximate solution in polynomial time.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, H., Lu, S., Wang, H., Chen, Q.-G., Xu, Z., Luo, W., Zhang, K., & Li, M.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University (CN)
  • Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406122958
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (62076121)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
video large language models, frame selection, determinantal point processes, Markov decision process, training-free methods, query relevance, video segmentation, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, Gaussian kernel, dynamic programming, approximate solutions, video summarization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review