MDP3: A training-free approach for list-wise frame selection in video-LLMs
Open accessAbstract
Video large language models (Video-LLMs) have made significant progress in understanding videos. However, processing multiple frames leads to lengthy visual token sequences, presenting challenges such as the limited context length cannot accommodate the entire video, and the inclusion of irrelevant frames hinders visual perception. Hence, effective frame selection is crucial. This paper emphasizes that frame selection should follow three key principles: query relevance, list-wise diversity, and sequentiality. Existing methods, such as uniform frame sampling and query-frame matching, do not capture all of these principles. Thus, we propose Markov decision determinantal point process with dynamic programming (MDP3) for frame selection, a training-free and model-agnostic method that can be seamlessly integrated into existing Video-LLMs. Our method first estimates frame similarities conditioned on the query using a conditional Gaussian kernel within the reproducing kernel Hilbert space~(RKHS). We then apply the determinantal point process~(DPP) to the similarity matrix to capture both query relevance and list-wise diversity. To incorporate sequentiality, we segment the video and apply DPP within each segment, conditioned on the preceding segment selection, modeled as a Markov decision process~(MDP) for allocating selection sizes across segments. Theoretically, MDP3 provides a \((1 - 1/e)\)-approximate solution to the NP-hard list-wise frame selection problem with pseudo-polynomial time complexity, demonstrating its efficiency. Empirically, MDP3 significantly outperforms existing methods, verifying its effectiveness and robustness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A greedy algorithm provides a solution within polynomial time and guarantees a near-optimal approximation for submodular maximization.
“It provides a solution within polynomial time and guarantees a near-optimal approximation, as detailed in the following theorem [29], [30]:”
From Post-Incorporating Code Structural Knowledge Into Pretrained Models via ICL for Code Translation (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
A greedy algorithm that iteratively maximizes the marginal gain offers a theoretical (1 - 1/e)-approximate solution in polynomial time for maximizing a non-negative, monotone, and submodular function.
“Although generally NP-hard, a greedy algorithm that iteratively maximizes the marginal gain offers a theoretical (1 -1 /e ) -approximate solution in polynomial time.”
From Post-Incorporating Code Structural Knowledge Into Pretrained Models via ICL for Code Translation (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Post-Incorporating Code Structural Knowledge Into Pretrained Models via ICL for Code Translation
Du, Y., Sun, H., & Li, M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2025.3605768
Self-citation
- Authors
- Sun, H., Lu, S., Wang, H., Chen, Q.-G., Xu, Z., Luo, W., Zhang, K., & Li, M.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing University (CN)
- Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2501.02885
- OpenAlex
- W4406122958
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62076121)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- video large language models, frame selection, determinantal point processes, Markov decision process, training-free methods, query relevance, video segmentation, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, Gaussian kernel, dynamic programming, approximate solutions, video summarization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review