The DOI matches its DataCite record.
An Empirical Study of Autoregressive Pre-training from Videos
Open accessAbstract
We empirically study autoregressive pre-training from videos. To perform our study, we construct a series of autoregressive video models, called Toto. We treat videos as sequences of visual tokens and train transformer models to autoregressively predict future tokens. Our models are pre-trained on a diverse dataset of videos and images comprising over 1 trillion visual tokens. We explore different architectural, training, and inference design choices. We evaluate the learned visual representations on a range of downstream tasks including image recognition, video classification, object tracking, and robotics. Our results demonstrate that, despite minimal inductive biases, autoregressive pre-training leads to competitive performance across all benchmarks. Finally, we find that scaling our video models results in similar scaling curves to those seen in language models, albeit with a different rate. More details at https://brjathu.github.io/toto/
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The best features for downstream tasks are not necessarily obtained from the last layer of a VLM.
“Recently, (El-Nouby et al., 2024; Bolya et al., 2025; Rajasegaran et al., 2025) have shown that the best features for downstream tasks are not necessarily obtained from the last layer of a VLM.”
From SmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Robotics (2025) · cites this paper as Rajasegaran et al., 2025
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning
Assran, M., Bardes, A., Fan, D., Garrido, Q., Howes, R., Mojtaba, Komeili, Muckley, M., Rizvi, A., Roberts, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.09985 · Cited by 8
“Other works have explored the integration of generative modeling into policy learning (Du et al., 2024; Wu et al., 2023a; Zhao et al., 2025; Zhu et al., 2025; Du et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2025; Rajasegaran et al., 2025).”
SmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Robotics
Shukor, M., Aubakirova, D., Capuano, F., Kooijmans, P., Palma, S., Zouitine, A., Aractingi, M., Pascal, C., Russi, M., Marafioti, A., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01844 · Cited by 695
“Recently, (El-Nouby et al., 2024; Bolya et al., 2025; Rajasegaran et al., 2025) have shown that the best features for downstream tasks are not necessarily obtained from the last layer of a VLM.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Rajasegaran, J., Radosavovic, I., Ravishankar, R., Gandelsman, Y., Feichtenhofer, C., & Malik, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- Pages
- 19108-19118
- arXiv
- 2501.05453
- OpenAlex
- W4406273434
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- video models, visual tokens, transformer models, Toto, visual representation learning, image recognition, video classification, object tracking, robotics, model scaling, inductive bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review