Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents
Open accessAbstract
The rapid deployment of autonomous AI agents creates urgent challenges around authorization, accountability, and access control in digital spaces. New standards are needed to know whom AI agents act on behalf of and guide their use appropriately, protecting online spaces while unlocking the value of task delegation to autonomous agents. We introduce a novel framework for authenticated, authorized, and auditable delegation of authority to AI agents, where human users can securely delegate and restrict the permissions and scope of agents while maintaining clear chains of accountability. This framework builds on existing identification and access management protocols, extending OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect with agent-specific credentials and metadata, maintaining compatibility with established authentication and web infrastructure. Further, we propose a framework for translating flexible, natural language permissions into auditable access control configurations, enabling robust scoping of AI agent capabilities across diverse interaction modalities. Taken together, this practical approach facilitates immediate deployment of AI agents while addressing key security and accountability concerns, working toward ensuring agentic AI systems perform only appropriate actions and providing a tool for digital service providers to enable AI agent interactions without risking harm from scalable interaction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
South et al. extend OAuth 2.0 for agent delegation but do not address intent or compliance.
“South et al. [19] extend OAuth 2.0 for agent delegation but do not address intent or compliance.”
From SentinelAgent: Intent-Verified Delegation Chains for Securing Federal Multi-Agent AI Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents separates agent and user identity in delegated action chains.
“Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents separates agent and user identity in delegated action chains [24].”
From Authorization for Self-Modifying AI Agent Populations: Conserving Authority across Replacement, Forking, and Rollback (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Open Challenges in Multi-Agent Security: Towards Secure Systems of Interacting AI Agents
de Witt, C. S., Krawiecka, K., Krawczuk, I., Hagag, B., Anderson, W. L., Belcak, P., Bucknall, B., Cai, X., Chopra, A., Cohen, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.02077 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Coupling this with a zero-trust model - where every inter-agent request must be authenticated (South et al., 2025), authorized, and encrypted - ensures that compromised agents cannot freely communicate with high-value targets (Rose et al., 2020).”
Reinterpreting agency theory in the era of artificial intelligence: conceptualizing delegated agency
Helal, M. Y. I., Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., & Chae, I. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03034-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
SentinelAgent: Intent-Verified Delegation Chains for Securing Federal Multi-Agent AI Systems
Patil, K. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.02767
“South et al. [19] handle authentication but not intent or compliance.”
InfluentialZhu, G., & Wang, C. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.00347
- Authors
- South, T., Marro, S., Hardjono, T., Mahari, R., Whitney, C. D., Greenwood, D., Chan, A., & Pentland, A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2501.09674
- OpenAlex
- W4406549441
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Keywords
- AI agents, delegation, access control, authentication, OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, accountability, authorization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review