The DOI matches its DataCite record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deploying Privacy Guardrails for LLMs: A Comparative Analysis of Real-World Applications
Open accessAbstract
The adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized AI applications but poses significant challenges in safeguarding user privacy. Ensuring compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR and CCPA while addressing nuanced privacy risks requires robust and scalable frameworks. This paper presents a detailed study of OneShield Privacy Guard, a framework designed to mitigate privacy risks in user inputs and LLM outputs across enterprise and open-source settings. We analyze two real-world deployments:(1) a multilingual privacy-preserving system integrated with Data and Model Factory, focusing on enterprise-scale data governance; and (2) PR Insights, an open-source repository emphasizing automated triaging and community-driven refinements. In Deployment 1, OneShield achieved a 0.95 F1 score in detecting sensitive entities like dates, names, and phone numbers across 26 languages, outperforming state-of-the-art tool such as StarPII and Presidio by up to 12\%. Deployment 2, with an average F1 score of 0.86, reduced manual effort by over 300 hours in three months, accurately flagging 8.25\% of 1,256 pull requests for privacy risks with enhanced context sensitivity. These results demonstrate OneShield's adaptability and efficacy in diverse environments, offering actionable insights for context-aware entity recognition, automated compliance, and ethical AI adoption. This work advances privacy-preserving frameworks, supporting user trust and compliance across operational contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Carlini, N.; Tramer, F.; Wallace, E.; Jagielski, M.; Herbert- Voss, A.; Lee, K.; Roberts, A.; Brown, T.; Song, D.; Erlings- son, U.; et al. 2021. Extracting training data from large language models. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 21), 2633-2650.
- Smith, J. R.; Saint-Amand, H.; Plamada, M.; Koehn, P.; Callison-Burch, C.; and Lopez, A. 2013. Dirt cheap web- scale parallel text from the common crawl. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Users' Privacy Perceptions Towards LLM's RAG-based Memory
Zhang, S., Ma, R., Ma, Y., Li, S., Xu, Y., Yi, X., & Li, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Workshop on Human-Centered AI Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/3733816.3760750 · Cited by 6
Dependability Assurance with Symbolic Reasoning in LLM-Enabled Systems
Deé-Lukács, A. G., & Földvári, A. (2025) · International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks workshops · doi:10.1109/dsn-w65791.2025.00038 · Cited by 2
The Effectiveness of Personal Data Detection in LLM-Based Conversational Agents
Paracuellos, D., Such, J. M., del Val, E., & García‐Fornes, A. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19770-2_9
Романків, Н. Д., & Ситніков, Д. Е. (2026) · Advances in Knowledge-Based Systems Data Science and Cybersecurity · doi:10.54364/cybersecurityjournal.2026.3121
Psallidas, M., & Kalloniatis, C. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-35586-7_29
Metadata
- Authors
- Asthana, S., Zhang, B., Mahindru, R., DeLuca, C., Gentile, A. L., & Gopisetty, S.
- Affiliations
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2501.12456
- OpenAlex
- W4406755937
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- large language models, GDPR compliance, California Consumer Privacy Act, data governance, privacy-preserving AI, ethical AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review