CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 12Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Goku: Flow Based Video Generative Foundation Models

Open access
Chen, Shoufa, Ge, Chongjian, Zhang, Yuqi, Zhang, Yida, Zhu, Fengda, Yang, Hao, Hao, Hongxiang, Wu, Hui +14 more·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2502.04896arXiv 2502.04896
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper introduces Goku, a state-of-the-art family of joint image-and-video generation models leveraging rectified flow Transformers to achieve industry-leading performance. We detail the foundational elements enabling high-quality visual generation, including the data curation pipeline, model architecture design, flow formulation, and advanced infrastructure for efficient and robust large-scale training. The Goku models demonstrate superior performance in both qualitative and quantitative evaluations, setting new benchmarks across major tasks. Specifically, Goku achieves 0.76 on GenEval and 83.65 on DPG-Bench for text-to-image generation, and 84.85 on VBench for text-to-video tasks. We believe that this work provides valuable insights and practical advancements for the research community in developing joint image-and-video generation models.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2502.04896

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing video foundation models such as SoRA, Pika, Luma, Hailuo, and Kling primarily generate characters with limited speech capabilities, simplified mouth movements, and emotional expressions detached from meaningful dialogue, lacking control over spoken content.

    “Despite significant advancements in visually compelling content and dynamic environments, models such as SoRA, Pika, Luma, Hailuo, and Kling [2, 3, 5-7, 19, 27, 42] primarily generate characters with limited speech capabilities. Typically, these models exhibit simplified mouth movements and emotional expressions detached from meaningful dialogue, lacking control over actual spoken content.”

    From MoCha: Towards Movie-Grade Talking Character Synthesis (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Chen, S., Ge, C., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhu, F., Yang, H., Hao, H., Wu, H., Lai, Z., Hu, Y., Lin, T.-C., Zhang, S., Li, F., Li, C., Wang, X., Peng, Y., Sun, P., Luo, P., Jiang, Y., Yuan, Z., Peng, B., & Liu, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • ByteDance (China) (CN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Pages
23516-23527
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2502.04896
arXiv
2502.04896
OpenAlex
W4413147290
Cited by
11
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5
FWCI
8.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
flow-based generative models, text-to-video generation, text-to-image generation, video generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review