CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1Topic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

The Mirage of Model Editing: Revisiting Evaluation in the Wild

Open access
Yang, Wanli, Sun, Fei, Tan, Jiajun, Ma, Xinyu, Cao, Qi, Yin, Dawei, Shen, Huawei, Cheng, Xueqi·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2502.11177arXiv 2502.11177
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Despite near-perfect results reported in the literature, the effectiveness of model editing in real-world applications remains unclear. To bridge this gap, we introduce QAEdit, a new benchmark aligned with widely used question answering (QA) datasets, and WILD, a task-agnostic evaluation framework designed to better reflect real-world usage of model editing. Our single editing experiments show that current editing methods perform substantially worse than previously reported (38.5% vs. 96.8%). We demonstrate that it stems from issues in the synthetic evaluation practices of prior work. Among them, the most severe is the use of teacher forcing during testing, which leaks both content and length of the ground truth, leading to overestimated performance. Furthermore, we simulate practical deployment by sequential editing, revealing that current approaches fail drastically with only 1000 edits. This work calls for a shift in model editing research toward rigorous evaluation and the development of robust, scalable methods that can reliably update knowledge in LLMs for real-world use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2502.11177

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Canyu Chen, Baixiang Huang, Zekun Li, Zhaorun Chen, Shiyang Lai, Xiongxiao Xu, Jia-Chen Gu, Jindong Gu, Huaxiu Yao, Chaowei Xiao, Xifeng Yan, William Yang Wang, Philip Torr, Dawn Song, and Kai Shu. 2024a. Can editing llms inject harm? Preprint , arXiv:2407.20224. · arXiv
  2. Ruizhe Chen, Yichen Li, Zikai Xiao, and Zuozhu Liu. 2024b. Large language model bias mitigation from the perspective of knowledge editing. In ICLR 2024 Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Large Language Models .
  3. Damai Dai, Li Dong, Yaru Hao, Zhifang Sui, Baobao Chang, and Furu Wei. 2022. Knowledge neurons in pretrained transformers. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 8493-8502, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. Nicola De Cao, Wilker Aziz, and Ivan Titov. 2021. Editing factual knowledge in language models. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 64916506, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  5. Qingxiu Dong, Damai Dai, Yifan Song, Jingjing Xu, Zhifang Sui, and Lei Li. 2022. Calibrating factual knowledge in pretrained language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 , pages 5937-5947, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  6. Junfeng Fang, Houcheng Jiang, Kun Wang, Yunshan Ma, Jie Shi, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, and TatSeng Chua. 2025. Alphaedit: Null-space constrained model editing for language models. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations .
  7. Mor Geva, Avi Caciularu, Kevin Wang, and Yoav Goldberg. 2022. Transformer feed-forward layers build predictions by promoting concepts in the vocabulary space. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 30-45, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  8. Mor Geva, Roei Schuster, Jonathan Berant, and Omer Levy. 2021. Transformer feed-forward layers are keyvalue memories. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 5484-5495, Online and Punta Cana,
  9. Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, and et al. 2024. The llama 3 herd of models. Preprint , arXiv:2407.21783. · arXiv
  10. Jia-Chen Gu, Hao-Xiang Xu, Jun-Yu Ma, Pan Lu, ZhenHua Ling, Kai-Wei Chang, and Nanyun Peng. 2024. Model editing harms general abilities of large language models: Regularization to the rescue. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 1680116819, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  11. Akshat Gupta, Sidharth Baskaran, and Gopala Anumanchipalli. 2024a. Rebuilding ROME : Resolving model collapse during sequential model editing. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 21738-21744, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  12. Akshat Gupta, Anurag Rao, and Gopala Anumanchipalli. 2024b. Model editing at scale leads to gradual and catastrophic forgetting. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024 , pages 15202-15232, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  13. Akshat Gupta, Dev Sajnani, and Gopala Anumanchipalli. 2024c. A unified framework for model editing. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages 1540315418, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  14. Zeyu Han, Chao Gao, Jinyang Liu, Jeff Zhang, and Sai Qian Zhang. 2024. Parameter-efficient finetuning for large models: A comprehensive survey. Transactions on Machine Learning Research .
  15. Thomas Hartvigsen, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Hamid Palangi, Yoon Kim, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. 2023. Aging with GRACE: Lifelong model editing with discrete key-value adaptors. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems .
  16. Jason Hoelscher-Obermaier, Julia Persson, Esben Kran, Ioannis Konstas, and Fazl Barez. 2023. Detecting edit failures in large language models: An improved specificity benchmark. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 , pages 11548-11559, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  17. Baixiang Huang, Canyu Chen, Xiongxiao Xu, Ali Payani, and Kai Shu. 2025. Can knowledge editing really correct hallucinations? In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations .
  18. Albert Q. Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, and et al. 2023. Mistral 7b. Preprint , arXiv:2310.06825. · arXiv
  19. Mandar Joshi, Eunsol Choi, Daniel Weld, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2017. TriviaQA: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 1601-1611, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  20. Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, and et al. 2019. Natural questions: A benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 7:452-466.
  21. Dawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi, Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Yuxuan Jiang, Canyu Chen, Tianhao Wu, et al. 2024a. From generation to judgment: Opportunities and challenges of llm-as-a-judge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16594 . · arXiv
  22. Xiaopeng Li, Shasha Li, Shezheng Song, Jing Yang, Jun Ma, and Jie Yu. 2024b. Pmet: precise model editing in a transformer. In Proceedings of the ThirtyEighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence , AAAI'24/IAAI'24/EAAI'24. AAAI Press.
  23. Zhoubo Li, Ningyu Zhang, Yunzhi Yao, Mengru Wang, Xi Chen, and Huajun Chen. 2024c. Unveiling the pitfalls of knowledge editing for large language models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations .
  24. Jun-Yu Ma, Hong Wang, Hao-Xiang Xu, ZhenHua Ling, and Jia-Chen Gu. 2025. Perturbationrestrained sequential model editing. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations .
  25. Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex J Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. 2022. Locating and editing factual associations in GPT. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems .
  26. Kevin Meng, Arnab Sen Sharma, Alex J Andonian, Yonatan Belinkov, and David Bau. 2023. Massediting memory in a transformer. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations .
  27. Eric Mitchell, Charles Lin, Antoine Bosselut, Chelsea Finn, and Christopher D Manning. 2022. Fast model editing at scale. In International Conference on Learning Representations .
  28. Tsung-Hsuan Pan, Chung-Chi Chen, Hen-Hsen Huang, and Hsin-Hsi Chen. 2024. 'why' has the least side effect on model editing. Preprint , arXiv:2409.18679. · arXiv
  29. Chenmien Tan, Ge Zhang, and Jie Fu. 2024. Massive editing for large language models via meta learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations .
  30. Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, and et al. 2023. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. Preprint , arXiv:2307.09288. · arXiv
  31. Haoyu Wang, Tianci Liu, Ruirui Li, Monica Xiao Cheng, Tuo Zhao, and Jing Gao. 2024a. RoseLoRA: Row and column-wise sparse low-rank adaptation of pre-trained language model for knowledge editing and fine-tuning. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 996-1008, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  32. Peng Wang, Zexi Li, Ningyu Zhang, Ziwen Xu, Yunzhi Yao, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, and Huajun Chen. 2024b. WISE: Rethinking the knowledge memory for lifelong model editing of large language models. In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems .
  33. Peng Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Bozhong Tian, and et al. 2024c. EasyEdit: An easy-to-use knowledge editing framework for large language models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations) , pages 82-93, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  34. Song Wang, Yaochen Zhu, Haochen Liu, Zaiyi Zheng, Chen Chen, and Jundong Li. 2024d. Knowledge editing for large language models: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys , 57(3):1-37.
  35. Jason Wei, Nguyen Karina, Hyung Won Chung, Yunxin Joy Jiao, Spencer Papay, Amelia Glaese, John Schulman, and William Fedus. 2024. Measuring short-form factuality in large language models. Preprint , arXiv:2411.04368. · arXiv
  36. Xiaobao Wu, Liangming Pan, William Yang Wang, and Anh Tuan Luu. 2024. AKEW: Assessing knowledge editing in the wild. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 15118-15133, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  37. Xinwei Wu, Junzhuo Li, Minghui Xu, Weilong Dong, Shuangzhi Wu, Chao Bian, and Deyi Xiong. 2023. DEPN: Detecting and editing privacy neurons in pretrained language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 2875-2886, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  38. Wanli Yang, Fei Sun, Xinyu Ma, Xun Liu, Dawei Yin, and Xueqi Cheng. 2024a. The butterfly effect of model editing: Few edits can trigger large language models collapse. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024 , pages 54195437, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  39. Wanli Yang, Fei Sun, Jiajun Tan, Xinyu Ma, Du Su, Dawei Yin, and Huawei Shen. 2024b. The fall of ROME: Understanding the collapse of LLMs in model editing. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages 4079-4087, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  40. Yunzhi Yao, Peng Wang, Bozhong Tian, Siyuan Cheng, Zhoubo Li, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen, and Ningyu Zhang. 2023. Editing large language models: Problems, methods, and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 10222-10240, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  41. Lang Yu, Qin Chen, Jie Zhou, and Liang He. 2024. Melo: enhancing model editing with neuron-indexed dynamic lora. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and ThirtySixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence , AAAI'24/IAAI'24/EAAI'24. AAAI Press.
  42. Ningyu Zhang, Yunzhi Yao, Bozhong Tian, and et al. 2024. A comprehensive study of knowledge editing for large language models. Preprint , arXiv:2401.01286. · arXiv
  43. Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2020. Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert. In International Conference on Learning Representations .
  44. Ce Zheng, Lei Li, Qingxiu Dong, Yuxuan Fan, Zhiyong Wu, Jingjing Xu, and Baobao Chang. 2023. Can we edit factual knowledge by in-context learning? In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 4862-4876, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  45. Chen Zhu, Ankit Singh Rawat, Manzil Zaheer, Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Daliang Li, Felix Yu, and Sanjiv Kumar. 2020. Modifying memories in transformer models. Preprint , arXiv:2012.00363. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, W., Sun, F., Tan, J., Ma, X., Cao, Q., Yin, D., Shen, H., & Cheng, X.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2502.11177
arXiv
2502.11177
OpenAlex
W4407690400
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
model editing, large language models, evaluation benchmark, teacher forcing, synthetic evaluation, knowledge updating, question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review