Hi Robot: Open-Ended Instruction Following with Hierarchical Vision-Language-Action Models
Open accessAbstract
Generalist robots that can perform a range of different tasks in open-world settings must be able to not only reason about the steps needed to accomplish their goals, but also process complex instructions, prompts, and even feedback during task execution. Intricate instructions (e.g., "Could you make me a vegetarian sandwich?" or "I don't like that one") require not just the ability to physically perform the individual steps, but the ability to situate complex commands and feedback in the physical world. In this work, we describe a system that uses vision-language models in a hierarchical structure, first reasoning over complex prompts and user feedback to deduce the most appropriate next step to fulfill the task, and then performing that step with low-level actions. In contrast to direct instruction following methods that can fulfill simple commands ("pick up the cup"), our system can reason through complex prompts and incorporate situated feedback during task execution ("that's not trash"). We evaluate our system across three robotic platforms, including single-arm, dual-arm, and dual-arm mobile robots, demonstrating its ability to handle tasks such as cleaning messy tables, making sandwiches, and grocery shopping. Videos are available at https://www.pi.website/research/hirobot
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hierarchical policy representations that separate high-level language-driven planning from low-level action execution improve task and decomposition.
“These hierarchical architectures improve task and decomposition.”
From Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoning (2025) · cites this paper as Shi et al., 2025
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoning
NVIDIA, :, Azzolini, A., Bai, J., Brandon, H., Cao, J., Chattopadhyay, P., Chen, H., Chu, J., Cui, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.15558 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationEmbodied Intelligence Unlocks Autonomous MicroscopyPreprint
Huang, G., Zhang, Z., Zhuang, S., Wu, Y. J., Lü, Z., Tong, M., & Gao, H. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.13.670210 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shi, L. X., Ichter, B., Equi, M., Ke, L., Pertsch, K., Vuong, Q., Tanner, J., Walling, A., Wang, H., Fusai, N., Li-Bell, A., Driess, D., Groom, L., Levine, S., & Finn, C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2502.19417
- OpenAlex
- W4416045178
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- robot task execution, multi-step reasoning, dual-arm robot, mobile robots, housework, vision-language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review