PreprintCited by 4Topic ModelingAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningMisinformation and Its Impacts

HalluCounter: Reference-free LLM Hallucination Detection in the Wild!

Open access
Urlana, Ashok, Kanumolu, Gopichand, Kumar, Charaka Vinayak, Garlapati, Bala Mallikarjunarao, Mishra, Rahul·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Response consistency-based, reference-free hallucination detection (RFHD) methods do not depend on internal model states, such as generation probabilities or gradients, which Grey-box models typically rely on but are inaccessible in closed-source LLMs. However, their inability to capture query-response alignment patterns often results in lower detection accuracy. Additionally, the lack of large-scale benchmark datasets spanning diverse domains remains a challenge, as most existing datasets are limited in size and scope. To this end, we propose HalluCounter, a novel reference-free hallucination detection method that utilizes both response-response and query-response consistency and alignment patterns. This enables the training of a classifier that detects hallucinations and provides a confidence score and an optimal response for user queries. Furthermore, we introduce HalluCounterEval, a benchmark dataset comprising both synthetically generated and human-curated samples across multiple domains. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches by a significant margin, achieving over 90\% average confidence in hallucination detection across datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2503.04615

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Marah Abdin, Jyoti Aneja, Hany Awadalla, Ahmed Awadallah, Ammar Ahmad Awan, Nguyen Bach, Amit Bahree, Arash Bakhtiari, Jianmin Bao, Harkirat Behl, et al. 2024. Phi-3 technical report: A highly capable language model locally on your phone. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14219 . · arXiv
  2. Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 . · arXiv
  3. Janice Ahn, Rishu Verma, Renze Lou, Di Liu, Rui Zhang, and Wenpeng Yin. 2024. Large language models for mathematical reasoning: Progresses and challenges. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop , pages 225-237, St. Julian's, Malta. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. Amos Azaria and Tom Mitchell. 2023. The internal state of an LLM knows when it's lying. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , pages 967-976, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  5. Chao Chen, Kai Liu, Ze Chen, Yi Gu, Yue Wu, Mingyuan Tao, Zhihang Fu, and Jieping Ye. 2024. Inside: Llms' internal states retain the power of hallucination detection. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations .
  6. Daniel Deutsch, Rotem Dror, and Dan Roth. 2022. On the limitations of reference-free evaluations of generated text. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 10960-10977, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  7. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) , pages 4171-4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  8. Xuefeng Du, Chaowei Xiao, and Sharon Li. 2024. Haloscope: Harnessing unlabeled llm generations for hallucination detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 37:102948-102972.
  9. Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Amy Yang, Angela Fan, et al. 2024. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 . · arXiv
  10. Sebastian Farquhar, Jannik Kossen, Lorenz Kuhn, and Yarin Gal. 2024. Detecting hallucinations in large language models using semantic entropy. Nature , 630(8017):625-630.
  11. Etienne Fortier-Dubois and Domenic Rosati. 2023. Using contradictions improves question answering systems. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) , pages 827-840, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  12. Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daumé III, and Kate Crawford. 2021. Datasheets for datasets. Commun. ACM , 64(12).
  13. Pengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, and Weizhu Chen. 2021. Deberta: Decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention. In International Conference on Learning Representations .
  14. Xiangkun Hu, Dongyu Ru, Lin Qiu, Qipeng Guo, Tianhang Zhang, Yang Xu, Yun Luo, Pengfei Liu, Yue Zhang, and Zheng Zhang. 2024. Refchecker: Reference-based fine-grained hallucination checker and benchmark for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14486 . · arXiv
  15. Aaron Hurst, Adam Lerer, Adam P Goucher, Adam Perelman, Aditya Ramesh, Aidan Clark, AJ Ostrow, Akila Welihinda, Alan Hayes, Alec Radford, et al. 2024. Gpt-4o system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 . · arXiv
  16. Ziwei Ji, Delong Chen, Etsuko Ishii, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Yejin Bang, Bryan Wilie, and Pascale Fung. 2024. Llm internal states reveal hallucination risk faced with a query. In Proceedings of the 7th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP , pages 88-104.
  17. Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, et al. 2023. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825 . · arXiv
  18. Junyi Li, Xiaoxue Cheng, Xin Zhao, Jian-Yun Nie, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2023. HaluEval: A large-scale hallucination evaluation benchmark for large language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 6449-6464, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  19. Qing Li, Jiahui Geng, Chenyang Lyu, Derui Zhu, Maxim Panov, and Fakhri Karray. 2024. Referencefree hallucination detection for large vision-language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages 4542-4551, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  20. Zi Lin, Jeremiah Zhe Liu, and Jingbo Shang. 2022. Towards collaborative neural-symbolic graph semantic parsing via uncertainty. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 , pages 4160-4173, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  21. Tianyu Liu, Yizhe Zhang, Chris Brockett, Yi Mao, Zhifang Sui, Weizhu Chen, and Bill Dolan. 2022. A token-level reference-free hallucination detection benchmark for free-form text generation. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 6723-6737, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  22. Xin Liu, Muhammad Khalifa, and Lu Wang. 2024. Litcab: Lightweight language model calibration over short-and long-form responses. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations .
  23. Junyu Luo, Cao Xiao, and Fenglong Ma. 2024. Zeroresource hallucination prevention for large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages 3586-3602, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  24. Andrey Malinin and Mark Gales. 2021. Uncertainty estimation in autoregressive structured prediction. In International Conference on Learning Representations .
  25. Potsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, and Mark Gales. 2023. SelfCheckGPT: Zero-resource black-box hallucination detection for generative large language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 9004-9017, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  26. Hancheol Park and Geonmin Kim. 2025. Where do LLMs encode the knowledge to assess the ambiguity? In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Industry Track , pages 445-452, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  27. Pranab Sahoo, Prabhash Meharia, Akash Ghosh, Sriparna Saha, Vinija Jain, and Aman Chadha. 2024a. A comprehensive survey of hallucination in large language, image, video and audio foundation models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages 11709-11724, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  28. Pranab Sahoo, Prabhash Meharia, Akash Ghosh, Sriparna Saha, Vinija Jain, and Aman Chadha. 2024b. A comprehensive survey of hallucination in large language, image, video and audio foundation models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages 11709-11724, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  29. Ben Snyder, Marius Moisescu, and Muhammad Bilal Zafar. 2024. On early detection of hallucinations in factual question answering. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , pages 2721-2732.
  30. Kv Aditya Srivatsa and Ekaterina Kochmar. 2024. What makes math word problems challenging for LLMs? In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 , pages 1138-1148, Mexico City, Mexico. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  31. Gemma Team, Thomas Mesnard, Cassidy Hardin, Robert Dadashi, Surya Bhupatiraju, Shreya Pathak, Laurent Sifre, Morgane Rivière, Mihir Sanjay Kale, Juliette Love, et al. 2024. Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08295 . · arXiv
  32. Jiaheng Wei, Yuanshun Yao, Jean-Francois Ton, Hongyi Guo, Andrew Estornell, and Yang Liu. 2024. Measuring and reducing llm hallucination without goldstandard answers via expertise-weighting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10412 . · arXiv
  33. Adina Williams, Nikita Nangia, and Samuel Bowman. 2018. A broad-coverage challenge corpus for sentence understanding through inference. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) , pages 1112-1122, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  34. Junfei Wu, Qiang Liu, Ding Wang, Jinghao Zhang, Shu Wu, Liang Wang, and Tieniu Tan. 2024. Logical closed loop: Uncovering object hallucinations in large vision-language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024 , pages 6944-6962, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  35. Yijun Xiao and William Yang Wang. 2021. On hallucination and predictive uncertainty in conditional language generation. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume , pages 2734-2744, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  36. An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, et al. 2024. Qwen2. 5 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15115 . · arXiv
  37. Dongjie Yang and Hai Zhao. 2024. Are LLMs aware that some questions are not open-ended? In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics:
  38. EMNLP 2024 , pages 2142-2152, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  39. Zijiang Yang. 2024. Improving the natural language inference robustness to hard dataset by data augmentation and preprocessing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.07108 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07108 · arXiv
  40. Yakir Yehuda, Itzik Malkiel, Oren Barkan, Jonathan Weill, Royi Ronen, and Noam Koenigstein. 2024. InterrogateLLM: Zero-resource hallucination detection in LLM-generated answers. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 9333-9347, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  41. Jiaxin Zhang, Zhuohang Li, Kamalika Das, Bradley Malin, and Sricharan Kumar. 2023. SAC 3 : Reliable hallucination detection in black-box language models via semantic-aware cross-check consistency. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , pages 15445-15458, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  42. Peiyuan Zhang, Guangtao Zeng, Tianduo Wang, and Wei Lu. 2024. Tinyllama: An open-source small language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02385 . · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Urlana, A., Kanumolu, G., Kumar, C. V., Garlapati, B. M., & Mishra, R.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Pages
352-383
OpenAlex
W7138005540
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (IJCNLP-AACL) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
hallucination detection, large language models, reference-free evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review