PreprintCited by 85Software-Defined Networks and 5GAdvanced Data and IoT TechnologiesIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Towards Agentic AI Networking in 6G: A Generative Foundation Model-as-Agent Approach

Open access

Abstract

The promising potential of AI and network convergence in improving networking performance and enabling new service capabilities has recently attracted significant interest. Existing network AI solutions, while powerful, are mainly built based on the close-loop and passive learning framework, resulting in major limitations in autonomous solution finding and dynamic environmental adaptation. Agentic AI has recently been introduced as a promising solution to address the above limitations and pave the way for true generally intelligent and beneficial AI systems. The key idea is to create a networking ecosystem to support a diverse range of autonomous and embodied AI agents in fulfilling their goals. In this paper, we focus on the novel challenges and requirements of agentic AI networking. We propose AgentNet, a novel framework for supporting interaction, collaborative learning, and knowledge transfer among AI agents. We introduce a general architectural framework of AgentNet and then propose a generative foundation model (GFM)-based implementation in which multiple GFM-as-agents have been created as an interactive knowledge-base to bootstrap the development of embodied AI agents according to different task requirements and environmental features. We consider two application scenarios, digital-twin-based industrial automation and metaverse-based infotainment system, to describe how to apply AgentNet for supporting efficient task-driven collaboration and interaction among AI agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2503.15764

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inter-agent communication is mediated through distributed communication channels, such as asynchronous messaging queues, shared memory buffers, or intermediate output exchanges, enabling coordination without necessitating continuous central oversight.

    “Inter-agent communication is mediated through distributed communication channels , such as asynchronous messaging queues, shared memory buffers, or intermediate output exchanges, enabling coordination without necessitating continuous central oversight [21], [153].”

    From AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [153]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [1][1] Y. Yang et al. , '6G network AI architecture for everyone-centric customized services,' IEEE Network , vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 71-80, Sep. 2023. -
  2. [2][2] Y. Xiao et al. , 'Toward self-learning edge intelligence in 6G,' IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 34-40, Dec. 2020. -
  3. [3][3] M. A. Habibi et al. , 'Towards an AI/ML-driven SMO framework in ORAN: Scenarios, solutions, and challenges,' in IEEE Future Networks World Forum , Dubai, UAE, Oct. 2024. -
  4. [4][4] M. R. Morris et al. , 'Position: Levels of AGI for operationalizing progress on the path to agi,' in Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning , Vienna, Austria, Jul. 2024. -
  5. [5][5] S. Murugesan, 'The rise of agentic AI: Implications, concerns, and the path forward,' IEEE Intelligent Systems , vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 8-14, Mar.Apr. 2025. -
  6. [6][6] Y. Xiao et al. , 'Imitation learning-based implicit semantic-aware communication networks: Multi-layer representation and collaborative reasoning,' IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 639-658, Mar. 2023. -
  7. [7][7] X. Lin, 'An overview of AI in 3GPP's RAN Release 18: Enhancing next-generation connectivity?' IEEE ComSoc Technology News , Mar. 2024. -
  8. [9][9] Y. Xiao and M. Krunz, 'Distributed optimization for energy-efficient fog computing in the Tactile Internet,' IEEE J. Sel. Area Commun. , vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2390-2400, Nov. 2018. -
  9. [10][10] A. Fallah et al. , 'Generalization of model-agnostic meta-learning algorithms: Recurring and unseen tasks,' Proc. Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , vol. 34, pp. 5469-5480, Virtual conference, Dec. 2021. -
  10. [11][11] P. Zhang et al. , 'Toward net-zero carbon emissions in network AI for 6G and beyond,' IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 58-64, Apr. 2024. -
  11. [12][12] D. Gunduz et al. , 'Joint source-channel coding: Fundamentals and recent progress in practical designs,' Proceedings of the IEEE , pp. 1-32, 2024. -
  12. [13][13] Y. Xiao et al. , 'Distributed traffic synthesis and classification in edge networks: A federated self-supervised learning approach,' IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1815-1829, Feb. 2024. -
  13. [14][14] G. Chi et al. , 'RF-diffusion: Radio signal generation via time-frequency diffusion,' in Proc. International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MobiCom) , Washington, D.C., Nov. 2024, p. 77-92. -
  14. [15][15] H. Zhu et al. , 'SANSee: A physical-layer semantic-aware networking framework for distributed wireless sensing,' IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1636-1653, Mar. 2025. Yong Xiao (Senior Member, IEEE) is a professor in the School of Electronic Information and Communications at the Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China. His research interests include semantic communication, green network systems, and Internet-of-Things (IoT). Guangming Shi (Fellow, IEEE) is the deputy director of Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China. He is also a professor with the School of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian university. His research interest includes artificial intelligence, semantic communication, brain-inspired computing, and signal processing. Ping Zhang (Fellow, IEEE) is currently a Professor with the School of Information and Communication Engineering, BUPT, and also the Director of the State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology. He is an Academician with the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE). His research is in the board area of wireless communications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xiao, Y., Shi, G., & Zhang, P.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415286971
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Data and IoT Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
agentic AI, 6G, generative foundation models, AI agents, cooperative learning, knowledge transfer, embodied agents, digital twin, industrial automation, metaverse, infotainment systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review