Acting Less is Reasoning More! Teaching Model to Act Efficiently
Open accessAbstract
Tool-integrated reasoning (TIR) augments large language models (LLMs) with the ability to invoke external tools during long-form reasoning, such as search engines and code interpreters, to solve tasks beyond the capabilities of internal reasoning. While reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promise in training such agents, most of existing approaches typically optimize only for final correctness without considering the efficiency or necessity of external tool use. This often leads to excessive tool calling, incurring high computational costs and hindering the development of internal reasoning capabilities - a phenomenon known as \textit{cognitive offloading}. To this end, we propose Optimal Tool Call-controlled Policy Optimization (OTC-PO), a simple yet effective RL-based framework that encourages models to produce accurate answers with minimal tool calls. Our method introduces a tool-integrated reward that jointly considers answer correctness and corresponding tool use behavior of model to reach that answer. To validate the effectiveness, we introduce the metric of \textit{tool productivity}, defined as the ratio between the number of correct answers and the total number of tool calls across all test cases. This metric reflects how efficiently tool usage contributes to successful task completion, with higher values indicating smarter and more autonomous reasoning. We instantiate this framework within both Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Group Relative Preference Optimization (GRPO), resulting in OTC-PPO and OTC-GRPO. Experiments with Qwen-2.5 and Qwen-Math across multiple QA benchmarks show that our approach reduces tool calls by up to 68.3\% and improves tool productivity by up to 215.4\%, while maintaining comparable answer accuracy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reinforcement learning has recently shown strong potential for aligning LLM behavior with high-level objectives, including tool use, web navigation, and search optimization.
“Reinforcement learning (RL), in contrast, has recently shown strong potential for aligning LLM behavior with high-level objectives, including tool use (Qian et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025), web navigation (Wei et al., 2025), and search optimization (Jin et al., 2025; Song et al., 2025).”
From Memory-R1: Enhancing Large Language Model Agents to Manage and Utilize Memories via Reinforcement Learning (2025) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- [1][1] Yann LeCun. A path towards autonomous machine intelligence version 0.9. 2, 2022-06-27. Open Review , 62(1):1-62, 2022. -
- [6][6] Hongru WANG, Deng Cai, Wanjun Zhong, Shijue Huang, Jeff Z. Pan, Zeming Liu, and Kam-Fai Wong. Self-reasoning language models: Unfold hidden reasoning chains with few reasoning catalyst. In Workshop on Reasoning and Planning for Large Language Models , 2025. -
- [9][9] Zhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, yelong shen, Yujiu Yang, Minlie Huang, Nan Duan, and Weizhu Chen. ToRA: A tool-integrated reasoning agent for mathematical problem solving. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , 2024. -
- [11][11] Hongru Wang, Minda Hu, Yang Deng, Rui Wang, Fei Mi, Weichao Wang, Yasheng Wang, Wai-Chung Kwan, Irwin King, and Kam-Fai Wong. Large language models as source planner for personalized knowledge-grounded dialogues. In Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali, editors, Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , pages 9556-9569, Singapore, December 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics. -
- [12][12] Cheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Hongru Wang, Xiusi Chen, Avirup Sil, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Gokhan Tur, and Heng Ji. Smart: Self-aware agent for tool overuse mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11435 , 2025. - · arXiv
- [13][13] Hongru Wang, Yujia Qin, Yankai Lin, Jeff Z. Pan, and Kam-Fai Wong. Empowering large language models: Tool learning for real-world interaction. In Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , SIGIR '24, page 2983-2986, New York, NY, USA, 2024. Association for Computing Machinery. -
- [17][17] Evan F Risko and Sam J Gilbert. Cognitive offloading. Trends in cognitive sciences , 20(9):676688, 2016. -
- [19][19] John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 , 2017. - · arXiv
- [20][20] Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, Y Wu, et al. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300 , 2024. - · arXiv
- [21][21] Cheng Qian, Chi Han, Yi Fung, Yujia Qin, Zhiyuan Liu, and Heng Ji. CREATOR: Tool creation for disentangling abstract and concrete reasoning of large language models. In Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali, editors, Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , pages 6922-6939, Singapore, December 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics. -
- [22][22] Hongru Wang, Rui Wang, Boyang Xue, Heming Xia, Jingtao Cao, Zeming Liu, Jeff Z. Pan, and Kam-Fai Wong. AppBench: Planning of multiple APIs from various APPs for complex user instruction. In Yaser Al-Onaizan, Mohit Bansal, and Yun-Nung Chen, editors, Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 15322-15336, Miami, Florida, USA, November 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics. -
- [23][23] Cheng Qian, Shihao Liang, Yujia Qin, Yining Ye, Xin Cong, Yankai Lin, Yesai Wu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. Investigate-consolidate-exploit: A general strategy for inter-task agent self-evolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13996 , 2024. - · arXiv
- [25][25] Cheng Qian, Peixuan Han, Qinyu Luo, Bingxiang He, Xiusi Chen, Yuji Zhang, Hongyi Du, Jiarui Yao, Xiaocheng Yang, Denghui Zhang, et al. Escapebench: Pushing language models to think outside the box. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13549 , 2024. - · arXiv
- [28][28] Cheng Qian, Chenyan Xiong, Zhenghao Liu, and Zhiyuan Liu. Toolink: Linking toolkit creation and using through chain-of-solving on open-source model. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 831-854, 2024. -
- [31][31] Cheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang, Xiusi Chen, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Gokhan Tur, and Heng Ji. Toolrl: Reward is all tool learning needs. arXiv preprint , 2025. -
- [32][32] Yuanhao Shen, Xiaodan Zhu, and Lei Chen. SMARTCAL: An approach to self-aware tool-use evaluation and calibration. In Franck Dernoncourt, Daniel Preo¸ tiuc-Pietro, and Anastasia Shimorina, editors, Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track , pages 774-789, Miami, Florida, US, November 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics. -
- [37][37] Hongru Wang, Huimin Wang, Zezhong Wang, and Kam-Fai Wong. Integrating pretrained language model for dialogue policy evaluation. In ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pages 6692-6696, 2022. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yan, S., Yang, X., Huang, Z., Nie, E., Ding, Z., Li, Z., Ma, X., Bi, J., Kersting, K., Pan, J. Z., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.583 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Gao, H.-A., Geng, J., Hua, W., Hu, M., Juan, X., Liu, H., Liu, S., Qiu, J., Qi, X., Wu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.21046 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationYan, S., Yang, X., Huang, Z., Nie, E., Ding, Z., Li, Z., Ma, X., Bi, J., Kersting, K., Pan, J. Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.19828 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Memento: Fine-tuning LLM Agents without Fine-tuning LLMs
Zhou, H., Chen, Y., Guo, S., Yan, X., Lee, K. H., Wang, Z., Lee, K. Y., Zhang, G., Shao, K., Yang, L., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.16153 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
SafeToolBench: pioneering a prospective benchmark to evaluating tool utilization safety in LLMs
Xia, H., Wang, H., Liu, Z., Yu, Q., Guo, Y., & Wang, H. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.958 · Cited by 1
Self-citationFrom Word to World: Can Large Language Models be Implicit Text-based World Models?
Li, Y., Wang, H., Qiu, J., Yin, Z., Zhang, D., Qian, C., Li, Z., Ma, X., Chen, G., & Ji, H. (2026) · Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.366
Self-citationToolBox-RL: Learning to Generalize Tool Use Across Massive Repositories
Shi, X., Wang, R., Liu, H., & Li, P. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792538
- Authors
- Wang, H., Qian, C., Zhong, W., Chen, X., Qiu, J., Huang, S., Jin, B., Wang, M., Wong, K.-F., & Ji, H.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2504.14870
- OpenAlex
- W4414886075
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- tool-integrated reasoning, cognitive offloading, large language models, proximal policy optimization, question answering, code interpreter, search engines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review